Re: [外電] Buchholz was cheating, but that's okay
推
05/11 10:27,
05/11 10:27
→
05/11 10:28,
05/11 10:28
推
05/11 11:06,
05/11 11:06
既然有人指名要翻譯
這篇也來自HardballTalk
http://0rz.tw/5S1IP
即便就算有90%的投手都在用防曬油加滑石粉, 來增加握球...
也不會證明用防曬油就是可以的, 就是不違法的, 那要不要下次放一罐在投手丘旁
那塗凡士林在手上, 可不可以呢??
所以Hayhurst說的用防曬油不是幾乎要破案了。
但問題依照棒球規則
用異物到球上就是有問題的。
就算90%的投手都用了, 那沒用的10%呢?
Jeff Passan的報導表示: "投手們不認為這是作弊??"
問題是那是用的投手們認為不是在作弊, 但依棒球規則呢??? 用異物就是犯規
如果大家認為用防曬油不是作弊, 要不要請記者問他Buchholz手臂那團亮亮的是什麼,
他要不要公開承認就是防曬油呢?
如果Jeff Passan說的都是對的, 怎麼不敢列名是那些投手在用防曬油呢???
http://0rz.tw/5S1IP
90 percent of pitchers are using spray-on sunscreen, Buchholz-style
Craig Calcaterra May 8, 2013, 3:30 PM EDT
Jeff Passan picks up the thread Dirk Hayhurst and Jack Morris pulled last
week regarding Clay Buchholz‘s start against the Jays and accusations that
he was doctoring the ball:
Two veteran pitchers and one source close to the Red Sox told Yahoo! Sports
that about 90 percent of major league pitchers use some form of spray-on
sunscreen – almost always BullFrog brand – that when combined with powdered
rosin gives them a far superior grip on the ball … one source close to the
Red Sox confirmed the team’s pitchers almost all rely on sunscreen for
better grip on finicky balls, particularly in cold, bad weather.
It seems almost certain, based on what Passan’s sources are telling him,
that yes, Buchholz was applying a foreign substance to the ball last week.
But it also seems certain, based on what Passan’s sources are telling him,
that almost all pitchers do it and, really, no one cares.
Which I think does matter when talk about the nature of all of this. How much
it matters I don’t know. If the Blue Jays were willing to look the other way
— and they were, probably because their pitchers do the same damn thing — I
’m not sure where the mandate to start inspecting every pitcher’s arm comes
from, even if applying Bull Frog to the ball is a violation of a clear rule.
Of course, I’ve been trying to tell people for years that, while against the
rules, players using PEDs was maybe something more complex than anti-PED gang
was willing to admit given its pervasive and open use. Doesn’t make it
right. Doesn’t make it legal. But does provide some context with which
reasonable people should maybe use in order to filter their outrage and with
which to determine just how sharp those pitchforks should be.
So: any of those folks willing to take the “I don’t care if everyone is
doing it and it’s ‘just part of the game,’ Buchholz is a cheating cheater
who cheats” tack here? I’m not gonna hold my breath for it, but please,
let me know if you feel that way.
※ 引述《andy880036s (中信魚京云鬼!!)》之銘言:
: 道歉囉~
: Jack Morris apologizes to Clay Buchholz
: Jack Morris sought out Clay Buchholz, told him he was sorry he took attention
: away from him. Said that was not his intent. "We're cool.''
