Re: [請益] 靠理財方式翻身的可行性高嗎?
看板MenTalk作者ZMittermeyer (我不是善良老百姓)時間10年前 (2014/02/14 17:53)推噓-2(13推 15噓 36→)留言64則, 35人參與討論串5/8 (看更多)
※ 引述《elvisam5435 (elvis)》之銘言:
: 老大不小的都已經快要30歲了
: 生活過的簡單加上也不煙不酒的
: 要說真的沒什麼長進的話大概就是對於理財這件事真的是很廢
: 每個月薪水進來很簡單直接分成三等份
: 1.孝親
不用孝了 管他去死
你爸一定比你有錢 因為你的資產近似於零 他再廢那個老家也有兩三百萬
他好手好腳的整天要錢個屁 有工作就吃自己工作 退休就退休金過活啦
一個月幾千塊退休金也能很好過下去的
不用挑一些很極端的案例 以上我講的適用95%人
基本上這是一個最差的觀念 也是為什麼有錢的人更有錢 窮人更窮的關鍵之一
有孝親這種想法的家庭根本是農業社會的落後家庭
那個社會不把人當人看 不把兒女當人看 兒女是生下來增加家庭勞動力的
基本上20~30的大多數人自己都餵不飽了 還去餵原生家庭簡直頗ㄏ
一個在社會上累積三十年的成年人根本不用你養 如果還需要 他真的該反省丟臉
我不知道你付多少 5000 10000 20000
每個月付那些打水漂錢根本錢太多 全部拿去滾定期定額吧!
免得阿呆父母亂花錢以後害死自己也害死別人
: 2.生活用零用錢
: 3.存銀行
沒錢的窮人根本沒有存銀行的資格
現金留10萬 其他全部拿去投資
End.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.221.62
噓
02/14 18:16, , 1F
02/14 18:16, 1F
噓
02/14 18:18, , 2F
02/14 18:18, 2F
推
02/14 18:23, , 3F
02/14 18:23, 3F
噓
02/14 18:30, , 4F
02/14 18:30, 4F
→
02/14 18:33, , 5F
02/14 18:33, 5F
噓
02/14 18:37, , 6F
02/14 18:37, 6F
→
02/14 18:38, , 7F
02/14 18:38, 7F
→
02/14 18:39, , 8F
02/14 18:39, 8F
→
02/14 18:39, , 9F
02/14 18:39, 9F
→
02/14 18:40, , 10F
02/14 18:40, 10F
→
02/14 18:40, , 11F
02/14 18:40, 11F
噓
02/14 18:41, , 12F
02/14 18:41, 12F
→
02/14 18:43, , 13F
02/14 18:43, 13F
→
02/14 18:59, , 14F
02/14 18:59, 14F
→
02/14 19:02, , 15F
02/14 19:02, 15F
推
02/14 19:22, , 16F
02/14 19:22, 16F
噓
02/14 19:26, , 17F
02/14 19:26, 17F
→
02/14 19:55, , 18F
02/14 19:55, 18F
→
02/14 20:10, , 19F
02/14 20:10, 19F
噓
02/14 20:35, , 20F
02/14 20:35, 20F
噓
02/14 20:43, , 21F
02/14 20:43, 21F
噓
02/14 20:58, , 22F
02/14 20:58, 22F
噓
02/14 21:00, , 23F
02/14 21:00, 23F
→
02/14 21:06, , 24F
02/14 21:06, 24F
噓
02/14 22:07, , 25F
02/14 22:07, 25F
→
02/14 22:14, , 26F
02/14 22:14, 26F
→
02/14 22:14, , 27F
02/14 22:14, 27F
→
02/14 22:15, , 28F
02/14 22:15, 28F
→
02/14 22:15, , 29F
02/14 22:15, 29F
→
02/14 22:17, , 30F
02/14 22:17, 30F
→
02/14 22:18, , 31F
02/14 22:18, 31F
→
02/14 22:19, , 32F
02/14 22:19, 32F
→
02/14 22:20, , 33F
02/14 22:20, 33F
→
02/14 22:20, , 34F
02/14 22:20, 34F
→
02/14 22:21, , 35F
02/14 22:21, 35F
→
02/14 22:22, , 36F
02/14 22:22, 36F
→
02/14 22:22, , 37F
02/14 22:22, 37F
→
02/14 22:22, , 38F
02/14 22:22, 38F
→
02/14 22:22, , 39F
02/14 22:22, 39F
噓
02/14 22:46, , 40F
02/14 22:46, 40F
推
02/14 22:52, , 41F
02/14 22:52, 41F
→
02/14 22:52, , 42F
02/14 22:52, 42F
→
02/14 22:53, , 43F
02/14 22:53, 43F
→
02/14 22:53, , 44F
02/14 22:53, 44F
推
02/14 23:22, , 45F
02/14 23:22, 45F
推
02/15 00:25, , 46F
02/15 00:25, 46F
噓
02/15 01:07, , 47F
02/15 01:07, 47F
噓
02/15 01:10, , 48F
02/15 01:10, 48F
→
02/15 01:11, , 49F
02/15 01:11, 49F
→
02/15 01:11, , 50F
02/15 01:11, 50F
→
02/15 01:12, , 51F
02/15 01:12, 51F
→
02/15 03:18, , 52F
02/15 03:18, 52F
推
02/15 14:02, , 53F
02/15 14:02, 53F
→
02/15 14:03, , 54F
02/15 14:03, 54F
推
02/15 15:15, , 55F
02/15 15:15, 55F
噓
02/15 16:10, , 56F
02/15 16:10, 56F
→
02/15 16:10, , 57F
02/15 16:10, 57F
推
02/15 16:15, , 58F
02/15 16:15, 58F
推
02/15 18:26, , 59F
02/15 18:26, 59F
推
02/15 21:25, , 60F
02/15 21:25, 60F
推
02/16 04:35, , 61F
02/16 04:35, 61F
推
02/16 10:01, , 62F
02/16 10:01, 62F
推
02/18 23:37, , 63F
02/18 23:37, 63F
→
02/18 23:38, , 64F
02/18 23:38, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)