[問題] 為什麼頂級手機一定要強調金屬材質??
看板MobileComm作者GianniC (法官之無恥,是謂國恥!!!)時間9年前 (2015/06/14 21:59)推噓47(47推 0噓 91→)留言138則, 49人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
金屬材質除了導熱快 還有什麼優點??
就像旅行箱 金屬箱也許很漂亮 你要達到足夠的強度重量一定相對較重
還有金屬比較容易刮傷
即使是塑料 還是有很多變化 而且可以在強度彈性跟重量上取得更好的平衡
為什麼很多評論手機外殼 不從其強度 功能性
或是重量等等容易量化的點去切入
不要只是看到塑料就一句話塑料感帶過 即使是塑料 還是有很多不同吧
需要這麼一昧的鄙視嗎??
我並不是排斥金屬材質
我只是認為 無論是什麼材質 還是要回到機能性去評價
而非單純主觀的只說質感等等
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.163.186.181
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1434290350.A.C29.html
推
06/14 22:00, , 1F
06/14 22:00, 1F
推
06/14 22:00, , 2F
06/14 22:00, 2F
→
06/14 22:00, , 3F
06/14 22:00, 3F
推
06/14 22:00, , 4F
06/14 22:00, 4F
推
06/14 22:00, , 5F
06/14 22:00, 5F
→
06/14 22:01, , 6F
06/14 22:01, 6F
→
06/14 22:02, , 7F
06/14 22:02, 7F
→
06/14 22:02, , 8F
06/14 22:02, 8F
推
06/14 22:03, , 9F
06/14 22:03, 9F
→
06/14 22:03, , 10F
06/14 22:03, 10F
推
06/14 22:03, , 11F
06/14 22:03, 11F
→
06/14 22:03, , 12F
06/14 22:03, 12F
→
06/14 22:03, , 13F
06/14 22:03, 13F
推
06/14 22:04, , 14F
06/14 22:04, 14F
→
06/14 22:04, , 15F
06/14 22:04, 15F
→
06/14 22:04, , 16F
06/14 22:04, 16F
→
06/14 22:06, , 17F
06/14 22:06, 17F
推
06/14 22:07, , 18F
06/14 22:07, 18F
推
06/14 22:07, , 19F
06/14 22:07, 19F
→
06/14 22:07, , 20F
06/14 22:07, 20F
→
06/14 22:09, , 21F
06/14 22:09, 21F
→
06/14 22:11, , 22F
06/14 22:11, 22F
→
06/14 22:11, , 23F
06/14 22:11, 23F
推
06/14 22:11, , 24F
06/14 22:11, 24F
→
06/14 22:12, , 25F
06/14 22:12, 25F
→
06/14 22:13, , 26F
06/14 22:13, 26F
→
06/14 22:13, , 27F
06/14 22:13, 27F
→
06/14 22:13, , 28F
06/14 22:13, 28F
→
06/14 22:13, , 29F
06/14 22:13, 29F
→
06/14 22:14, , 30F
06/14 22:14, 30F
→
06/14 22:14, , 31F
06/14 22:14, 31F
→
06/14 22:14, , 32F
06/14 22:14, 32F
→
06/14 22:14, , 33F
06/14 22:14, 33F
→
06/14 22:14, , 34F
06/14 22:14, 34F
→
06/14 22:14, , 35F
06/14 22:14, 35F
→
06/14 22:14, , 36F
06/14 22:14, 36F
推
06/14 22:15, , 37F
06/14 22:15, 37F
→
06/14 22:15, , 38F
06/14 22:15, 38F
→
06/14 22:15, , 39F
06/14 22:15, 39F
還有 59 則推文
→
06/14 22:48, , 99F
06/14 22:48, 99F
→
06/14 22:48, , 100F
06/14 22:48, 100F
推
06/14 22:52, , 101F
06/14 22:52, 101F
推
06/14 23:01, , 102F
06/14 23:01, 102F
推
06/14 23:01, , 103F
06/14 23:01, 103F
推
06/14 23:10, , 104F
06/14 23:10, 104F
推
06/14 23:26, , 105F
06/14 23:26, 105F
推
06/14 23:49, , 106F
06/14 23:49, 106F
推
06/14 23:54, , 107F
06/14 23:54, 107F
→
06/14 23:54, , 108F
06/14 23:54, 108F
推
06/15 00:09, , 109F
06/15 00:09, 109F
→
06/15 00:09, , 110F
06/15 00:09, 110F
推
06/15 00:14, , 111F
06/15 00:14, 111F
推
06/15 00:31, , 112F
06/15 00:31, 112F
→
06/15 00:40, , 113F
06/15 00:40, 113F
→
06/15 00:40, , 114F
06/15 00:40, 114F
→
06/15 00:41, , 115F
06/15 00:41, 115F
推
06/15 00:43, , 116F
06/15 00:43, 116F
推
06/15 00:50, , 117F
06/15 00:50, 117F
→
06/15 00:50, , 118F
06/15 00:50, 118F
→
06/15 00:50, , 119F
06/15 00:50, 119F
→
06/15 00:50, , 120F
06/15 00:50, 120F
→
06/15 00:50, , 121F
06/15 00:50, 121F
推
06/15 01:11, , 122F
06/15 01:11, 122F
推
06/15 01:30, , 123F
06/15 01:30, 123F
推
06/15 01:40, , 124F
06/15 01:40, 124F
推
06/15 02:18, , 125F
06/15 02:18, 125F
→
06/15 05:14, , 126F
06/15 05:14, 126F
→
06/15 06:45, , 127F
06/15 06:45, 127F
推
06/15 07:42, , 128F
06/15 07:42, 128F
→
06/15 07:42, , 129F
06/15 07:42, 129F
→
06/15 08:17, , 130F
06/15 08:17, 130F
→
06/15 10:14, , 131F
06/15 10:14, 131F
推
06/15 19:04, , 132F
06/15 19:04, 132F
→
06/15 19:05, , 133F
06/15 19:05, 133F
推
06/15 21:28, , 134F
06/15 21:28, 134F
→
06/15 21:39, , 135F
06/15 21:39, 135F
→
06/15 21:39, , 136F
06/15 21:39, 136F
→
06/15 21:45, , 137F
06/15 21:45, 137F
推
06/16 22:11, , 138F
06/16 22:11, 138F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):