Re: [情報] Cano:"洋基根本不尊重我"
※ 引述《ChrisDavis (工業電風扇)》之銘言:
: Robinson Cano felt the New York Yankees lacked in their effort to re-sign him
: this offseason.
: "I didn't feel respect. I didn't get respect from them and I didn't see any
: effort," Cano said.
: Cano said he didn't think he'd leave New York, but the Yankees didn't appear
: to want him back.
: New York's top offer was $175 million over seven years. The Seattle Mariners
: gave Cano a 10-year, $240 million deal.
: Cano表示:"我感受不到尊重"
: "我完全沒有得到他們的尊重而且也沒看到在我身上下功夫"
: Cano沒想過他會離開洋基,但是洋基沒甚麼意思想帶他回來
季賽我想Cano的成績無庸置疑,若能穩定維持當下的成績 絕對是名人堂級的選手
但洋基如果想在季後賽走得更遠,清除掉Cano是必須的
Avg.222 OBP.267 SLG.419 OPS .686
你沒看錯,這就是Cano在季後賽打出來的生涯成績
就是個二流的鳥蛋打者
數據會說話 如果你季後賽打線排了一堆軟手咖
例如前幾年的 Cano-Teixeira-Swisher
季後賽生涯打擊率 三個加起來僅僅是0.222+0.222+0.165 = 0.61
三個人加起來剛好過0.6而已,也難怪在投手沒辦法完封的情況下
洋基09以後 季後賽沒辦法走得更遠就是因為這樣
更何況在Jeter (OPS 0.838) A-Rod (OPS 0.833)越來越老的情況下
火力支援勢必比以往微弱
所以在考慮季後賽的情況下 洋基不是那麼尊重Cano也是很正常的
畢竟就是個二流打者(季後賽)
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.68.58.73
推
12/14 01:41, , 1F
12/14 01:41, 1F
噓
12/14 01:41, , 2F
12/14 01:41, 2F
推
12/14 01:42, , 3F
12/14 01:42, 3F
還是比Cano強
→
12/14 01:42, , 4F
12/14 01:42, 4F
噓
12/14 01:42, , 5F
12/14 01:42, 5F
→
12/14 01:42, , 6F
12/14 01:42, 6F
我想Cano季後賽是穩定的烙賽 你可以預期的
→
12/14 01:42, , 7F
12/14 01:42, 7F
推
12/14 01:43, , 8F
12/14 01:43, 8F
→
12/14 01:43, , 9F
12/14 01:43, 9F
推
12/14 01:45, , 10F
12/14 01:45, 10F
噓
12/14 01:46, , 11F
12/14 01:46, 11F
洋基又不是沒其他洞
難不成補個季賽王 打進季後賽 然後看中心打者烙賽四場就打包回家很好嗎
→
12/14 01:47, , 12F
12/14 01:47, 12F
洋基又不是沒補強其他位置
而且今年有Cano也沒進去啊 又不是有Cano就100%進去季後賽
既然要賭就要多方兼顧
噓
12/14 01:49, , 13F
12/14 01:49, 13F
已修正
噓
12/14 01:49, , 14F
12/14 01:49, 14F
推
12/14 01:49, , 15F
12/14 01:49, 15F
數據會說話 你擺九個生涯OPS 0.6的 能給投手的支援就那樣
又不是每一隊都是01響尾蛇
→
12/14 01:50, , 16F
12/14 01:50, 16F
噓
12/14 01:51, , 17F
12/14 01:51, 17F
噓
12/14 01:53, , 18F
12/14 01:53, 18F
→
12/14 01:53, , 19F
12/14 01:53, 19F
→
12/14 01:53, , 20F
12/14 01:53, 20F
季後賽又不是靠Cano
推
12/14 01:54, , 21F
12/14 01:54, 21F
噓
12/14 01:54, , 22F
12/14 01:54, 22F
噓
12/14 01:54, , 23F
12/14 01:54, 23F
