Re: [外電] Spurs-Mavericks Preview
看板Mavericks作者DevinJosh (Devin&Josh)時間12年前 (2012/01/30 22:40)推噓15(15推 0噓 50→)留言65則, 13人參與討論串3/11 (看更多)
※ 引述《DM24Tim (黃金右腳)》之銘言:
: 標題: [外電] Spurs-Mavericks Preview
: 時間: Sun Jan 29 13:51:29 2012
: → Royalweger :波霸可能往SG方向養比較好~他控球實在不太行 01/29 14:16
: 推 BILL6042665 :少跳投 多切傳~ 01/29 14:25
: 推 DevinJosh :現在的頂尖PG好像都有SG特質 DW CP3 Rondo Rose等 01/29 17:49
: → DevinJosh :照潮流來看 波霸打控球其實還滿行的 01/29 17:50
: → nowitzki41 :其他三個我是沒意見..軟豆的sg特質在哪=.=? 01/29 18:17
: 推 DevinJosh :Rondo切入很強呀 今年平均有15pts耶 01/29 19:06
: 推 Chenwitzki :不過亂抖還是偏傳統PG比較多 01/29 19:48
: → Royalweger :偏傳統PG指的是他投籃差嗎XD~ 01/29 20:29
: → Royalweger :現在就乾脆讓波霸打SG吧~或許切入就會變多了 01/29 20:31
: 推 Chenwitzki :波霸似乎真的打SG比PG好 01/29 20:51
: → Chenwitzki :非傳統PG是得分能力很強的PG 靠自己的得分能力做出 01/29 20:52
: → Chenwitzki :空檔 用得分的方式幫助球隊比跑戰術組織更有效 01/29 20:55
: → Chenwitzki :個人見解有誤請指正 個人認知Rondo屬於地板型控衛 01/29 20:55
: → Chenwitzki :像Rubio也比較偏向傳統型的PG吧 01/29 20:57
: 推 BILL6042665 :也認為SG較適合 進攻專心進攻 防守專心防守 控制節奏 01/29 21:01
: → BILL6042665 :和組織這件事對他似乎太過複雜 01/29 21:02
: 推 DevinJosh :也是啦 Rondo投籃不是很穩 01/30 16:07
查了一下wiki,我說Rondo有SG特質是錯的,抱歉了
根據"The Basketball Handbook" 作者Lee Rose
參考他對Point Guard所作的定義
節錄如下:
A point guard as a coach on the floor, who can handle and distribute the ball
to teammates.
It also states that the more speed a point guard has,
the more likely he will be able to create separation and space off the dribble,
which allows the point guard room to work.
也就是說PG的組織能力,是建立在速度上,速度愈快愈能有效組織
像Rondo Kidd這種切入很強的球員 就可以被歸類為PG
他們靠速度製造出空檔與傳導空間 當對方不協防時當然就單吃對手 上去得分啦
Point guards should also be vocal floor leaders, and should discuss
rule interpretations with officials.
A point guard must always know the time on both the shot clock and
the game clock, the score, the number of timeouts for both teams,
and whom to foul late in the game.
因為看到推文補充一段關於"控制節奏"
1.space off the dribble-->這不是在場上的控制節奏嗎? ex.CP3
2.able to create separation-->在不是在場上以速度製造進攻機會嗎? ex.Nash
3.discuss rule interpretations with officials
4.must always know
(1)the time on the shot clock
(2)the time on the game clock
(3)the score
(4)the number of timeouts for both teams
(5)whom to foul late in the game
其實他定義就有控制節奏的部分了,而且應該比大部分版友想的還多
當紅PG與傳統定義不同的部分 應該是在投射能力
板友提到的非傳統PG 或許可以稱為雙能衛
譬如:Derrick Rose, Deron Williams, Chris Paul, Jason Terry(原本是控球)
我們應該都看過他們盤球與切傳 P&R也算 這很接近上面第一點與第二點
另外還會有切入禁區與三分投射 這是SG的部分
他們其實兩個位置都能打 但除非有隊上有另一位明星級傳統PG(Kidd Rondo) 否則很難
像Jet本來是打PG 因為Kidd到來加上隊上缺SG 才轉打SG
而他雙能的特性彌補了Kidd在組織進攻上缺乏速度的弱點
所以可以常常看到Kidd過半場後 邊盤球邊等Jet跑位接球
當Jet開始盤球.切傳.跳投 打PG的Kidd搖身一變成為三分射手(SG)
小牛這樣的後場組合其實還滿特別的
至於Shooting Guard的定義
節錄如下:
A shooting guard as someone whose primary role is to score points.
As the name suggests, most shooting guards are good long-range shooters,
typically averaging 35–40 percent from three point range.
Many shooting guards are also strong and athletic, and have the ability
to get inside the paint and drive to the basket.
