[問題] 想請問同樣價錢選擇android的原因已回收
看板MobileComm作者tyjcgmnl (thank you)時間9年前 (2015/02/05 23:12)推噓66(77推 11噓 171→)留言259則, 91人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
還記得當初iphone3gs出的時候
htc的hero也推出對打
價錢跟iphone不相上下
後來三爽的note、galaxy s系列也陸續以跟iphone差不多的旗艦價格推出
不少人因為價格較低而選擇android
但有段時間兩個陣營的旗艦機價格是差不多的
想請問在差不多價格下 為什麼會選擇android而非iphone?
我看過很多拿三爽旗艦的說iphone貴所以買三爽
但她們買的卻是空機價比iphone貴ㄧ千塊的note...好怪
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.197.78
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1423149138.A.798.html
推
02/05 23:13, , 1F
02/05 23:13, 1F
→
02/05 23:15, , 2F
02/05 23:15, 2F
推
02/05 23:15, , 3F
02/05 23:15, 3F
→
02/05 23:15, , 4F
02/05 23:15, 4F
→
02/05 23:20, , 5F
02/05 23:20, 5F
推
02/05 23:20, , 6F
02/05 23:20, 6F
→
02/05 23:20, , 7F
02/05 23:20, 7F
推
02/05 23:21, , 8F
02/05 23:21, 8F
推
02/05 23:22, , 9F
02/05 23:22, 9F
→
02/05 23:22, , 10F
02/05 23:22, 10F
→
02/05 23:23, , 11F
02/05 23:23, 11F
→
02/05 23:23, , 12F
02/05 23:23, 12F
推
02/05 23:24, , 13F
02/05 23:24, 13F
→
02/05 23:25, , 14F
02/05 23:25, 14F
推
02/05 23:25, , 15F
02/05 23:25, 15F
→
02/05 23:25, , 16F
02/05 23:25, 16F
→
02/05 23:25, , 17F
02/05 23:25, 17F
→
02/05 23:25, , 18F
02/05 23:25, 18F
→
02/05 23:26, , 19F
02/05 23:26, 19F
→
02/05 23:27, , 20F
02/05 23:27, 20F
→
02/05 23:28, , 21F
02/05 23:28, 21F
推
02/05 23:29, , 22F
02/05 23:29, 22F
推
02/05 23:30, , 23F
02/05 23:30, 23F
→
02/05 23:30, , 24F
02/05 23:30, 24F
推
02/05 23:30, , 25F
02/05 23:30, 25F
推
02/05 23:30, , 26F
02/05 23:30, 26F
推
02/05 23:33, , 27F
02/05 23:33, 27F
→
02/05 23:33, , 28F
02/05 23:33, 28F
推
02/05 23:34, , 29F
02/05 23:34, 29F
推
02/05 23:34, , 30F
02/05 23:34, 30F
→
02/05 23:34, , 31F
02/05 23:34, 31F
推
02/05 23:35, , 32F
02/05 23:35, 32F
→
02/05 23:35, , 33F
02/05 23:35, 33F
→
02/05 23:35, , 34F
02/05 23:35, 34F
推
02/05 23:37, , 35F
02/05 23:37, 35F
推
02/05 23:38, , 36F
02/05 23:38, 36F
→
02/05 23:38, , 37F
02/05 23:38, 37F
→
02/05 23:39, , 38F
02/05 23:39, 38F
→
02/05 23:39, , 39F
02/05 23:39, 39F
還有 180 則推文
→
02/06 10:03, , 220F
02/06 10:03, 220F
推
02/06 10:18, , 221F
02/06 10:18, 221F
→
02/06 11:00, , 222F
02/06 11:00, 222F
→
02/06 11:06, , 223F
02/06 11:06, 223F
噓
02/06 11:21, , 224F
02/06 11:21, 224F
推
02/06 11:28, , 225F
02/06 11:28, 225F
推
02/06 11:32, , 226F
02/06 11:32, 226F
→
02/06 11:32, , 227F
02/06 11:32, 227F
推
02/06 11:34, , 228F
02/06 11:34, 228F
→
02/06 13:04, , 229F
02/06 13:04, 229F
推
02/06 13:44, , 230F
02/06 13:44, 230F
→
02/06 13:44, , 231F
02/06 13:44, 231F
→
02/06 13:45, , 232F
02/06 13:45, 232F
→
02/06 13:45, , 233F
02/06 13:45, 233F
推
02/06 14:31, , 234F
02/06 14:31, 234F
推
02/06 14:38, , 235F
02/06 14:38, 235F
→
02/06 14:38, , 236F
02/06 14:38, 236F
→
02/06 14:39, , 237F
02/06 14:39, 237F
推
02/06 17:09, , 238F
02/06 17:09, 238F
推
02/06 17:23, , 239F
02/06 17:23, 239F
噓
02/06 18:07, , 240F
02/06 18:07, 240F
推
02/06 18:09, , 241F
02/06 18:09, 241F
→
02/06 18:43, , 242F
02/06 18:43, 242F
噓
02/06 19:47, , 243F
02/06 19:47, 243F
推
02/06 20:10, , 244F
02/06 20:10, 244F
推
02/06 23:12, , 245F
02/06 23:12, 245F
→
02/06 23:13, , 246F
02/06 23:13, 246F
→
02/06 23:13, , 247F
02/06 23:13, 247F
→
02/06 23:14, , 248F
02/06 23:14, 248F
推
02/07 02:14, , 249F
02/07 02:14, 249F
推
02/07 02:17, , 250F
02/07 02:17, 250F
→
02/07 02:17, , 251F
02/07 02:17, 251F
→
02/07 02:18, , 252F
02/07 02:18, 252F
推
02/07 02:20, , 253F
02/07 02:20, 253F
→
02/07 03:31, , 254F
02/07 03:31, 254F
推
02/07 04:24, , 255F
02/07 04:24, 255F
→
02/07 04:25, , 256F
02/07 04:25, 256F
→
02/07 04:25, , 257F
02/07 04:25, 257F
→
02/07 04:26, , 258F
02/07 04:26, 258F
推
05/10 14:20, , 259F
05/10 14:20, 259F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):