Re: [外電] Magic Johnson表示道奇不會去追cano

看板MLB作者freesoul (尋找生命的出口)時間12年前 (2013/10/05 02:38)推噓8(8推 0噓 1→)

留言9則, 9人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《westterry170 (密西西北)》之銘言： : Magic Johnson says the Dodgers aren’t going after Robinson Cano : Aaron Gleeman Oct 4, 2013, 10:15 AM EDT : Reports of Robinson Cano wanting a $300 million contract led to speculation : that the big-budget Dodgers might try to steal him away from the big-budget : Yankees, but Los Angeles owner Magic Johnson threw a bunch of cold water on : that idea yesterday. : 報導指出cano想要份300M的合約，這大約使人推測高預算的道奇可能會嘗試去把他從高 : 預算的洋基給搶來，但昨日道奇隊老闆Magic Johnson針對這個想法潑了個大冷水。 : Speaking to a group of reporters before Game 1 of the NLDS last night, : Johnson said: : 昨晚NLDS第一場賽前Johnson對大批記者說道：這裡的a group翻成大批不太適當，一般新聞稿說a group of reporters通常只是說多於一個，翻成"一些記者"就好 : When you’ve got to pay Clayton [Kershaw], there’s only so much you can do. : I can’t say anything because that’s not up to just me. But a year or two : from now, we’ve got Hanley [Ramirez] coming up, too. We’ve got guys that we : ’ve got to keep, and so the numbers probably just don’t add up. … I can’t : talk about the other guy [Cano], but you already know that guy in New York is : going to be paid. Not by us. But he’s going to get paid : 當你必須去支付Kershaw，你能做的事也就只能那麼多。我無法說什麼因為這不僅是我一人 : 所能決定。但這過去這一兩年至今，我們也獲得Ramirez加盟效力。我們必須去維持住我們 : 得到的這些夥伴，所以成員很可能無法再增加... 我無法去談論cano，但你知道他在紐約 : 會被雇用，並不是我們，而是他會去尋求雇用。這段錯的地方很多: "But a year or two from now we've got Hanley coming up, too" => "接下來一兩年我們還有Hanley Ramirez要換約" 這是未來不是過去 "We've got guys that we've got to keep, and so the numbers probaly just don't add up" => "我們有現有一定得留的球員，所以錢大概不夠再多簽什麼大約" the numbers probably don't add up不能直接照字義翻 "You already know that guy in NY is going to be paid. Not by us. But he's going to get paid" => "你知道紐約那傢伙會拿到大約，這約不會是我們給的，但他會拿到大約" Magic Johnoson並沒有說他一定認為NYY會給Cano大約，get paid在這裡就是指拿大約這件事不是被雇用 : Obviously quotes in early October by a part owner not involved in actually : player moves aren’t exactly binding, but we may have finally seen the first : signs of the Dodgers actually having some payroll limits. And if the Dodgers : aren’t in there driving up the bidding, how is Cano going to get to $300 : million? : 很顯然地，十月初期合夥人的引述說他們不實際參與球員交易不必確切地遵守。但我們最 : 終可能看到道奇的新合約可會受到薪資總額而限制。假如道奇不幫忙抬價，cano要如何去 : 尋獲300M? "Obviously quotes in early Oct by a part owner not involved in actually player moves aren't exactly binding" =>"當然一個不實際參予球員交易的球團老闆/合夥人在十月初的放話不一定要當真" (這裡原文還有文法錯誤...XD) "we may have finally seen the first signs of the Dodgers actually having some payroll limits" =>"我們總算知道躲人還是有薪資上限的" : 引文出處：http://ppt.cc/9ybx : 備註：有些語句不是很確定，歡迎指正!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 141.214.44.113

推

westterry170

10/05 02:42, , 1^F

10/05 02:42, 1^F

推

mp39999

10/05 04:01, , 2^F

10/05 04:01, 2^F

推

mrkey

10/05 05:12, , 3^F

10/05 05:12, 3^F