[討論] 為何陸軍不增購雷霆2000
之前新聞出來陸軍不打算增購雷霆2000
我做了一個很簡單的說法來進行討論,那就是在解放軍大量裝備氣墊登陸艇後,我方的殲
敵於舟波的想定已難以達成,加上氣墊登陸艇的地型適性和高速,讓解放軍可以進行多個
登陸點的登陸作戰,並且奪取二線港口,進一步加大登陸兵力。
在此前提下,雷霆2000以平方公里清除器的作用,在敵我分際不明確的地域就會造成過傷
殺的情況,甚至在我方來不及疏散平民的情況下,對平民的殺傷有可能大於敵軍的一個風
險。
這又拉回到問題的根本,我們要如何面對5~10年後可能的戰術環境,提昇目前火砲指管系
統是當務之急,而打擊兵力是否能在高威脅的登陸點上進行奪回也是重要的課題。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7QMO2jnT9Y
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.133.130.102
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Military/M.1498721577.A.CEF.html
→
06/29 15:48, , 1F
06/29 15:48, 1F
→
06/29 15:49, , 2F
06/29 15:49, 2F
→
06/29 15:50, , 3F
06/29 15:50, 3F
推
06/29 15:57, , 4F
06/29 15:57, 4F
這其實問題在於,50公里其實來的就是舟波了,你能佈多少飛彈,而這些飛彈一樣是有通
情指管問題。
推
06/29 15:59, , 5F
06/29 15:59, 5F
昇級通情指管比較有效益,臺灣的火砲不是射程問題,是指管太落後了。
※ 編輯: tenweli (220.133.130.102), 06/29/2017 16:00:22
※ 編輯: tenweli (220.133.130.102), 06/29/2017 16:01:54
→
06/29 16:07, , 6F
06/29 16:07, 6F
推
06/29 16:08, , 7F
06/29 16:08, 7F
→
06/29 16:09, , 8F
06/29 16:09, 8F
→
06/29 16:09, , 9F
06/29 16:09, 9F
→
06/29 16:10, , 10F
06/29 16:10, 10F
→
06/29 16:13, , 11F
06/29 16:13, 11F
→
06/29 16:16, , 12F
06/29 16:16, 12F
→
06/29 16:17, , 13F
06/29 16:17, 13F
→
06/29 16:17, , 14F
06/29 16:17, 14F
→
06/29 16:20, , 15F
06/29 16:20, 15F
→
06/29 16:21, , 16F
06/29 16:21, 16F
→
06/29 16:22, , 17F
06/29 16:22, 17F
→
06/29 16:24, , 18F
06/29 16:24, 18F
→
06/29 16:25, , 19F
06/29 16:25, 19F
→
06/29 16:26, , 20F
06/29 16:26, 20F
→
06/29 16:26, , 21F
06/29 16:26, 21F
→
06/29 16:26, , 22F
06/29 16:26, 22F
→
06/29 16:27, , 23F
06/29 16:27, 23F
→
06/29 16:28, , 24F
06/29 16:28, 24F
→
06/29 16:28, , 25F
06/29 16:28, 25F
→
06/29 16:28, , 26F
06/29 16:28, 26F
推
06/29 16:29, , 27F
06/29 16:29, 27F
→
06/29 16:29, , 28F
06/29 16:29, 28F
→
06/29 16:31, , 29F
06/29 16:31, 29F
→
06/29 16:31, , 30F
06/29 16:31, 30F
→
06/29 16:31, , 31F
06/29 16:31, 31F
→
06/29 16:32, , 32F
06/29 16:32, 32F
→
06/29 16:33, , 33F
06/29 16:33, 33F
→
06/29 16:34, , 34F
06/29 16:34, 34F
→
06/29 16:36, , 35F
06/29 16:36, 35F
→
06/29 16:37, , 36F
06/29 16:37, 36F
→
06/29 16:38, , 37F
06/29 16:38, 37F
→
06/29 16:38, , 38F
06/29 16:38, 38F
→
06/29 16:39, , 39F
06/29 16:39, 39F
→
06/29 16:40, , 40F
06/29 16:40, 40F
→
06/29 16:40, , 41F
06/29 16:40, 41F
→
06/29 16:40, , 42F
06/29 16:40, 42F
→
06/29 16:41, , 43F
06/29 16:41, 43F
→
06/29 16:41, , 44F
06/29 16:41, 44F
→
06/29 16:42, , 45F
06/29 16:42, 45F
→
06/29 16:43, , 46F
06/29 16:43, 46F
→
06/29 16:44, , 47F
06/29 16:44, 47F
→
06/29 16:44, , 48F
06/29 16:44, 48F
→
06/29 16:44, , 49F
06/29 16:44, 49F
→
06/29 16:45, , 50F
06/29 16:45, 50F
→
06/29 16:46, , 51F
06/29 16:46, 51F
→
06/29 16:47, , 52F
06/29 16:47, 52F
推
06/29 16:51, , 53F
06/29 16:51, 53F
→
06/29 16:51, , 54F
06/29 16:51, 54F
→
06/29 16:53, , 55F
06/29 16:53, 55F
→
06/29 16:53, , 56F
06/29 16:53, 56F
→
06/29 17:09, , 57F
06/29 17:09, 57F
→
06/29 17:10, , 58F
06/29 17:10, 58F
→
06/29 17:11, , 59F
06/29 17:11, 59F
→
06/29 17:13, , 60F
06/29 17:13, 60F
→
06/29 17:14, , 61F
06/29 17:14, 61F
→
06/29 17:14, , 62F
06/29 17:14, 62F
推
06/29 17:15, , 63F
06/29 17:15, 63F
→
06/29 17:16, , 64F
06/29 17:16, 64F
→
06/29 17:20, , 65F
06/29 17:20, 65F
→
06/29 17:20, , 66F
06/29 17:20, 66F
→
06/29 17:35, , 67F
06/29 17:35, 67F
→
06/29 17:36, , 68F
06/29 17:36, 68F
→
06/29 17:36, , 69F
06/29 17:36, 69F
→
06/29 17:37, , 70F
06/29 17:37, 70F
→
06/29 17:39, , 71F
06/29 17:39, 71F
→
06/29 17:39, , 72F
06/29 17:39, 72F
→
06/29 17:39, , 73F
06/29 17:39, 73F
→
06/29 20:01, , 74F
06/29 20:01, 74F
→
06/29 20:05, , 75F
06/29 20:05, 75F
→
06/30 16:39, , 76F
06/30 16:39, 76F
→
06/30 16:39, , 77F
06/30 16:39, 77F
→
06/30 16:40, , 78F
06/30 16:40, 78F
推
07/01 10:51, , 79F
07/01 10:51, 79F
→
07/01 10:52, , 80F
07/01 10:52, 80F
→
07/01 11:52, , 81F
07/01 11:52, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)