: More Morris: Black Jack said he advised Buch "to have fun with it.'' Said
: Jack: As long as we're cool, I don't care what anyone else thinks
: http://ppt.cc/zgxW
--
In the memory of Roger Keith "Syd" Barrett
January 6, 1946 - July 7, 2006
http://0rz.tw/X5eJe
I know where Syd Barrett lives -- Television Personalities
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 36.235.108.165
推
05/11 17:28, , 1F
05/11 17:28, 1F
→
05/11 17:30, , 2F
05/11 17:30, 2F
→
05/11 17:31, , 3F
05/11 17:31, 3F
→
05/11 17:32, , 4F
05/11 17:32, 4F
→
05/11 17:32, , 5F
05/11 17:32, 5F
→
05/11 17:33, , 6F
05/11 17:33, 6F
→
05/11 17:33, , 7F
05/11 17:33, 7F
→
05/11 17:36, , 8F
05/11 17:36, 8F
→
05/11 17:36, , 9F
05/11 17:36, 9F
→
05/11 17:37, , 10F
05/11 17:37, 10F
推
05/11 17:38, , 11F
05/11 17:38, 11F
→
05/11 17:39, , 12F
05/11 17:39, 12F
→
05/11 17:39, , 13F
05/11 17:39, 13F
推
05/11 17:41, , 14F
05/11 17:41, 14F
→
05/11 17:43, , 15F
05/11 17:43, 15F
推
05/11 17:43, , 16F
05/11 17:43, 16F
→
05/11 17:43, , 17F
05/11 17:43, 17F
推
05/11 17:45, , 18F
05/11 17:45, 18F
→
05/11 17:47, , 19F
05/11 17:47, 19F
→
05/11 17:47, , 20F
05/11 17:47, 20F
→
05/11 17:48, , 21F
05/11 17:48, 21F
推
05/11 17:48, , 22F
05/11 17:48, 22F
推
05/11 17:49, , 23F
05/11 17:49, 23F
→
05/11 17:52, , 24F
05/11 17:52, 24F
推
05/11 17:52, , 25F
05/11 17:52, 25F
→
05/11 17:52, , 26F
05/11 17:52, 26F
→
05/11 17:53, , 27F
05/11 17:53, 27F
→
05/11 17:53, , 28F
05/11 17:53, 28F
推
05/11 17:54, , 29F
05/11 17:54, 29F
推
05/11 17:54, , 30F
05/11 17:54, 30F
→
05/11 17:55, , 31F
05/11 17:55, 31F
→
05/11 17:56, , 32F
05/11 17:56, 32F
→
05/11 17:56, , 33F
05/11 17:56, 33F
→
05/11 17:56, , 34F
05/11 17:56, 34F
→
05/11 17:56, , 35F
05/11 17:56, 35F
還有 147 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
05/11 23:44, , 183F
05/11 23:44, 183F
→
05/11 23:46, , 184F
05/11 23:46, 184F
→
05/11 23:50, , 185F
05/11 23:50, 185F
→
05/11 23:50, , 186F
05/11 23:50, 186F
→
05/11 23:51, , 187F
05/11 23:51, 187F
→
05/11 23:52, , 188F
05/11 23:52, 188F
→
05/12 00:15, , 189F
05/12 00:15, 189F
→
05/12 00:16, , 190F
05/12 00:16, 190F
→
05/12 00:17, , 191F
05/12 00:17, 191F
→
05/12 00:18, , 192F
05/12 00:18, 192F
→
05/12 00:18, , 193F
05/12 00:18, 193F
推
05/12 00:28, , 194F
05/12 00:28, 194F
→
05/12 00:29, , 195F
05/12 00:29, 195F
→
05/12 00:29, , 196F
05/12 00:29, 196F
→
05/12 00:30, , 197F
05/12 00:30, 197F
→
05/12 00:30, , 198F
05/12 00:30, 198F
→
05/12 00:31, , 199F
05/12 00:31, 199F
→
05/12 00:35, , 200F
05/12 00:35, 200F
→
05/12 00:45, , 201F
05/12 00:45, 201F
→
05/12 00:46, , 202F
05/12 00:46, 202F
→
05/12 00:47, , 203F
05/12 00:47, 203F
→
05/12 00:48, , 204F
05/12 00:48, 204F
→
05/12 00:48, , 205F
05/12 00:48, 205F
→
05/12 00:50, , 206F
05/12 00:50, 206F
→
05/12 00:50, , 207F
05/12 00:50, 207F
→
05/12 00:52, , 208F
05/12 00:52, 208F
→
05/12 01:03, , 209F
05/12 01:03, 209F
→
05/12 01:19, , 210F
05/12 01:19, 210F
→
05/12 01:19, , 211F
05/12 01:19, 211F
→
05/12 01:20, , 212F
05/12 01:20, 212F
→
05/12 01:21, , 213F
05/12 01:21, 213F
→
05/12 01:21, , 214F
05/12 01:21, 214F
噓
05/12 03:52, , 215F
05/12 03:52, 215F
噓
05/12 06:59, , 216F
05/12 06:59, 216F
→
05/12 07:00, , 217F
05/12 07:00, 217F
噓
05/12 08:53, , 218F
05/12 08:53, 218F
→
05/12 08:53, , 219F
05/12 08:53, 219F
噓
05/12 09:31, , 220F
05/12 09:31, 220F
噓
05/12 14:44, , 221F
05/12 14:44, 221F
噓
05/12 15:22, , 222F
05/12 15:22, 222F
討論串 (同標題文章)