[閒聊] 認真問一下要是所有AHQ對手都這樣BAN?
今天被這樣BAN有點被看破手腳的感覺
全世界現在都知道
AD的不穩定性要靠貪肯奇
王爺的角色池問題
上面說的都真的發生在這場比賽
認真問一下接下來對手都這樣BAN
王爺到底會拿什麼角色出來解?
黛安娜/科佳斯?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.183.81.10
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1443995000.A.910.html
推
10/05 05:44, , 1F
10/05 05:44, 1F
→
10/05 05:44, , 2F
10/05 05:44, 2F
ahq有練魔鬥的消息嗎?
→
10/05 05:45, , 3F
10/05 05:45, 3F
噓
10/05 05:45, , 4F
10/05 05:45, 4F
台灣阿離沒一個能打 幹
→
10/05 05:45, , 5F
10/05 05:45, 5F
推
10/05 05:46, , 6F
10/05 05:46, 6F
lulu應該不算很難吧 為什麼王爺不練我真心好奇
也可以當作是補助ad的不穩定性 而且也不太會被壓線有高保命/支援能力
※ 編輯: zz199227 (175.183.81.10), 10/05/2015 05:48:47
→
10/05 05:46, , 7F
10/05 05:46, 7F
→
10/05 05:47, , 8F
10/05 05:47, 8F
→
10/05 05:47, , 9F
10/05 05:47, 9F
推
10/05 05:47, , 10F
10/05 05:47, 10F
→
10/05 05:47, , 11F
10/05 05:47, 11F
→
10/05 05:48, , 12F
10/05 05:48, 12F
推
10/05 05:48, , 13F
10/05 05:48, 13F
幹...我越想越覺得lulu是ahq唯一救星
推
10/05 05:49, , 14F
10/05 05:49, 14F
推
10/05 05:49, , 15F
10/05 05:49, 15F
※ 編輯: zz199227 (175.183.81.10), 10/05/2015 05:50:53
→
10/05 05:50, , 16F
10/05 05:50, 16F
→
10/05 05:50, , 17F
10/05 05:50, 17F
推
10/05 05:50, , 18F
10/05 05:50, 18F
→
10/05 05:50, , 19F
10/05 05:50, 19F
推
10/05 05:51, , 20F
10/05 05:51, 20F
推
10/05 05:51, , 21F
10/05 05:51, 21F
→
10/05 05:51, , 22F
10/05 05:51, 22F
雖然這場勝負就差巴龍池前面那個嘲諷
但王爺這場也沒打出很高的影響力(大幾乎都是被開到拿來逃跑的)
我是覺得都有責任啦
→
10/05 05:52, , 23F
10/05 05:52, 23F
→
10/05 05:52, , 24F
10/05 05:52, 24F
→
10/05 05:52, , 25F
10/05 05:52, 25F
※ 編輯: zz199227 (175.183.81.10), 10/05/2015 05:55:01
→
10/05 05:52, , 26F
10/05 05:52, 26F
→
10/05 05:52, , 27F
10/05 05:52, 27F
推
10/05 05:53, , 28F
10/05 05:53, 28F
→
10/05 05:53, , 29F
10/05 05:53, 29F
→
10/05 05:54, , 30F
10/05 05:54, 30F
→
10/05 05:54, , 31F
10/05 05:54, 31F
推
10/05 05:55, , 32F
10/05 05:55, 32F
→
10/05 05:55, , 33F
10/05 05:55, 33F
→
10/05 05:55, , 34F
10/05 05:55, 34F
→
10/05 05:57, , 35F
10/05 05:57, 35F
→
10/05 05:57, , 36F
10/05 05:57, 36F
推
10/05 05:58, , 37F
10/05 05:58, 37F
推
10/05 05:58, , 38F
10/05 05:58, 38F
推
10/05 05:59, , 39F
10/05 05:59, 39F
→
10/05 05:59, , 40F
10/05 05:59, 40F
→
10/05 05:59, , 41F
10/05 05:59, 41F
推
10/05 05:59, , 42F
10/05 05:59, 42F
→
10/05 05:59, , 43F
10/05 05:59, 43F
→
10/05 06:00, , 44F
10/05 06:00, 44F
推
10/05 06:00, , 45F
10/05 06:00, 45F
推
10/05 06:01, , 46F
10/05 06:01, 46F
推
10/05 06:04, , 47F
10/05 06:04, 47F
→
10/05 06:05, , 48F
10/05 06:05, 48F
→
10/05 06:12, , 49F
10/05 06:12, 49F
→
10/05 06:12, , 50F
10/05 06:12, 50F
推
10/05 06:31, , 51F
10/05 06:31, 51F
推
10/05 06:32, , 52F
10/05 06:32, 52F
推
10/05 06:39, , 53F
10/05 06:39, 53F
噓
10/05 06:42, , 54F
10/05 06:42, 54F
推
10/05 07:25, , 55F
10/05 07:25, 55F
推
10/05 07:43, , 56F
10/05 07:43, 56F
推
10/05 07:43, , 57F
10/05 07:43, 57F
→
10/05 07:45, , 58F
10/05 07:45, 58F
推
10/05 07:53, , 59F
10/05 07:53, 59F
噓
10/05 08:26, , 60F
10/05 08:26, 60F
噓
10/05 08:31, , 61F
10/05 08:31, 61F
推
10/05 08:41, , 62F
10/05 08:41, 62F
推
10/05 08:46, , 63F
10/05 08:46, 63F
推
10/05 08:58, , 64F
10/05 08:58, 64F
推
10/05 09:00, , 65F
10/05 09:00, 65F
→
10/05 09:00, , 66F
10/05 09:00, 66F
推
10/05 09:05, , 67F
10/05 09:05, 67F
推
10/05 09:08, , 68F
10/05 09:08, 68F
推
10/05 09:08, , 69F
10/05 09:08, 69F
→
10/05 09:08, , 70F
10/05 09:08, 70F
→
10/05 09:08, , 71F
10/05 09:08, 71F
推
10/05 09:15, , 72F
10/05 09:15, 72F
推
10/05 09:18, , 73F
10/05 09:18, 73F
推
10/05 09:33, , 74F
10/05 09:33, 74F
推
10/05 10:13, , 75F
10/05 10:13, 75F
推
10/05 10:14, , 76F
10/05 10:14, 76F
推
10/05 10:27, , 77F
10/05 10:27, 77F
→
10/05 10:47, , 78F
10/05 10:47, 78F
→
10/05 10:49, , 79F
10/05 10:49, 79F
→
10/05 10:50, , 80F
10/05 10:50, 80F
→
10/05 10:59, , 81F
10/05 10:59, 81F
→
10/05 11:00, , 82F
10/05 11:00, 82F
→
10/05 11:01, , 83F
10/05 11:01, 83F
噓
10/05 11:03, , 84F
10/05 11:03, 84F
→
10/05 11:06, , 85F
10/05 11:06, 85F
→
10/05 11:07, , 86F
10/05 11:07, 86F
→
10/05 11:07, , 87F
10/05 11:07, 87F
推
10/05 12:05, , 88F
10/05 12:05, 88F
推
10/05 12:17, , 89F
10/05 12:17, 89F
推
10/05 12:50, , 90F
10/05 12:50, 90F
→
10/05 16:46, , 91F
10/05 16:46, 91F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):