Re: [討論] 拍謝 讓我在發一篇對加場的看法
看到一些人說:不要加場不要加場不要加場!
但市場上就是明顯的供不應求,
論公司角度,演唱會期間場內設備都架好了,
多唱一場,簡單來說就是多賺;
論五月天,你能說他們自私嗎?
這麼多的歌迷買不到票,加場被罵,沒加場也被罵
總是有些搶到票的五迷,自私希望不要加場,
真不懂為什麼?加不加場,與你無傷
自然會有歌迷會去填滿50000個座位的
演唱會贊助一直都是常態,
不僅五月天,沒什麼都要找贊助了一定不賺錢的說法!
變向來說:贊助商也是廣告行銷的一環,
就是魚幫水、水幫魚這種道理!
想想那些沒買到票的歌迷吧?
難道要叫我們去向黃牛低頭嗎?
我個人是寧願被相信音樂賺走啦!
※ 引述《luck8208 (胎哥是女生~)》之銘言:
: 因為這樣吵一吵就可以有糖果吃
: 還是要被說為了賺錢
: 沒人想說是為了歌迷、是疼歌迷
: 沒人想說,如果他們一場演唱會可以賺很多
: 為甚麼辦下一場還要再找贊助?
: 這不是很矛盾嗎?
: 9/8 那天 我看到大家那麼努力在排隊
: 大家都買到票了
: 我曾經買不到票一次,我在高鐵站大哭
: 但我也沒想著要加場啊!
: 這能怪誰!買票靠運氣啊!
: 怪東怪西的,什麼都沒想
: 你以為票錢真的夠補足他們一場演唱會的開銷?
: 然後根本不夠錢找贊助蓋票又要X北X母的,
: 真的很煩欸!
: 30號要看的就去看!
: 我寧願多上一天班多賺一千塊錢
: 30號意義在哪!!!
: 就只是讓你們口口聲聲說喜歡的五月天更加累一天
: 疼歌迷還要背負一些是是非非的流言
: 衰爆了!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 106.65.188.101
→
09/13 10:36, , 1F
09/13 10:36, 1F
推
09/13 10:38, , 2F
09/13 10:38, 2F
→
09/13 10:38, , 3F
09/13 10:38, 3F
→
09/13 10:38, , 4F
09/13 10:38, 4F
→
09/13 10:38, , 5F
09/13 10:38, 5F
→
09/13 10:38, , 6F
09/13 10:38, 6F
推
09/13 10:47, , 7F
09/13 10:47, 7F
推
09/13 10:50, , 8F
09/13 10:50, 8F
→
09/13 10:53, , 9F
09/13 10:53, 9F
推
09/13 10:54, , 10F
09/13 10:54, 10F
推
09/13 10:55, , 11F
09/13 10:55, 11F
→
09/13 10:55, , 12F
09/13 10:55, 12F
→
09/13 10:58, , 13F
09/13 10:58, 13F
推
09/13 11:00, , 14F
09/13 11:00, 14F
→
09/13 11:01, , 15F
09/13 11:01, 15F
→
09/13 11:03, , 16F
09/13 11:03, 16F
→
09/13 11:05, , 17F
09/13 11:05, 17F
推
09/13 11:07, , 18F
09/13 11:07, 18F
推
09/13 11:15, , 19F
09/13 11:15, 19F
推
09/13 11:16, , 20F
09/13 11:16, 20F
→
09/13 11:17, , 21F
09/13 11:17, 21F
推
09/13 11:17, , 22F
09/13 11:17, 22F
推
09/13 11:17, , 23F
09/13 11:17, 23F
推
09/13 11:17, , 24F
09/13 11:17, 24F
→
09/13 11:18, , 25F
09/13 11:18, 25F
→
09/13 11:18, , 26F
09/13 11:18, 26F
→
09/13 11:19, , 27F
09/13 11:19, 27F
推
09/13 11:19, , 28F
09/13 11:19, 28F
→
09/13 11:20, , 29F
09/13 11:20, 29F
→
09/13 11:20, , 30F
09/13 11:20, 30F
→
09/13 11:20, , 31F
09/13 11:20, 31F
→
09/13 11:21, , 32F
09/13 11:21, 32F
→
09/13 11:22, , 33F
09/13 11:22, 33F
→
09/13 11:22, , 34F
09/13 11:22, 34F
→
09/13 11:23, , 35F
09/13 11:23, 35F
推
09/13 11:23, , 36F
09/13 11:23, 36F
→
09/13 11:24, , 37F
09/13 11:24, 37F
推
09/13 11:24, , 38F
09/13 11:24, 38F
→
09/13 11:24, , 39F
09/13 11:24, 39F
→
09/13 11:24, , 40F
09/13 11:24, 40F
推
09/13 11:24, , 41F
09/13 11:24, 41F
→
09/13 11:25, , 42F
09/13 11:25, 42F
推
09/13 11:25, , 43F
09/13 11:25, 43F
推
09/13 11:25, , 44F
09/13 11:25, 44F
→
09/13 11:25, , 45F
09/13 11:25, 45F
→
09/13 11:26, , 46F
09/13 11:26, 46F
→
09/13 11:26, , 47F
09/13 11:26, 47F
→
09/13 11:26, , 48F
09/13 11:26, 48F
→
09/13 11:27, , 49F
09/13 11:27, 49F
推
09/13 11:32, , 50F
09/13 11:32, 50F
噓
09/13 12:16, , 51F
09/13 12:16, 51F
→
09/13 12:16, , 52F
09/13 12:16, 52F
→
09/13 12:16, , 53F
09/13 12:16, 53F
→
09/13 12:18, , 54F
09/13 12:18, 54F
→
09/13 12:19, , 55F
09/13 12:19, 55F
推
09/13 12:20, , 56F
09/13 12:20, 56F
推
09/13 12:20, , 57F
09/13 12:20, 57F
推
09/13 12:23, , 58F
09/13 12:23, 58F
推
09/13 13:01, , 59F
09/13 13:01, 59F
噓
09/13 13:18, , 60F
09/13 13:18, 60F
→
09/13 13:42, , 61F
09/13 13:42, 61F
→
09/13 13:42, , 62F
09/13 13:42, 62F
→
09/13 14:40, , 63F
09/13 14:40, 63F
→
09/13 14:40, , 64F
09/13 14:40, 64F
→
09/13 14:42, , 65F
09/13 14:42, 65F
噓
09/13 16:44, , 66F
09/13 16:44, 66F
噓
09/13 18:06, , 67F
09/13 18:06, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 10 篇):