Re: [閒聊] 叉燒到底有什麼成績或代表作?
我發現好像很多人把事情攪在一起講,我談一下我的看法。
叉燒有沒有成績或代表作?當然是有。閃電狼的崛起當然是閃電狼每個人的功勞,如果閃電
狼有一個人在混吃等死,就算只有一個我不覺得閃電狼S5前半季跟S6可以這麼風光。
但是叉燒有沒有可議論之處?當然是有。B/P這種東西本來就是公說公有理婆說婆有理,鄉
民不是絕對正確,當然叉燒也不是。以目前叉燒在B/P上最多爭議的BAN雷茲來講,雖然克
萊門說過扣馬也不會BAN雷茲,但事實上後來扣馬就是BAN了。不論鄉民到底看不看得懂比
賽,既然扣馬有BAN就代表這一BAN是有討論價值的,但叉燒就兩三句鎖死討論的空間,這
才是叉燒最大的敗筆。
不過說實話,叉燒能靠自己那張嘴成為分析師界的西維拉,我個人除了敬佩還是敬佩,這
洗文之多之速不下西門,看大家多愛叉燒啊,嘻嘻。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.127.225
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1494204507.A.13A.html
→
05/08 08:54, , 1F
05/08 08:54, 1F
→
05/08 08:55, , 2F
05/08 08:55, 2F
→
05/08 08:59, , 3F
05/08 08:59, 3F
照你這說法非當事人 B/P不能講 操作不能講 換將不能講 討論版都收一收好了
→
05/08 09:00, , 4F
05/08 09:00, 4F
→
05/08 09:02, , 5F
05/08 09:02, 5F
推
05/08 09:02, , 6F
05/08 09:02, 6F
→
05/08 09:03, , 7F
05/08 09:03, 7F
講真的除少部分沒有人一開始就要戰叉燒 而是質疑B/P 叉燒自己用嘴放火 怪到別人喔
→
05/08 09:03, , 8F
05/08 09:03, 8F
※ 編輯: RoMaybe (1.165.127.225), 05/08/2017 09:04:55
→
05/08 09:03, , 9F
05/08 09:03, 9F
→
05/08 09:03, , 10F
05/08 09:03, 10F
推
05/08 09:04, , 11F
05/08 09:04, 11F
→
05/08 09:04, , 12F
05/08 09:04, 12F
→
05/08 09:06, , 13F
05/08 09:06, 13F
→
05/08 09:06, , 14F
05/08 09:06, 14F
→
05/08 09:07, , 15F
05/08 09:07, 15F
→
05/08 09:07, , 16F
05/08 09:07, 16F
→
05/08 09:08, , 17F
05/08 09:08, 17F
→
05/08 09:08, , 18F
05/08 09:08, 18F
→
05/08 09:09, , 19F
05/08 09:09, 19F
→
05/08 09:10, , 20F
05/08 09:10, 20F
→
05/08 09:10, , 21F
05/08 09:10, 21F
推
05/08 09:11, , 22F
05/08 09:11, 22F
→
05/08 09:11, , 23F
05/08 09:11, 23F
→
05/08 09:12, , 24F
05/08 09:12, 24F
→
05/08 09:12, , 25F
05/08 09:12, 25F
→
05/08 09:12, , 26F
05/08 09:12, 26F
→
05/08 09:13, , 27F
05/08 09:13, 27F
→
05/08 09:13, , 28F
05/08 09:13, 28F
推
05/08 09:13, , 29F
05/08 09:13, 29F
→
05/08 09:13, , 30F
05/08 09:13, 30F
→
05/08 09:13, , 31F
05/08 09:13, 31F
→
05/08 09:14, , 32F
05/08 09:14, 32F
→
05/08 09:15, , 33F
05/08 09:15, 33F
→
05/08 09:15, , 34F
05/08 09:15, 34F
→
05/08 09:16, , 35F
05/08 09:16, 35F
→
05/08 09:16, , 36F
05/08 09:16, 36F
還有 151 則推文
推
05/08 10:04, , 188F
05/08 10:04, 188F
→
05/08 10:04, , 189F
05/08 10:04, 189F
→
05/08 10:04, , 190F
05/08 10:04, 190F
推
05/08 10:05, , 191F
05/08 10:05, 191F
推
05/08 10:06, , 192F
05/08 10:06, 192F
→
05/08 10:06, , 193F
05/08 10:06, 193F
→
05/08 10:06, , 194F
05/08 10:06, 194F
→
05/08 10:06, , 195F
05/08 10:06, 195F
→
05/08 10:06, , 196F
05/08 10:06, 196F
→
05/08 10:07, , 197F
05/08 10:07, 197F
→
05/08 10:09, , 198F
05/08 10:09, 198F
推
05/08 10:09, , 199F
05/08 10:09, 199F
→
05/08 10:16, , 200F
05/08 10:16, 200F
→
05/08 10:19, , 201F
05/08 10:19, 201F
推
05/08 10:21, , 202F
05/08 10:21, 202F
推
05/08 10:22, , 203F
05/08 10:22, 203F
→
05/08 10:22, , 204F
05/08 10:22, 204F
→
05/08 10:23, , 205F
05/08 10:23, 205F
推
05/08 10:26, , 206F
05/08 10:26, 206F
推
05/08 10:26, , 207F
05/08 10:26, 207F
→
05/08 10:33, , 208F
05/08 10:33, 208F
→
05/08 10:34, , 209F
05/08 10:34, 209F
推
05/08 10:59, , 210F
05/08 10:59, 210F
推
05/08 10:59, , 211F
05/08 10:59, 211F
推
05/08 11:05, , 212F
05/08 11:05, 212F
→
05/08 11:05, , 213F
05/08 11:05, 213F
→
05/08 11:05, , 214F
05/08 11:05, 214F
→
05/08 11:05, , 215F
05/08 11:05, 215F
推
05/08 11:07, , 216F
05/08 11:07, 216F
推
05/08 11:08, , 217F
05/08 11:08, 217F
→
05/08 11:08, , 218F
05/08 11:08, 218F
→
05/08 11:09, , 219F
05/08 11:09, 219F
→
05/08 11:09, , 220F
05/08 11:09, 220F
→
05/08 11:11, , 221F
05/08 11:11, 221F
推
05/08 12:27, , 222F
05/08 12:27, 222F
推
05/08 12:39, , 223F
05/08 12:39, 223F
推
05/08 14:12, , 224F
05/08 14:12, 224F
推
05/08 14:40, , 225F
05/08 14:40, 225F
噓
05/08 15:15, , 226F
05/08 15:15, 226F
推
05/08 18:02, , 227F
05/08 18:02, 227F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 12 篇):