[閒聊] LPL和LMS賽區合併會不會比較好
這次的結果差不多出來了
至少前三名有兩隊韓國隊
反之 我們16強*2
中國 16*1 8*2
Lms 常被詬病 賽區內整體實力競爭性不足
LPL 則是足 但就是專門打國內賽
如果就實際面來看
兩個賽區合併 會不會有更大的進步空間
除了強度調整
對台灣電競環境會不會也能有所提升
大家覺得呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.216.243.83
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1476589983.A.8A8.html
推
10/16 11:53, , 1F
10/16 11:53, 1F
推
10/16 11:53, , 2F
10/16 11:53, 2F
推
10/16 11:54, , 3F
10/16 11:54, 3F
推
10/16 11:54, , 4F
10/16 11:54, 4F
噓
10/16 11:55, , 5F
10/16 11:55, 5F
推
10/16 11:56, , 6F
10/16 11:56, 6F
噓
10/16 11:56, , 7F
10/16 11:56, 7F
→
10/16 11:56, , 8F
10/16 11:56, 8F
推
10/16 11:58, , 9F
10/16 11:58, 9F
推
10/16 11:58, , 10F
10/16 11:58, 10F
推
10/16 11:58, , 11F
10/16 11:58, 11F
推
10/16 11:58, , 12F
10/16 11:58, 12F
推
10/16 11:59, , 13F
10/16 11:59, 13F
推
10/16 11:59, , 14F
10/16 11:59, 14F
推
10/16 11:59, , 15F
10/16 11:59, 15F
噓
10/16 11:59, , 16F
10/16 11:59, 16F
→
10/16 12:00, , 17F
10/16 12:00, 17F
我覺得LMS 這幾年的關鍵 真的在隊伍競爭上強度不足
前幾名永遠是這些 在這樣環境下 我們的表現就是到這裡了
或許常常會說 阿 國際賽怎樣失智
但如果平常競爭強度維持在一個水準 選手表現的安定性也會趨向穩定
而不是 又小安 又不會END GAME了 這種讓人無奈的答案
※ 編輯: One102bird (114.47.65.251), 10/16/2016 12:02:07
→
10/16 12:01, , 18F
10/16 12:01, 18F
噓
10/16 12:02, , 19F
10/16 12:02, 19F
推
10/16 12:08, , 20F
10/16 12:08, 20F
推
10/16 12:08, , 21F
10/16 12:08, 21F
噓
10/16 12:08, , 22F
10/16 12:08, 22F
推
10/16 12:09, , 23F
10/16 12:09, 23F
→
10/16 12:10, , 24F
10/16 12:10, 24F
→
10/16 12:11, , 25F
10/16 12:11, 25F
台港澳同國嗎?
※ 編輯: One102bird (114.47.65.251), 10/16/2016 12:12:35
推
10/16 12:12, , 26F
10/16 12:12, 26F
→
10/16 12:12, , 27F
10/16 12:12, 27F
噓
10/16 12:12, , 28F
10/16 12:12, 28F
→
10/16 12:12, , 29F
10/16 12:12, 29F
→
10/16 12:13, , 30F
10/16 12:13, 30F
→
10/16 12:14, , 31F
10/16 12:14, 31F
噓
10/16 12:14, , 32F
10/16 12:14, 32F
→
10/16 12:15, , 33F
10/16 12:15, 33F
推
10/16 12:18, , 34F
10/16 12:18, 34F
推
10/16 12:19, , 35F
10/16 12:19, 35F
→
10/16 12:20, , 36F
10/16 12:20, 36F
噓
10/16 12:21, , 37F
10/16 12:21, 37F
→
10/16 12:21, , 38F
10/16 12:21, 38F
噓
10/16 12:21, , 39F
10/16 12:21, 39F
推
10/16 12:25, , 40F
10/16 12:25, 40F
推
10/16 12:28, , 41F
10/16 12:28, 41F
→
10/16 12:29, , 42F
10/16 12:29, 42F
噓
10/16 12:31, , 43F
10/16 12:31, 43F
噓
10/16 12:31, , 44F
10/16 12:31, 44F
推
10/16 12:31, , 45F
10/16 12:31, 45F
推
10/16 12:32, , 46F
10/16 12:32, 46F
噓
10/16 12:34, , 47F
10/16 12:34, 47F
→
10/16 12:35, , 48F
10/16 12:35, 48F
→
10/16 12:35, , 49F
10/16 12:35, 49F
→
10/16 12:35, , 50F
10/16 12:35, 50F
→
10/16 12:37, , 51F
10/16 12:37, 51F
→
10/16 12:37, , 52F
10/16 12:37, 52F
→
10/16 12:38, , 53F
10/16 12:38, 53F
→
10/16 12:41, , 54F
10/16 12:41, 54F
噓
10/16 12:46, , 55F
10/16 12:46, 55F
→
10/16 12:46, , 56F
10/16 12:46, 56F
推
10/16 12:47, , 57F
10/16 12:47, 57F
→
10/16 12:48, , 58F
10/16 12:48, 58F
推
10/16 12:49, , 59F
10/16 12:49, 59F
噓
10/16 12:50, , 60F
10/16 12:50, 60F
推
10/16 12:51, , 61F
10/16 12:51, 61F
噓
10/16 12:52, , 62F
10/16 12:52, 62F
推
10/16 12:52, , 63F
10/16 12:52, 63F
噓
10/16 12:53, , 64F
10/16 12:53, 64F
噓
10/16 13:01, , 65F
10/16 13:01, 65F
噓
10/16 13:16, , 66F
10/16 13:16, 66F
→
10/16 13:19, , 67F
10/16 13:19, 67F
→
10/16 13:19, , 68F
10/16 13:19, 68F
噓
10/16 13:32, , 69F
10/16 13:32, 69F
噓
10/16 13:38, , 70F
10/16 13:38, 70F
推
10/16 13:57, , 71F
10/16 13:57, 71F
→
10/16 13:58, , 72F
10/16 13:58, 72F
推
10/16 14:34, , 73F
10/16 14:34, 73F
噓
10/16 15:09, , 74F
10/16 15:09, 74F
→
10/16 15:10, , 75F
10/16 15:10, 75F
推
10/16 15:37, , 76F
10/16 15:37, 76F
推
10/16 16:00, , 77F
10/16 16:00, 77F
推
10/16 16:50, , 78F
10/16 16:50, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):