推
12/14 01:54, , 24F
12/14 01:54, 24F
→
12/14 01:55, , 25F
12/14 01:55, 25F
→
12/14 01:55, , 26F
12/14 01:55, 26F
→
12/14 01:56, , 27F
12/14 01:56, 27F
→
12/14 01:56, , 28F
12/14 01:56, 28F
→
12/14 01:57, , 29F
12/14 01:57, 29F
噓
12/14 01:57, , 30F
12/14 01:57, 30F
噓
12/14 01:58, , 31F
12/14 01:58, 31F
A-ROD 不算09以後 季後賽至少也是OPS 0.7以上的一般打者噢
遠勝Cano
迷迷如果有A-ROD軟手的錯誤印象 應該是從王建民才開始看
還有 55 則推文
還有 9 段內文
推
12/14 04:45, , 87F
12/14 04:45, 87F
→
12/14 05:45, , 88F
12/14 05:45, 88F
噓
12/14 06:02, , 89F
12/14 06:02, 89F
推
12/14 06:16, , 90F
12/14 06:16, 90F
→
12/14 06:16, , 91F
12/14 06:16, 91F
推
12/14 06:21, , 92F
12/14 06:21, 92F
推
12/14 08:02, , 93F
12/14 08:02, 93F
推
12/14 08:07, , 94F
12/14 08:07, 94F
噓
12/14 08:07, , 95F
12/14 08:07, 95F
→
12/14 08:07, , 96F
12/14 08:07, 96F
噓
12/14 08:21, , 97F
12/14 08:21, 97F
推
12/14 08:56, , 98F
12/14 08:56, 98F
推
12/14 09:13, , 99F
12/14 09:13, 99F
噓
12/14 09:41, , 100F
12/14 09:41, 100F
噓
12/14 10:54, , 101F
12/14 10:54, 101F
噓
12/14 12:00, , 102F
12/14 12:00, 102F
推
12/14 12:02, , 103F
12/14 12:02, 103F
噓
12/14 13:04, , 104F
12/14 13:04, 104F
噓
12/14 14:16, , 105F
12/14 14:16, 105F
推
12/14 14:17, , 106F
12/14 14:17, 106F
噓
12/14 16:27, , 107F
12/14 16:27, 107F
推
12/14 16:37, , 108F
12/14 16:37, 108F
噓
12/14 17:42, , 109F
12/14 17:42, 109F
噓
12/14 17:51, , 110F
12/14 17:51, 110F
噓
12/14 18:27, , 111F
12/14 18:27, 111F
噓
12/14 18:54, , 112F
12/14 18:54, 112F
噓
12/14 21:41, , 113F
12/14 21:41, 113F
→
12/14 21:42, , 114F
12/14 21:42, 114F
→
12/14 21:43, , 115F
12/14 21:43, 115F
→
12/14 21:43, , 116F
12/14 21:43, 116F
更多的洞+Cano就能進季後賽? 那今年怎沒進
噓
12/14 23:49, , 117F
12/14 23:49, 117F
從Cano出道以來 沒在洋基有這麼影響力過
推
12/15 01:14, , 118F
12/15 01:14, 118F
→
12/15 01:14, , 119F
12/15 01:14, 119F
嗯 錦上添花 當然這花挺大的
除了2012比較膠著以外 2011 2010 洋基勝差領先都在五以上
沒他 只要補個聯盟平均的二壘手 也是穩穩地進
離洋基沒Cano 就不要想進季後賽這種誇張的說法 顯然有點距離
不是Cano弱 是隊友夠強
→
12/15 10:35, , 120F
12/15 10:35, 120F
推
12/15 14:48, , 121F
12/15 14:48, 121F
說他季賽有名人堂等級也叫hater XD
※ 編輯: duncan6502 來自: 219.68.58.73 (12/15 16:36)
→
12/26 18:41,
5年前
, 122F
12/26 18:41, 122F
討論串 (同標題文章)