[討論]怎能片面的說部分傳武是體操呢
※ 引述《errantknight (不問歲月任風歌)》之銘言:
: 標題: Re: [討論] 傳武必須面對訓練程序的缺漏
: 時間: Wed Sep 12 14:03:59 2012
:
: → errantknight:問題我也說了 就是社團的傳武是體操 118.167.243.68 09/13 01:29
: → errantknight:但是這邊的人多半以為那樣就是傳武 118.167.243.68 09/13 01:29
: → errantknight:明明練的是體操偏不承認本身就是問題 118.167.243.68 09/13 01:43
我完全不同意erran這樣的講法,傳武沒有專利註冊,不能夠要求"你認可,或者特定組織
認可"之後,才能夠叫傳武;也不能夠說一定要練多少時數,練出多少功力之後才能夠叫
傳武。這是沒道理的。
比方說下面這一位執行長老師,南少林拳師太祖拳。南少林拳洪拳,皆師傳自於王敬德
http://kungfu1010.pixnet.net/blog/post/16765461
你難道可以依他的練習狀況,實際功力說他練的是非國術嘛?
你難道可以依他的練習狀況,實際功力說他練的是體操嘛?
當然不行,我想任何人都沒有這個資格跟權力。只要是打著傳武招牌
特別是清楚註明介紹師承的,他要自稱國術,沒有人有資格說他練的其實是體操。
再說,看起來這位執行長老師跟王敬德可是有擔任台大國術社比賽的評審喔!
http://kungfu1010.pixnet.net/blog/post/23411351
我不知道類似這樣的擔任活動評審或擔任老師有沒有車馬費,如果有的話,那他們可是
受過官方機構認證,值得給付納稅人血汗錢的人物哩!!他們社團開宗明義寫國術社
你erran偏偏要說社團練的是不是國術是體操,那校方付錢(如果有)的話,啟不是付錯對象
了嘛???這怎麼說都不通啊!!
是以,抱歉我無法同意erran桑您的觀點。
--
別以為我是戰鬥力兩千的廢柴
我從地球人那學會了控制氣的技巧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.170.208.218
推
09/13 08:47, , 1F
09/13 08:47, 1F
推
09/13 08:59, , 2F
09/13 08:59, 2F
推
09/13 09:01, , 3F
09/13 09:01, 3F
→
09/13 09:10, , 4F
09/13 09:10, 4F
→
09/13 09:18, , 5F
09/13 09:18, 5F
→
09/13 09:23, , 6F
09/13 09:23, 6F
→
09/13 09:24, , 7F
09/13 09:24, 7F
→
09/13 09:25, , 8F
09/13 09:25, 8F
→
09/13 09:26, , 9F
09/13 09:26, 9F
→
09/13 09:27, , 10F
09/13 09:27, 10F
→
09/13 09:28, , 11F
09/13 09:28, 11F
→
09/13 09:29, , 12F
09/13 09:29, 12F
→
09/13 09:31, , 13F
09/13 09:31, 13F
→
09/13 09:32, , 14F
09/13 09:32, 14F
→
09/13 09:38, , 15F
09/13 09:38, 15F
→
09/13 09:40, , 16F
09/13 09:40, 16F
→
09/13 09:42, , 17F
09/13 09:42, 17F
→
09/13 09:48, , 18F
09/13 09:48, 18F
→
09/13 09:49, , 19F
09/13 09:49, 19F
→
09/13 09:50, , 20F
09/13 09:50, 20F
→
09/13 09:52, , 21F
09/13 09:52, 21F
→
09/13 09:54, , 22F
09/13 09:54, 22F
→
09/13 09:55, , 23F
09/13 09:55, 23F
→
09/13 09:56, , 24F
09/13 09:56, 24F
→
09/13 09:58, , 25F
09/13 09:58, 25F
→
09/13 09:59, , 26F
09/13 09:59, 26F
噓
09/13 11:35, , 27F
09/13 11:35, 27F
→
09/13 22:09, , 28F
09/13 22:09, 28F
→
09/13 22:10, , 29F
09/13 22:10, 29F
→
09/13 22:11, , 30F
09/13 22:11, 30F
→
09/13 22:14, , 31F
09/13 22:14, 31F
→
09/13 22:15, , 32F
09/13 22:15, 32F
→
09/13 22:37, , 33F
09/13 22:37, 33F
→
09/13 22:38, , 34F
09/13 22:38, 34F
→
09/13 22:41, , 35F
09/13 22:41, 35F
→
09/13 22:41, , 36F
09/13 22:41, 36F
推
09/13 23:00, , 37F
09/13 23:00, 37F
→
09/13 23:00, , 38F
09/13 23:00, 38F
→
09/13 23:01, , 39F
09/13 23:01, 39F
→
09/13 23:02, , 40F
09/13 23:02, 40F
→
09/13 23:02, , 41F
09/13 23:02, 41F
→
09/13 23:03, , 42F
09/13 23:03, 42F
→
09/13 23:03, , 43F
09/13 23:03, 43F
→
09/13 23:19, , 44F
09/13 23:19, 44F
推
09/13 23:29, , 45F
09/13 23:29, 45F
推
09/14 00:27, , 46F
09/14 00:27, 46F
推
09/14 00:52, , 47F
09/14 00:52, 47F
推
09/14 01:28, , 48F
09/14 01:28, 48F
→
09/14 01:28, , 49F
09/14 01:28, 49F
推
09/14 01:48, , 50F
09/14 01:48, 50F
推
09/14 02:44, , 51F
09/14 02:44, 51F
→
09/14 06:41, , 52F
09/14 06:41, 52F
→
09/14 06:45, , 53F
09/14 06:45, 53F
→
09/14 06:46, , 54F
09/14 06:46, 54F
→
09/14 06:47, , 55F
09/14 06:47, 55F
→
09/14 06:48, , 56F
09/14 06:48, 56F
→
09/14 06:49, , 57F
09/14 06:49, 57F
→
09/14 06:51, , 58F
09/14 06:51, 58F
→
09/14 08:07, , 59F
09/14 08:07, 59F
推
09/14 11:13, , 60F
09/14 11:13, 60F
→
09/14 11:13, , 61F
09/14 11:13, 61F
→
09/14 11:14, , 62F
09/14 11:14, 62F
→
09/14 11:14, , 63F
09/14 11:14, 63F
→
09/14 11:15, , 64F
09/14 11:15, 64F
→
09/14 11:15, , 65F
09/14 11:15, 65F
→
09/14 11:16, , 66F
09/14 11:16, 66F
→
09/14 11:17, , 67F
09/14 11:17, 67F
推
09/14 11:19, , 68F
09/14 11:19, 68F
→
09/14 11:20, , 69F
09/14 11:20, 69F
→
09/14 11:20, , 70F
09/14 11:20, 70F
→
09/14 11:20, , 71F
09/14 11:20, 71F
→
09/14 11:21, , 72F
09/14 11:21, 72F
→
09/14 11:21, , 73F
09/14 11:21, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)