[問題] 歐洲人是不是比較有創造力?
我會問這個問題
正是受到EU季後賽上路阿卡莉的刺激
我沒想過這輩子還能看到阿卡莉這樣的角色出現在職業比賽上面,而且還是季後賽
EU一向就是以新奇玩法以及不按牌理出牌聞名的賽區,
如之前UOL的逆命JG、超級外卡ANX、開創META的傳說M5
而另一方面,歐洲戰隊卻又是以營運為強項,也很難與這種出奇招的印象搭在一起
現在各國電競給我的感覺就是,亞洲是很典型的乖乖牌模範生
韓國學習能力最高也下最多功夫去研究正確、合理的打法,所以永遠保持在第一名
剩下中國、台灣賽區就是整天想著怎麼學韓國人,學著怎麼打「正確解答」的比賽
至於歐美,特別是歐洲,就是那種不愛照課本念書但你又知道他頭腦很好的人
他們會學習韓式主流打法,但不代表比賽永遠就是那一套
雖然打韓國還是會被絕對實力壓過去,但是已經是很令人讚嘆的創新
是不是歐洲人的思想開放、普遍來說真的比亞洲人還要有創造力呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.174.145.189
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1490580764.A.830.html
推
03/27 10:13, , 1F
03/27 10:13, 1F
推
03/27 10:14, , 2F
03/27 10:14, 2F
推
03/27 10:17, , 3F
03/27 10:17, 3F
推
03/27 10:17, , 4F
03/27 10:17, 4F
推
03/27 10:17, , 5F
03/27 10:17, 5F
噓
03/27 10:18, , 6F
03/27 10:18, 6F
推
03/27 10:18, , 7F
03/27 10:18, 7F
推
03/27 10:18, , 8F
03/27 10:18, 8F
→
03/27 10:20, , 9F
03/27 10:20, 9F
推
03/27 10:21, , 10F
03/27 10:21, 10F
推
03/27 10:21, , 11F
03/27 10:21, 11F
噓
03/27 10:21, , 12F
03/27 10:21, 12F
→
03/27 10:22, , 13F
03/27 10:22, 13F
推
03/27 10:23, , 14F
03/27 10:23, 14F
噓
03/27 10:25, , 15F
03/27 10:25, 15F
推
03/27 10:28, , 16F
03/27 10:28, 16F
推
03/27 10:28, , 17F
03/27 10:28, 17F
噓
03/27 10:28, , 18F
03/27 10:28, 18F
噓
03/27 10:28, , 19F
03/27 10:28, 19F
→
03/27 10:29, , 20F
03/27 10:29, 20F
→
03/27 10:29, , 21F
03/27 10:29, 21F
噓
03/27 10:32, , 22F
03/27 10:32, 22F
噓
03/27 10:33, , 23F
03/27 10:33, 23F
→
03/27 10:34, , 24F
03/27 10:34, 24F
推
03/27 10:38, , 25F
03/27 10:38, 25F
→
03/27 10:38, , 26F
03/27 10:38, 26F
推
03/27 10:39, , 27F
03/27 10:39, 27F
→
03/27 10:40, , 28F
03/27 10:40, 28F
推
03/27 10:40, , 29F
03/27 10:40, 29F
噓
03/27 10:40, , 30F
03/27 10:40, 30F
→
03/27 10:40, , 31F
03/27 10:40, 31F
→
03/27 10:40, , 32F
03/27 10:40, 32F
推
03/27 10:40, , 33F
03/27 10:40, 33F
噓
03/27 10:40, , 34F
03/27 10:40, 34F
→
03/27 10:41, , 35F
03/27 10:41, 35F
→
03/27 10:50, , 36F
03/27 10:50, 36F
→
03/27 10:56, , 37F
03/27 10:56, 37F
→
03/27 11:15, , 38F
03/27 11:15, 38F
推
03/27 11:16, , 39F
03/27 11:16, 39F
推
03/27 11:23, , 40F
03/27 11:23, 40F
噓
03/27 11:26, , 41F
03/27 11:26, 41F
→
03/27 11:26, , 42F
03/27 11:26, 42F
推
03/27 11:32, , 43F
03/27 11:32, 43F
→
03/27 11:33, , 44F
03/27 11:33, 44F
推
03/27 11:34, , 45F
03/27 11:34, 45F
推
03/27 11:46, , 46F
03/27 11:46, 46F
→
03/27 11:46, , 47F
03/27 11:46, 47F
推
03/27 11:46, , 48F
03/27 11:46, 48F
→
03/27 11:47, , 49F
03/27 11:47, 49F
→
03/27 11:48, , 50F
03/27 11:48, 50F
→
03/27 11:49, , 51F
03/27 11:49, 51F
→
03/27 11:49, , 52F
03/27 11:49, 52F
→
03/27 11:50, , 53F
03/27 11:50, 53F
噓
03/27 11:50, , 54F
03/27 11:50, 54F
→
03/27 11:51, , 55F
03/27 11:51, 55F
→
03/27 11:52, , 56F
03/27 11:52, 56F
→
03/27 11:52, , 57F
03/27 11:52, 57F
→
03/27 11:53, , 58F
03/27 11:53, 58F
→
03/27 11:53, , 59F
03/27 11:53, 59F
推
03/27 11:55, , 60F
03/27 11:55, 60F
噓
03/27 12:11, , 61F
03/27 12:11, 61F
→
03/27 12:20, , 62F
03/27 12:20, 62F
→
03/27 12:27, , 63F
03/27 12:27, 63F
→
03/27 12:27, , 64F
03/27 12:27, 64F
噓
03/27 12:34, , 65F
03/27 12:34, 65F
→
03/27 12:38, , 66F
03/27 12:38, 66F
→
03/27 12:38, , 67F
03/27 12:38, 67F
推
03/27 12:38, , 68F
03/27 12:38, 68F
→
03/27 12:59, , 69F
03/27 12:59, 69F
推
03/27 13:02, , 70F
03/27 13:02, 70F
推
03/27 13:22, , 71F
03/27 13:22, 71F
推
03/27 14:10, , 72F
03/27 14:10, 72F
噓
03/27 14:51, , 73F
03/27 14:51, 73F
推
03/27 15:39, , 74F
03/27 15:39, 74F
推
03/28 10:18, , 75F
03/28 10:18, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)