[問題] 攻擊/施法距離要怎麼去量化?
像是艾希射程600,我們就說比一般的AD手還長
汎的射程550,有人就說給他多50就會很可怕
葛雷夫手長525,大家就說他手短
凱特琳手長650,所以可以點爆你
開大的老鼠有850射程,所以可以無損點塔(誤)
我們該怎麼去理解這種射程帶來的優勢呢?
是線性地去看,600是550的1.091倍,然後650是550的1.182倍
還是說要從「能攻擊的範圍」來衡量呢,也就是說
600^2 是 550^2 的 1.19倍,650^2是600^2的1.17倍 才比較正確呢?
還是說無關數值多寡,這只是比較大小的概念
也就是說650>600 600>550
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.217.14
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1445980843.A.CEF.html
噓
10/28 05:24, , 1F
10/28 05:24, 1F
推
10/28 05:28, , 2F
10/28 05:28, 2F
→
10/28 05:29, , 3F
10/28 05:29, 3F
→
10/28 05:30, , 4F
10/28 05:30, 4F
推
10/28 05:31, , 5F
10/28 05:31, 5F
→
10/28 05:31, , 6F
10/28 05:31, 6F
推
10/28 05:32, , 7F
10/28 05:32, 7F
推
10/28 05:57, , 8F
10/28 05:57, 8F
→
10/28 05:57, , 9F
10/28 05:57, 9F
→
10/28 05:59, , 10F
10/28 05:59, 10F
→
10/28 05:59, , 11F
10/28 05:59, 11F
→
10/28 06:01, , 12F
10/28 06:01, 12F
推
10/28 06:01, , 13F
10/28 06:01, 13F
推
10/28 06:02, , 14F
10/28 06:02, 14F
→
10/28 06:05, , 15F
10/28 06:05, 15F
→
10/28 06:05, , 16F
10/28 06:05, 16F
→
10/28 06:06, , 17F
10/28 06:06, 17F
→
10/28 06:08, , 18F
10/28 06:08, 18F
推
10/28 06:09, , 19F
10/28 06:09, 19F
推
10/28 06:13, , 20F
10/28 06:13, 20F
推
10/28 06:26, , 21F
10/28 06:26, 21F
→
10/28 06:27, , 22F
10/28 06:27, 22F
推
10/28 06:27, , 23F
10/28 06:27, 23F
→
10/28 06:28, , 24F
10/28 06:28, 24F
→
10/28 06:28, , 25F
10/28 06:28, 25F
→
10/28 06:29, , 26F
10/28 06:29, 26F
→
10/28 06:29, , 27F
10/28 06:29, 27F
→
10/28 06:30, , 28F
10/28 06:30, 28F
推
10/28 06:40, , 29F
10/28 06:40, 29F
→
10/28 06:41, , 30F
10/28 06:41, 30F
→
10/28 06:43, , 31F
10/28 06:43, 31F
→
10/28 06:44, , 32F
10/28 06:44, 32F
→
10/28 06:45, , 33F
10/28 06:45, 33F
→
10/28 06:46, , 34F
10/28 06:46, 34F
→
10/28 06:48, , 35F
10/28 06:48, 35F
推
10/28 06:53, , 36F
10/28 06:53, 36F
推
10/28 07:04, , 37F
10/28 07:04, 37F
→
10/28 07:04, , 38F
10/28 07:04, 38F
→
10/28 07:05, , 39F
10/28 07:05, 39F
→
10/28 07:06, , 40F
10/28 07:06, 40F
→
10/28 07:06, , 41F
10/28 07:06, 41F
→
10/28 07:08, , 42F
10/28 07:08, 42F
→
10/28 07:08, , 43F
10/28 07:08, 43F
→
10/28 07:09, , 44F
10/28 07:09, 44F
→
10/28 07:10, , 45F
10/28 07:10, 45F
→
10/28 07:15, , 46F
10/28 07:15, 46F
推
10/28 07:22, , 47F
10/28 07:22, 47F
推
10/28 07:23, , 48F
10/28 07:23, 48F
推
10/28 08:14, , 49F
10/28 08:14, 49F
推
10/28 08:17, , 50F
10/28 08:17, 50F
推
10/28 08:24, , 51F
10/28 08:24, 51F
→
10/28 08:38, , 52F
10/28 08:38, 52F
推
10/28 08:40, , 53F
10/28 08:40, 53F
推
10/28 08:41, , 54F
10/28 08:41, 54F
噓
10/28 08:46, , 55F
10/28 08:46, 55F
→
10/28 08:46, , 56F
10/28 08:46, 56F
推
10/28 08:51, , 57F
10/28 08:51, 57F
推
10/28 08:51, , 58F
10/28 08:51, 58F
推
10/28 09:28, , 59F
10/28 09:28, 59F
噓
10/28 09:33, , 60F
10/28 09:33, 60F
噓
10/28 09:35, , 61F
10/28 09:35, 61F
→
10/28 09:35, , 62F
10/28 09:35, 62F
→
10/28 09:35, , 63F
10/28 09:35, 63F
→
10/28 09:49, , 64F
10/28 09:49, 64F
→
10/28 10:07, , 65F
10/28 10:07, 65F
→
10/28 10:07, , 66F
10/28 10:07, 66F
噓
10/28 10:07, , 67F
10/28 10:07, 67F
→
10/28 10:11, , 68F
10/28 10:11, 68F
噓
10/28 10:15, , 69F
10/28 10:15, 69F
→
10/28 10:15, , 70F
10/28 10:15, 70F
→
10/28 10:15, , 71F
10/28 10:15, 71F
→
10/28 10:22, , 72F
10/28 10:22, 72F
推
10/28 10:31, , 73F
10/28 10:31, 73F
推
10/28 10:33, , 74F
10/28 10:33, 74F
→
10/28 10:33, , 75F
10/28 10:33, 75F
推
10/28 10:37, , 76F
10/28 10:37, 76F
噓
10/28 10:40, , 77F
10/28 10:40, 77F
推
10/28 10:44, , 78F
10/28 10:44, 78F
噓
10/28 10:50, , 79F
10/28 10:50, 79F
噓
10/28 11:37, , 80F
10/28 11:37, 80F
→
10/28 11:39, , 81F
10/28 11:39, 81F
推
10/28 11:55, , 82F
10/28 11:55, 82F
推
10/28 18:36, , 83F
10/28 18:36, 83F
推
10/29 00:58, , 84F
10/29 00:58, 84F
推
10/29 02:13, , 85F
10/29 02:13, 85F
討論串 (同標題文章)