SG要有很好的三分投射能力 所以我說Rondo有SG特質就錯啦
波霸如果打這位置就太浪費他的速度了 況且他投射能力也還不夠穩
目前這幾場看他切傳的視野還OK
而且他好像是屬於需要控球時間那型
像這種有速度的球員 拿去當射手不一定比較準 至少是浪費了速度的天賦
總之最近他的表現還滿值得誇獎
希望他可以持續進步
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.231.55.31
→
01/30 22:42, , 1F
01/30 22:42, 1F
→
01/30 22:42, , 2F
01/30 22:42, 2F
→
01/30 22:47, , 3F
01/30 22:47, 3F
推
01/30 22:58, , 4F
01/30 22:58, 4F
→
01/30 22:59, , 5F
01/30 22:59, 5F
→
01/30 23:00, , 6F
01/30 23:00, 6F
→
01/30 23:01, , 7F
01/30 23:01, 7F
→
01/30 23:01, , 8F
01/30 23:01, 8F
→
01/30 23:05, , 9F
01/30 23:05, 9F
→
01/30 23:05, , 10F
01/30 23:05, 10F
→
01/30 23:16, , 11F
01/30 23:16, 11F
推
01/30 23:24, , 12F
01/30 23:24, 12F
→
01/30 23:24, , 13F
01/30 23:24, 13F
推
01/30 23:24, , 14F
01/30 23:24, 14F
→
01/30 23:25, , 15F
01/30 23:25, 15F
推
01/30 23:28, , 16F
01/30 23:28, 16F
→
01/30 23:28, , 17F
01/30 23:28, 17F
→
01/30 23:29, , 18F
01/30 23:29, 18F
→
01/30 23:29, , 19F
01/30 23:29, 19F
→
01/30 23:29, , 20F
01/30 23:29, 20F
推
01/30 23:35, , 21F
01/30 23:35, 21F
推
01/30 23:36, , 22F
01/30 23:36, 22F
→
01/30 23:36, , 23F
01/30 23:36, 23F
→
01/30 23:38, , 24F
01/30 23:38, 24F
→
01/30 23:39, , 25F
01/30 23:39, 25F
→
01/30 23:41, , 26F
01/30 23:41, 26F
→
01/30 23:42, , 27F
01/30 23:42, 27F
→
01/30 23:44, , 28F
01/30 23:44, 28F
→
01/30 23:46, , 29F
01/30 23:46, 29F
→
01/30 23:46, , 30F
01/30 23:46, 30F
推
01/30 23:47, , 31F
01/30 23:47, 31F
→
01/30 23:48, , 32F
01/30 23:48, 32F
→
01/30 23:48, , 33F
01/30 23:48, 33F
→
01/30 23:48, , 34F
01/30 23:48, 34F
→
01/30 23:48, , 35F
01/30 23:48, 35F
→
01/30 23:49, , 36F
01/30 23:49, 36F
→
01/30 23:50, , 37F
01/30 23:50, 37F
→
01/30 23:51, , 38F
01/30 23:51, 38F
→
01/30 23:51, , 39F
01/30 23:51, 39F
推
01/30 23:56, , 40F
01/30 23:56, 40F
→
01/30 23:59, , 41F
01/30 23:59, 41F
→
01/31 00:00, , 42F
01/31 00:00, 42F
→
01/31 00:01, , 43F
01/31 00:01, 43F
→
01/31 00:02, , 44F
01/31 00:02, 44F
推
01/31 00:03, , 45F
01/31 00:03, 45F
→
01/31 00:03, , 46F
01/31 00:03, 46F
→
01/31 00:04, , 47F
01/31 00:04, 47F
→
01/31 00:04, , 48F
01/31 00:04, 48F
→
01/31 00:04, , 49F
01/31 00:04, 49F
→
01/31 00:06, , 50F
01/31 00:06, 50F
推
01/31 00:07, , 51F
01/31 00:07, 51F
→
01/31 00:08, , 52F
01/31 00:08, 52F
推
01/31 00:15, , 53F
01/31 00:15, 53F
→
01/31 00:16, , 54F
01/31 00:16, 54F
→
01/31 00:16, , 55F
01/31 00:16, 55F
推
01/31 01:11, , 56F
01/31 01:11, 56F
推
01/31 01:16, , 57F
01/31 01:16, 57F
→
01/31 01:18, , 58F
01/31 01:18, 58F
→
01/31 01:18, , 59F
01/31 01:18, 59F
→
01/31 01:20, , 60F
01/31 01:20, 60F
→
01/31 01:24, , 61F
01/31 01:24, 61F
→
01/31 01:25, , 62F
01/31 01:25, 62F
※ 編輯: DevinJosh 來自: 122.125.46.148 (01/31 08:58)
推
01/31 08:40, , 63F
01/31 08:40, 63F
→
01/31 08:41, , 64F
01/31 08:41, 64F
推
01/31 20:20, , 65F
01/31 20:20, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 11 篇):