Re: [閒聊] 媽媽嘴咖啡
※ 引述《weichipedia (惡墮★小埋騎士)》之銘言:
: 民事判老闆要賠,用的理由還蠻怪的,
: 看了一下推文,有人說是繼受德國民法的通病?
: 民法對過失沒有明文定義,這案看起來像是最高院擴張解釋惹
: 有沒有八卦?
又是個法盲,民粹酸民
講過一百遍了,先去看判決書好嗎?
沒看過判決書就只會嘴法官,你是考得上司法官嗎?
--
每個朋友擅長的事都不一樣的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.25.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Marginalman/M.1498142461.A.2AF.html
推
06/22 22:41, , 1F
06/22 22:41, 1F
推
06/22 22:42, , 2F
06/22 22:42, 2F
推
06/22 22:42, , 3F
06/22 22:42, 3F
→
06/22 22:42, , 4F
06/22 22:42, 4F
→
06/22 22:42, , 5F
06/22 22:42, 5F
推
06/22 22:43, , 6F
06/22 22:43, 6F
→
06/22 22:43, , 7F
06/22 22:43, 7F
→
06/22 22:44, , 8F
06/22 22:44, 8F
→
06/22 22:45, , 9F
06/22 22:45, 9F
推
06/22 22:45, , 10F
06/22 22:45, 10F
推
06/22 22:47, , 11F
06/22 22:47, 11F
推
06/22 22:50, , 12F
06/22 22:50, 12F
→
06/22 22:50, , 13F
06/22 22:50, 13F
討論串 (同標題文章)