西洽是不是有雙重標準?
這篇戰女文爛梗,被噓爆
https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1493358208.A.269.html
可是我這篇動朋文更廢,卻......
https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1493364281.A.079.html
這是雙重標準嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.139.72.67
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Marginalman/M.1493366084.A.326.html
→
04/28 15:55, , 1F
04/28 15:55, 1F
→
04/28 15:56, , 2F
04/28 15:56, 2F
推
04/28 15:56, , 3F
04/28 15:56, 3F
→
04/28 15:57, , 4F
04/28 15:57, 4F
→
04/28 15:57, , 5F
04/28 15:57, 5F
→
04/28 15:57, , 6F
04/28 15:57, 6F
→
04/28 15:58, , 7F
04/28 15:58, 7F
→
04/28 16:00, , 8F
04/28 16:00, 8F
→
04/28 16:02, , 9F
04/28 16:02, 9F
推
04/28 16:03, , 10F
04/28 16:03, 10F
推
04/28 16:04, , 11F
04/28 16:04, 11F
→
04/28 16:04, , 12F
04/28 16:04, 12F
→
04/28 16:06, , 13F
04/28 16:06, 13F
→
04/28 16:08, , 14F
04/28 16:08, 14F
推
04/28 16:12, , 15F
04/28 16:12, 15F
→
04/28 16:13, , 16F
04/28 16:13, 16F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):