[問題] 為什麼三星不需用虛擬鍵?消失
可能是三星學iPhone使用home鍵的緣故,
但就是覺得為什麼只有三星有這樣的特權?
虛擬鍵真的是個很浪費空間跟生命的設計,螢幕下方跑出個海棉條,吃空間,
像HTCM8的五吋設計使用虛擬鍵後比前一代M7New One的4.7吋螢幕小,質感這樣好的手機也因為虛擬鍵價值下降。
也許三星手機醜加塑膠感重,Google的虛擬鍵不使用可以讓他們的手機不致於那麼失敗,但這樣偏心實在是讓人搖頭。
像Sony的手機外型很不錯,但全敗在虛擬鍵,Z1 compact實際螢幕可能不到4吋。
好的手機全敗在虛擬鍵這奇怪吃空間的設計,反而讓三星的手機從廉價中跑出一條路。
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
→
03/02 11:14, , 1F
03/02 11:14, 1F
→
03/02 11:14, , 2F
03/02 11:14, 2F
→
03/02 11:15, , 3F
03/02 11:15, 3F
推
03/02 11:15, , 4F
03/02 11:15, 4F
→
03/02 11:16, , 5F
03/02 11:16, 5F
→
03/02 11:16, , 6F
03/02 11:16, 6F
→
03/02 11:17, , 7F
03/02 11:17, 7F
推
03/02 11:18, , 8F
03/02 11:18, 8F
→
03/02 11:26, , 9F
03/02 11:26, 9F
推
03/02 11:27, , 10F
03/02 11:27, 10F
→
03/02 11:28, , 11F
03/02 11:28, 11F
→
03/02 11:30, , 12F
03/02 11:30, 12F
推
03/02 11:31, , 13F
03/02 11:31, 13F
→
03/02 11:37, , 14F
03/02 11:37, 14F
推
03/02 11:39, , 15F
03/02 11:39, 15F
→
03/02 11:39, , 16F
03/02 11:39, 16F
→
03/02 11:39, , 17F
03/02 11:39, 17F
→
03/02 11:40, , 18F
03/02 11:40, 18F
推
03/02 11:40, , 19F
03/02 11:40, 19F
推
03/02 11:45, , 20F
03/02 11:45, 20F
推
03/02 11:47, , 21F
03/02 11:47, 21F
→
03/02 11:47, , 22F
03/02 11:47, 22F
推
03/02 11:49, , 23F
03/02 11:49, 23F
→
03/02 11:49, , 24F
03/02 11:49, 24F
→
03/02 11:50, , 25F
03/02 11:50, 25F
→
03/02 11:50, , 26F
03/02 11:50, 26F
推
03/02 11:58, , 27F
03/02 11:58, 27F
→
03/02 11:58, , 28F
03/02 11:58, 28F
推
03/02 12:01, , 29F
03/02 12:01, 29F
推
03/02 12:02, , 30F
03/02 12:02, 30F
→
03/02 12:03, , 31F
03/02 12:03, 31F
→
03/02 12:04, , 32F
03/02 12:04, 32F
→
03/02 12:04, , 33F
03/02 12:04, 33F
→
03/02 12:06, , 34F
03/02 12:06, 34F
→
03/02 12:06, , 35F
03/02 12:06, 35F
推
03/02 12:09, , 36F
03/02 12:09, 36F
→
03/02 12:09, , 37F
03/02 12:09, 37F
推
03/02 12:09, , 38F
03/02 12:09, 38F
→
03/02 12:15, , 39F
03/02 12:15, 39F
→
03/02 12:15, , 40F
03/02 12:15, 40F
→
03/02 12:16, , 41F
03/02 12:16, 41F
推
03/02 12:19, , 42F
03/02 12:19, 42F
→
03/02 12:19, , 43F
03/02 12:19, 43F
→
03/02 12:19, , 44F
03/02 12:19, 44F
推
03/02 12:22, , 45F
03/02 12:22, 45F
推
03/02 12:24, , 46F
03/02 12:24, 46F
→
03/02 12:25, , 47F
03/02 12:25, 47F
推
03/02 12:25, , 48F
03/02 12:25, 48F
→
03/02 12:28, , 49F
03/02 12:28, 49F
→
03/02 12:36, , 50F
03/02 12:36, 50F
推
03/02 12:46, , 51F
03/02 12:46, 51F
推
03/02 12:55, , 52F
03/02 12:55, 52F
推
03/02 13:01, , 53F
03/02 13:01, 53F
推
03/02 13:10, , 54F
03/02 13:10, 54F
推
03/02 13:17, , 55F
03/02 13:17, 55F
推
03/02 13:20, , 56F
03/02 13:20, 56F
推
03/02 14:02, , 57F
03/02 14:02, 57F
→
03/02 14:04, , 58F
03/02 14:04, 58F
推
03/02 14:27, , 59F
03/02 14:27, 59F
→
03/02 14:27, , 60F
03/02 14:27, 60F
推
03/02 14:36, , 61F
03/02 14:36, 61F
推
03/02 14:51, , 62F
03/02 14:51, 62F
推
03/02 14:57, , 63F
03/02 14:57, 63F
推
03/02 15:05, , 64F
03/02 15:05, 64F
→
03/02 15:05, , 65F
03/02 15:05, 65F
推
03/02 15:07, , 66F
03/02 15:07, 66F
→
03/02 15:07, , 67F
03/02 15:07, 67F
→
03/02 15:58, , 68F
03/02 15:58, 68F
推
03/02 16:06, , 69F
03/02 16:06, 69F
推
03/02 16:15, , 70F
03/02 16:15, 70F
→
03/02 16:15, , 71F
03/02 16:15, 71F
→
03/02 16:20, , 72F
03/02 16:20, 72F
推
03/02 16:28, , 73F
03/02 16:28, 73F
→
03/02 16:28, , 74F
03/02 16:28, 74F
推
03/02 17:05, , 75F
03/02 17:05, 75F
推
03/02 17:11, , 76F
03/02 17:11, 76F
→
03/02 17:13, , 77F
03/02 17:13, 77F
→
03/02 17:13, , 78F
03/02 17:13, 78F
推
03/02 17:38, , 79F
03/02 17:38, 79F
→
03/02 17:55, , 80F
03/02 17:55, 80F
推
03/02 18:12, , 81F
03/02 18:12, 81F
推
03/02 18:16, , 82F
03/02 18:16, 82F
推
03/02 22:41, , 83F
03/02 22:41, 83F
推
03/02 23:05, , 84F
03/02 23:05, 84F
→
03/02 23:06, , 85F
03/02 23:06, 85F
推
03/02 23:29, , 86F
03/02 23:29, 86F
推
03/02 23:35, , 87F
03/02 23:35, 87F
推
03/04 08:29, , 88F
03/04 08:29, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)