Re: [心得] NPH卡價(討論非瑞克西亞抹煞獸)
看板Magic作者Romulus (R. Urakagi Ts'ai)時間14年前 (2011/05/02 20:46)推噓33(33推 0噓 31→)留言64則, 24人參與討論串3/4 (看更多)
: → j3307002:基本上控制都會比快攻的招多 05/02 17:12
: → j3307002:通常會被大家傳頌千古的套牌好比深藍都是控制套牌 05/02 17:12
本日最好笑
深藍是MTG史上最兇惡的組合技套牌之一,不知道什麼時候變成控制套牌
說不定吸血鬼和鬼怪也是控制套牌,難怪快攻已死(其實根本沒有套牌被分類為快攻對吧
有鑑於自稱4版就開始玩得人都搞不清楚情況,板上已經有被貼過的link再貼一次
大學院深藍 - 1998年羅馬PT冠軍
http://blog.yam.com/obelisk066/article/17930981
另外這是日文MTG wiki的介紹,其實我只是想節錄翻譯其中一段:
http://mtgwiki.com/wiki/MoMa
現在的比賽分為三個步驟。
第一步驟(前期)是丟硬幣。
第二步驟(中期)是再調度判斷。
第三步驟(後期)──是先手第一回合。
2-4回合就可以幹掉對手的控制套牌,真是有夠可怕的
==
順帶一提被大家傳頌千古的快攻套牌我直接就想到:
史賴、自殺黑、瘋魔、共鳴、仇視綠、Zoo、Boros、Jund
劇變白這種控制要素比較大的就算了
連我這種看戲居多的都印象深刻
: → j3307002:我說快攻已死或許太偏激,但大家應該要想看似偏激理論 05/02 17:14
: → j3307002:背後隱藏的意義,而不是去戰語氣或構築賽積分 05/02 17:15
背後隱藏的意義就是你不懂裝懂又很愛放砲
That's all.
--
聽說把blog分類比較有人看 ._.a
主(雜)blog http://urakagi.blogspot.com/
日文blog http://urakagij.blogspot.com/
英文blog http://urakagie.blogspot.com/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.130.10.97
推
05/02 20:47, , 1F
05/02 20:47, 1F
→
05/02 20:47, , 2F
05/02 20:47, 2F
推
05/02 20:48, , 3F
05/02 20:48, 3F
→
05/02 20:50, , 4F
05/02 20:50, 4F
→
05/02 20:58, , 5F
05/02 20:58, 5F
→
05/02 20:59, , 6F
05/02 20:59, 6F
推
05/02 20:59, , 7F
05/02 20:59, 7F
→
05/02 21:00, , 8F
05/02 21:00, 8F
→
05/02 21:00, , 9F
05/02 21:00, 9F
※ 編輯: Romulus 來自: 220.130.10.97 (05/02 21:01)
→
05/02 21:01, , 10F
05/02 21:01, 10F
→
05/02 21:01, , 11F
05/02 21:01, 11F
推
05/02 21:02, , 12F
05/02 21:02, 12F
推
05/02 21:02, , 13F
05/02 21:02, 13F
→
05/02 21:02, , 14F
05/02 21:02, 14F
→
05/02 21:02, , 15F
05/02 21:02, 15F
→
05/02 21:03, , 16F
05/02 21:03, 16F
→
05/02 21:03, , 17F
05/02 21:03, 17F
→
05/02 21:03, , 18F
05/02 21:03, 18F
推
05/02 21:04, , 19F
05/02 21:04, 19F
推
05/02 21:04, , 20F
05/02 21:04, 20F
→
05/02 21:07, , 21F
05/02 21:07, 21F
→
05/02 21:08, , 22F
05/02 21:08, 22F
推
05/02 21:13, , 23F
05/02 21:13, 23F
推
05/02 21:13, , 24F
05/02 21:13, 24F
推
05/02 21:22, , 25F
05/02 21:22, 25F
→
05/02 21:22, , 26F
05/02 21:22, 26F
→
05/02 21:23, , 27F
05/02 21:23, 27F
推
05/02 21:24, , 28F
05/02 21:24, 28F
推
05/02 21:24, , 29F
05/02 21:24, 29F
→
05/02 21:26, , 30F
05/02 21:26, 30F
→
05/02 21:26, , 31F
05/02 21:26, 31F
→
05/02 21:27, , 32F
05/02 21:27, 32F
→
05/02 21:28, , 33F
05/02 21:28, 33F
→
05/02 21:29, , 34F
05/02 21:29, 34F
→
05/02 21:33, , 35F
05/02 21:33, 35F
推
05/02 21:36, , 36F
05/02 21:36, 36F
推
05/02 21:40, , 37F
05/02 21:40, 37F
推
05/02 21:40, , 38F
05/02 21:40, 38F
→
05/02 21:41, , 39F
05/02 21:41, 39F
推
05/02 21:41, , 40F
05/02 21:41, 40F
→
05/02 21:42, , 41F
05/02 21:42, 41F
→
05/02 21:43, , 42F
05/02 21:43, 42F
推
05/02 21:44, , 43F
05/02 21:44, 43F
→
05/02 21:47, , 44F
05/02 21:47, 44F
推
05/02 21:52, , 45F
05/02 21:52, 45F
推
05/02 22:02, , 46F
05/02 22:02, 46F
→
05/02 22:04, , 47F
05/02 22:04, 47F
推
05/02 22:06, , 48F
05/02 22:06, 48F
推
05/02 22:10, , 49F
05/02 22:10, 49F
推
05/02 23:22, , 50F
05/02 23:22, 50F
推
05/02 23:52, , 51F
05/02 23:52, 51F
推
05/02 23:58, , 52F
05/02 23:58, 52F
推
05/03 00:00, , 53F
05/03 00:00, 53F
→
05/03 00:01, , 54F
05/03 00:01, 54F
推
05/03 00:03, , 55F
05/03 00:03, 55F
推
05/03 00:03, , 56F
05/03 00:03, 56F
推
05/03 00:12, , 57F
05/03 00:12, 57F
→
05/03 00:17, , 58F
05/03 00:17, 58F
推
05/03 00:58, , 59F
05/03 00:58, 59F
推
05/03 02:10, , 60F
05/03 02:10, 60F
推
05/03 02:17, , 61F
05/03 02:17, 61F
推
05/03 02:33, , 62F
05/03 02:33, 62F
→
05/03 08:40, , 63F
05/03 08:40, 63F
推
05/03 12:44, , 64F
05/03 12:44, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):