Re: [外電] Buchholz was cheating, but that's okay

看板MLB作者 (希望你在這裡)時間11年前 (2013/05/11 17:26), 編輯推噓27(3811173)
留言222則, 38人參與, 最新討論串3/8 (看更多)

05/11 10:27,
有夠沒品 還開心就好咧
05/11 10:27

05/11 10:28,
RogerWaters大大沒有興趣翻譯這篇
05/11 10:28

05/11 11:06,
RogerWaters:看來案情真的是一點都不單純...
05/11 11:06
既然有人指名要翻譯 這篇也來自HardballTalk http://0rz.tw/5S1IP 即便就算有90%的投手都在用防曬油加滑石粉, 來增加握球... 也不會證明用防曬油就是可以的, 就是不違法的, 那要不要下次放一罐在投手丘旁 那塗凡士林在手上, 可不可以呢?? 所以Hayhurst說的用防曬油不是幾乎要破案了。 但問題依照棒球規則 用異物到球上就是有問題的。 就算90%的投手都用了, 那沒用的10%呢? Jeff Passan的報導表示: "投手們不認為這是作弊??" 問題是那是用的投手們認為不是在作弊, 但依棒球規則呢??? 用異物就是犯規 如果大家認為用防曬油不是作弊, 要不要請記者問他Buchholz手臂那團亮亮的是什麼, 他要不要公開承認就是防曬油呢? 如果Jeff Passan說的都是對的, 怎麼不敢列名是那些投手在用防曬油呢??? http://0rz.tw/5S1IP 90 percent of pitchers are using spray-on sunscreen, Buchholz-style Craig Calcaterra May 8, 2013, 3:30 PM EDT Jeff Passan picks up the thread Dirk Hayhurst and Jack Morris pulled last week regarding Clay Buchholz‘s start against the Jays and accusations that he was doctoring the ball: Two veteran pitchers and one source close to the Red Sox told Yahoo! Sports that about 90 percent of major league pitchers use some form of spray-on sunscreen – almost always BullFrog brand – that when combined with powdered rosin gives them a far superior grip on the ball … one source close to the Red Sox confirmed the team’s pitchers almost all rely on sunscreen for better grip on finicky balls, particularly in cold, bad weather. It seems almost certain, based on what Passan’s sources are telling him, that yes, Buchholz was applying a foreign substance to the ball last week. But it also seems certain, based on what Passan’s sources are telling him, that almost all pitchers do it and, really, no one cares. Which I think does matter when talk about the nature of all of this. How much it matters I don’t know. If the Blue Jays were willing to look the other way — and they were, probably because their pitchers do the same damn thing — I ’m not sure where the mandate to start inspecting every pitcher’s arm comes from, even if applying Bull Frog to the ball is a violation of a clear rule. Of course, I’ve been trying to tell people for years that, while against the rules, players using PEDs was maybe something more complex than anti-PED gang was willing to admit given its pervasive and open use. Doesn’t make it right. Doesn’t make it legal. But does provide some context with which reasonable people should maybe use in order to filter their outrage and with which to determine just how sharp those pitchforks should be. So: any of those folks willing to take the “I don’t care if everyone is doing it and it’s ‘just part of the game,’ Buchholz is a cheating cheater who cheats” tack here? I’m not gonna hold my breath for it, but please, let me know if you feel that way. ※ 引述《andy880036s (中信魚京云鬼!!)》之銘言: : 道歉囉~ : Jack Morris apologizes to Clay Buchholz : Jack Morris sought out Clay Buchholz, told him he was sorry he took attention : away from him. Said that was not his intent. "We're cool.'' : More Morris: Black Jack said he advised Buch "to have fun with it.'' Said : Jack: As long as we're cool, I don't care what anyone else thinks : http://ppt.cc/zgxW -- In the memory of Roger Keith "Syd" Barrett January 6, 1946 - July 7, 2006 http://0rz.tw/X5eJe I know where Syd Barrett lives -- Television Personalities -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.235.108.165

