Re: [閒聊] 西門跟Chawy這樣真的算良性競爭嗎
說來說去還不就那些:
大將被騙進來了,西門沒退
大將夏天被冰整季,沒有上場
投票制,分數制 欸怎都西門上
AHQ以西門體系戰術,大將沒發揮
配合不如西門,大將新進難免要魔盒
西門擴充角色池,大將影響式微
然後替大抱不平的發文
大概就是西黑,大將粉,和非起Q粉
到現在為止,還沒看到一個說
“派大將上去就能贏”
為什麼?因為大家對大將的實力印象
也只停留在春季賽時的紫方
當時也沒有特別亮眼
而現在西門就那麼強了,實力擺在那邊
說實在的,也根本不需要換
「幹不會吧,我大將快沒上場機會了」
「馬的,起Q到底簽來幹嘛的」
「西門穩定輸線…咦?隨便啦快換掉」
“要是當初大將留在TPA就好了”
也沒看到 沒什麼人提
因為FoFo確實強
然後他們也沒出國,換大將打可能更糟
心知肚明
無可奈何之下,只好去挖掘過往
「大將被騙兩次,真不值得」
「怎不讓大將上場試試看?」
拜託,說的我還以為起Q沒出國勒
就因為他沒上場?
出國資格不是他打出來的?
起Q沒給他資源不然先發就是他?
起Q給大將攝記錄片,還帶他出國替補
好像都是應該的?
說實在的我不知道帶他替補有什麼作用
還不如換貝貝
對起Q來說,要贏
對起Q粉來說,誰上都好,要能贏
對抱不平的來說,要大將上場
你們只是要他上場而已,無關勝負
他要是真的能贏起Q還會放著他板凳?
最好笑的是起Q先把大將簽過來
TPA就戰力大減少個對手這類幽默笑話
他能贏還會離開TPA?
LMS的觀眾才是最有人情味的
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony ST25i.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.46.19.243
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1474277123.A.FF6.html
推
09/19 17:27, , 1F
09/19 17:27, 1F
噓
09/19 17:28, , 2F
09/19 17:28, 2F
推
09/19 17:29, , 3F
09/19 17:29, 3F
推
09/19 17:29, , 4F
09/19 17:29, 4F
推
09/19 17:30, , 5F
09/19 17:30, 5F
→
09/19 17:30, , 6F
09/19 17:30, 6F
→
09/19 17:30, , 7F
09/19 17:30, 7F
推
09/19 17:31, , 8F
09/19 17:31, 8F
→
09/19 17:32, , 9F
09/19 17:32, 9F
→
09/19 17:32, , 10F
09/19 17:32, 10F
→
09/19 17:32, , 11F
09/19 17:32, 11F
→
09/19 17:33, , 12F
09/19 17:33, 12F
→
09/19 17:35, , 13F
09/19 17:35, 13F
推
09/19 17:36, , 14F
09/19 17:36, 14F
推
09/19 17:37, , 15F
09/19 17:37, 15F
推
09/19 17:37, , 16F
09/19 17:37, 16F
噓
09/19 17:37, , 17F
09/19 17:37, 17F
→
09/19 17:39, , 18F
09/19 17:39, 18F
→
09/19 17:39, , 19F
09/19 17:39, 19F
→
09/19 17:39, , 20F
09/19 17:39, 20F
→
09/19 17:40, , 21F
09/19 17:40, 21F
→
09/19 17:40, , 22F
09/19 17:40, 22F
→
09/19 17:41, , 23F
09/19 17:41, 23F
→
09/19 17:41, , 24F
09/19 17:41, 24F
推
09/19 17:42, , 25F
09/19 17:42, 25F
噓
09/19 17:42, , 26F
09/19 17:42, 26F
推
09/19 17:42, , 27F
09/19 17:42, 27F
→
09/19 17:42, , 28F
09/19 17:42, 28F
噓
09/19 17:42, , 29F
09/19 17:42, 29F
→
09/19 17:43, , 30F
09/19 17:43, 30F
→
09/19 17:43, , 31F
09/19 17:43, 31F
噓
09/19 17:43, , 32F
09/19 17:43, 32F
→
09/19 17:43, , 33F
09/19 17:43, 33F
推
09/19 17:44, , 34F
09/19 17:44, 34F
→
09/19 17:44, , 35F
09/19 17:44, 35F
→
09/19 17:44, , 36F
09/19 17:44, 36F
→
09/19 17:44, , 37F
09/19 17:44, 37F
→
09/19 17:44, , 38F
09/19 17:44, 38F
推
09/19 17:45, , 39F
09/19 17:45, 39F
還有 184 則推文
推
09/19 19:25, , 224F
09/19 19:25, 224F
→
09/19 19:27, , 225F
09/19 19:27, 225F
→
09/19 19:27, , 226F
09/19 19:27, 226F
→
09/19 19:27, , 227F
09/19 19:27, 227F
→
09/19 19:30, , 228F
09/19 19:30, 228F
→
09/19 19:32, , 229F
09/19 19:32, 229F
推
09/19 19:32, , 230F
09/19 19:32, 230F
→
09/19 19:33, , 231F
09/19 19:33, 231F
→
09/19 19:33, , 232F
09/19 19:33, 232F
→
09/19 19:34, , 233F
09/19 19:34, 233F
→
09/19 19:34, , 234F
09/19 19:34, 234F
→
09/19 19:35, , 235F
09/19 19:35, 235F
噓
09/19 19:35, , 236F
09/19 19:35, 236F
推
09/19 19:35, , 237F
09/19 19:35, 237F
推
09/19 19:37, , 238F
09/19 19:37, 238F
推
09/19 19:46, , 239F
09/19 19:46, 239F
→
09/19 19:47, , 240F
09/19 19:47, 240F
推
09/19 20:00, , 241F
09/19 20:00, 241F
→
09/19 20:01, , 242F
09/19 20:01, 242F
噓
09/19 20:13, , 243F
09/19 20:13, 243F
推
09/19 20:14, , 244F
09/19 20:14, 244F
→
09/19 20:15, , 245F
09/19 20:15, 245F
噓
09/19 20:18, , 246F
09/19 20:18, 246F
推
09/19 20:27, , 247F
09/19 20:27, 247F
→
09/19 20:37, , 248F
09/19 20:37, 248F
→
09/19 20:37, , 249F
09/19 20:37, 249F
噓
09/19 20:59, , 250F
09/19 20:59, 250F
推
09/19 21:04, , 251F
09/19 21:04, 251F
推
09/19 21:18, , 252F
09/19 21:18, 252F
推
09/19 21:29, , 253F
09/19 21:29, 253F
推
09/19 22:37, , 254F
09/19 22:37, 254F
→
09/19 22:38, , 255F
09/19 22:38, 255F
噓
09/20 00:02, , 256F
09/20 00:02, 256F
推
09/20 00:03, , 257F
09/20 00:03, 257F
噓
09/20 01:44, , 258F
09/20 01:44, 258F
→
09/20 01:45, , 259F
09/20 01:45, 259F
推
09/20 09:34, , 260F
09/20 09:34, 260F
→
09/20 09:34, , 261F
09/20 09:34, 261F
→
09/20 09:34, , 262F
09/20 09:34, 262F
推
09/20 13:45, , 263F
09/20 13:45, 263F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 6 篇):
閒聊
-18
134