05/11 17:28, , 1F
Schilling就說他在藍鳥球場都有用
05/11 17:28, 1F

05/11 17:30, , 2F
退休了才說, Perry是巔峰期就承認用口水球了...
05/11 17:30, 2F

05/11 17:31, , 3F
反正官方對口水球本來就是睜一隻眼閉一隻眼...
05/11 17:31, 3F

05/11 17:32, , 4F
怪了,阿如果官方都沒說話,一個莫名其妙的人出來屁兩句
05/11 17:32, 4F

05/11 17:32, , 5F
其他人就跟著起鬨不也很好玩嗎^^
05/11 17:32, 5F

05/11 17:33, , 6F
Kenny Rogers的松焦油, 官方也沒說話, 屁的人可多的是
05/11 17:33, 6F

05/11 17:33, , 7F
還有一大堆人寫書酸或罵的...
05/11 17:33, 7F

05/11 17:36, , 8F
Rivera的口水球事件, 照樣在Baseball prospectus上講
05/11 17:36, 8F

05/11 17:36, , 9F
得挺爽的...
05/11 17:36, 9F

05/11 17:37, , 10F
不用遇到紅襪, 就認為是被針對...
05/11 17:37, 10F

05/11 17:38, , 11F
問一下現在有確定Buchholz右手臂上是什麼?
05/11 17:38, 11F

05/11 17:39, , 12F
不管有沒有...照到在手臂上搓是事實...
05/11 17:39, 12F

05/11 17:39, , 13F
依規定搓需bare hand, 除了rosin bag以外一律不准...
05/11 17:39, 13F

05/11 17:41, , 14F
為什麼你這麼斷定八扣子手臂上一定有滑石粉以外的東西?
05/11 17:41, 14F

05/11 17:43, , 15F
我沒斷定...只是合理的懷疑...就像Rogers的手裡褐色那
05/11 17:43, 15F

05/11 17:43, , 16F
因為手臂上有油亮油亮的阿
05/11 17:43, 16F

05/11 17:43, , 17F
塊...也沒有人知道是什麼? 懷疑可能是松焦油...
05/11 17:43, 17F

05/11 17:45, , 18F
松脂粉
05/11 17:45, 18F

05/11 17:47, , 19F
我相信沒多久以後, Buchholz會被寫到書裡面, 寫的就會
05/11 17:47, 19F

05/11 17:47, , 20F
是塗了防曬油在手臂上...
05/11 17:47, 20F

05/11 17:48, , 21F
其實是綿羊油 大家誤會他了
05/11 17:48, 21F

05/11 17:48, , 22F
所以就是叫 Buchholz 吞下去嘛,反正懷疑一下,大家開心就好
05/11 17:48, 22F

05/11 17:49, , 23F
這篇會有人崩潰
05/11 17:49, 23F

05/11 17:52, , 24F
史上多少口水球事件, 多少人被寫到報導及書上..其實很
05/11 17:52, 24F

05/11 17:52, , 25F
而且照到在手臂搓又怎樣,搓完握球之前都有抹掉怎麼不講
05/11 17:52, 25F

05/11 17:52, , 26F
少有直接證實過, 除了有種的直接承認..甚至巔峰期就承
05/11 17:52, 26F

05/11 17:53, , 27F
認了...
05/11 17:53, 27F

05/11 17:53, , 28F
如果都抹掉, 那幹嘛先搓...
05/11 17:53, 28F

05/11 17:54, , 29F
有用的承認跟 Buchholz 有沒有用是有關聯嗎...
05/11 17:54, 29F

05/11 17:54, , 30F
阿就公堂之上大家假設一下,不用動那麼大火氣對吧^^
05/11 17:54, 30F

05/11 17:55, , 31F
沒錯啊...
05/11 17:55, 31F

05/11 17:56, , 32F
刻球禁是有道理的...塗口水球被禁, 本來就禁得莫名奇
05/11 17:56, 32F

05/11 17:56, , 33F
妙...的確是不衛生啦...
05/11 17:56, 33F

05/11 17:56, , 34F
奇怪,準備動作這種隨個人自由的也有意見,那老爹打擊吐口水
05/11 17:56, 34F

05/11 17:56, , 35F
你是認真回我那句"沒錯嗎"?你真的知道我想表達啥嗎?
05/11 17:56, 35F
還有 147 則推文
還有 1 段內文
05/11 23:44, , 183F
啊都已經擦掉了是要抹什麼啦,抹洨喔,真的很青番耶
05/11 23:44, 183F

05/11 23:46, , 184F
當事主都已經道歉了還在那邊一直辯,有證據就直接拿出來啦
05/11 23:46, 184F

05/11 23:50, , 185F
那如果依照看倌所示, 先把凡士林抹在帽沿...在搓完搓
05/11 23:50, 185F

05/11 23:50, , 186F
褲子投球, 有問題嗎? 那一條寫凡士林不能抹帽沿...
05/11 23:50, 186F

05/11 23:51, , 187F
投球前抹掉了啊? Gaylord Perry似乎就是這麼搞的...
05/11 23:51, 187F

05/11 23:52, , 188F
搓完, 抹掉中指食指外的三指, 去投球...
05/11 23:52, 188F

05/12 00:15, , 189F
Verducci:Most pitchers, not all, use something to
05/12 00:15, 189F

05/12 00:16, , 190F
improve their grip.There are many "homemade recipe
05/12 00:16, 190F

05/12 00:17, , 191F
to go about getting the right kind of tackiness on
05/12 00:17, 191F

05/12 00:18, , 192F
your index and middle fingers to make ball spin
05/12 00:18, 192F

05/12 00:18, , 193F
faster.
05/12 00:18, 193F

05/12 00:28, , 194F
你不要擴大解讀,抹在手上是OK的。如果因為抹東西在手上而
05/12 00:28, 194F

05/12 00:29, , 195F
使球沾黏到異物,那是由裁判來裁定
05/12 00:29, 195F

05/12 00:29, , 196F
奇怪了現在是Jeff Passan丟一個報導出來說...根據紅襪
05/12 00:29, 196F

05/12 00:30, , 197F
隊某人(瞭解球團的人或球員?), 表示紅襪隊都在用防曬
05/12 00:30, 197F

05/12 00:30, , 198F
油...
05/12 00:30, 198F

05/12 00:31, , 199F
然後說全大聯盟90%的投手都在用防曬油...
05/12 00:31, 199F

05/12 00:35, , 200F
這不能再討論下去嗎?
05/12 00:35, 200F

05/12 00:45, , 201F
還不相信, 口水球大師Chesbro的總教練Clare Griffith
05/12 00:45, 201F

05/12 00:46, , 202F
"For a spitball after all, is only a special type
05/12 00:46, 202F

05/12 00:47, , 203F
of fastball. It is pitched with great speed with
05/12 00:47, 203F

05/12 00:48, , 204F
the first two fingers wet. The friction of these
05/12 00:48, 204F

05/12 00:48, , 205F
of these two fingers gives it a peculiar spiral
05/12 00:48, 205F

05/12 00:50, , 206F
motion and this motion coupled with the great
05/12 00:50, 206F

05/12 00:50, , 207F
speed causes it to break sharply."
05/12 00:50, 207F

05/12 00:52, , 208F
這是1904年口述版...手指抹口水握球,提高(降低)摩擦力
05/12 00:52, 208F

05/12 01:03, , 209F
唉 叫Buchy不要塗碧兒泉的啦 改抹曼秀雷敦SPF50+那罐
05/12 01:03, 209F

05/12 01:19, , 210F
forearm的問題不只是Hayhurst在提, bleacher report
05/12 01:19, 210F

05/12 01:19, , 211F
05/12 01:19, 211F

05/12 01:20, , 212F
按規定都是違規, 只是沒有在強制執行而已...
05/12 01:20, 212F

05/12 01:21, , 213F
甚至Morris還提到弄到T-shirt的下半部, 那這又根本在
05/12 01:21, 213F

05/12 01:21, , 214F
禁止之列了...
05/12 01:21, 214F

05/12 03:52, , 215F
講那麼多 規則就是沒有說不行 到底想辯什麼阿?
05/12 03:52, 215F

05/12 06:59, , 216F
又跳針了
05/12 06:59, 216F

05/12 07:00, , 217F
Buchy是有抹到球上嗎 他在褲子擦掉這動作一直被你無視
05/12 07:00, 217F

05/12 08:53, , 218F
今天藍鳥贏了 八扣子沒口水球八局竟然掉兩分 被看破手腳了
05/12 08:53, 218F

05/12 08:53, , 219F
滿意了吧?
05/12 08:53, 219F

05/12 09:31, , 220F
成績證明一切
05/12 09:31, 220F

05/12 14:44, , 221F
break sharply 麻煩去看看八釦子今年跟以前的movement
05/12 14:44, 221F

05/12 15:22, , 222F
藍鳥主播道歉了,你要不要道歉一下
05/12 15:22, 222F
文章代碼(AID): #1HZWwk8e (MLB)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
以下文章回應了本文
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 8 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1HZWwk8e (MLB)