Re: [問題] 大家覺得貝克是個怎麼樣的教練?消失
※ 引述《b9002052 (你好 我是黨工)》之銘言:
: 先說我很喜歡貝克這個人
: 也很喜歡AHQ這個隊伍
: 但是有幾點我一直無法想懂
: 貝克在當賽評的時候,對於敵方的B/P或是戰術等
: 都顯示出相當程度的了解,甚至有時會有神預測
: 但這一切卻沒有反映到AHQ的表現上頭
: 有種貝克似乎管不太動AHQ的感覺
: 另外貝克本身的問題就是戰術變化真的太少,或是很愛使用固定一套戰術
: 當初S3貝克只用一套戰術的時候,我還一直幫忙護航說一定是藏招
: 等到關鍵時刻大家就知道了,但事實就是我後來被打臉
: 一直到S4的時候,這種情況仍然沒有什麼改善。
: 想知道大家對於貝克的評價是如何?
感覺貝克不是沒有戰術只是沒辦法用而已
AHQ核心擺在中路,戰術選角都圍繞中路
當然西門真心很猛,單打幾乎都不會輸線
可是比賽幾乎都拿那幾隻刺客角
身為隊伍核心隊伍選角必須圍繞著他選
而刺客角拉打不行、控場不太行、適合打一波或BD
隊伍要配合中路刺客出打架陣最能發揮刺客的功能
但就是我這樣的低端都覺得現在打架陣不是那麼的強
再加上西門都被ban三隻,所以他會出什麼角色也很容易預測
然後隊伍的選角走向也很容易猜
從選角就被智商壓制,在加上技術其實落差不會太大
要贏真的很難
我是ahq粉希望最少能從小組賽出線阿
拜託夢不要繼續在門外了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.78.13.84
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1410320629.A.B54.html
推
09/10 11:45, , 1F
09/10 11:45, 1F
推
09/10 11:46, , 2F
09/10 11:46, 2F
推
09/10 11:46, , 3F
09/10 11:46, 3F
→
09/10 11:47, , 4F
09/10 11:47, 4F
→
09/10 11:48, , 5F
09/10 11:48, 5F
推
09/10 11:49, , 6F
09/10 11:49, 6F
→
09/10 11:49, , 7F
09/10 11:49, 7F
→
09/10 11:49, , 8F
09/10 11:49, 8F
推
09/10 11:49, , 9F
09/10 11:49, 9F
推
09/10 11:49, , 10F
09/10 11:49, 10F
→
09/10 11:49, , 11F
09/10 11:49, 11F
→
09/10 11:50, , 12F
09/10 11:50, 12F
→
09/10 11:50, , 13F
09/10 11:50, 13F
推
09/10 11:51, , 14F
09/10 11:51, 14F
→
09/10 11:51, , 15F
09/10 11:51, 15F
推
09/10 11:53, , 16F
09/10 11:53, 16F
推
09/10 11:53, , 17F
09/10 11:53, 17F
推
09/10 11:53, , 18F
09/10 11:53, 18F
→
09/10 11:53, , 19F
09/10 11:53, 19F
推
09/10 11:54, , 20F
09/10 11:54, 20F
推
09/10 11:56, , 21F
09/10 11:56, 21F
推
09/10 11:56, , 22F
09/10 11:56, 22F
→
09/10 11:56, , 23F
09/10 11:56, 23F
推
09/10 11:57, , 24F
09/10 11:57, 24F
→
09/10 11:57, , 25F
09/10 11:57, 25F
→
09/10 11:57, , 26F
09/10 11:57, 26F
推
09/10 11:57, , 27F
09/10 11:57, 27F
→
09/10 11:58, , 28F
09/10 11:58, 28F
推
09/10 11:58, , 29F
09/10 11:58, 29F
推
09/10 11:59, , 30F
09/10 11:59, 30F
推
09/10 12:00, , 31F
09/10 12:00, 31F
推
09/10 12:01, , 32F
09/10 12:01, 32F
→
09/10 12:01, , 33F
09/10 12:01, 33F
推
09/10 12:02, , 34F
09/10 12:02, 34F
推
09/10 12:02, , 35F
09/10 12:02, 35F
推
09/10 12:03, , 36F
09/10 12:03, 36F
推
09/10 12:03, , 37F
09/10 12:03, 37F
→
09/10 12:03, , 38F
09/10 12:03, 38F
→
09/10 12:03, , 39F
09/10 12:03, 39F
還有 140 則推文
還有 9 段內文
→
09/10 14:46, , 180F
09/10 14:46, 180F
→
09/10 14:46, , 181F
09/10 14:46, 181F
→
09/10 14:46, , 182F
09/10 14:46, 182F
→
09/10 14:47, , 183F
09/10 14:47, 183F
→
09/10 14:48, , 184F
09/10 14:48, 184F
→
09/10 14:48, , 185F
09/10 14:48, 185F
→
09/10 14:49, , 186F
09/10 14:49, 186F
→
09/10 14:49, , 187F
09/10 14:49, 187F
→
09/10 14:50, , 188F
09/10 14:50, 188F
推
09/10 14:50, , 189F
09/10 14:50, 189F
→
09/10 14:51, , 190F
09/10 14:51, 190F
→
09/10 14:51, , 191F
09/10 14:51, 191F
推
09/10 14:51, , 192F
09/10 14:51, 192F
→
09/10 14:51, , 193F
09/10 14:51, 193F
→
09/10 14:52, , 194F
09/10 14:52, 194F
推
09/10 14:53, , 195F
09/10 14:53, 195F
→
09/10 14:53, , 196F
09/10 14:53, 196F
→
09/10 14:53, , 197F
09/10 14:53, 197F
→
09/10 14:53, , 198F
09/10 14:53, 198F
→
09/10 14:53, , 199F
09/10 14:53, 199F
→
09/10 14:53, , 200F
09/10 14:53, 200F
→
09/10 14:54, , 201F
09/10 14:54, 201F
→
09/10 14:55, , 202F
09/10 14:55, 202F
→
09/10 14:55, , 203F
09/10 14:55, 203F
→
09/10 14:56, , 204F
09/10 14:56, 204F
→
09/10 14:56, , 205F
09/10 14:56, 205F
→
09/10 14:58, , 206F
09/10 14:58, 206F
推
09/10 15:00, , 207F
09/10 15:00, 207F
→
09/10 15:01, , 208F
09/10 15:01, 208F
→
09/10 15:01, , 209F
09/10 15:01, 209F
→
09/10 15:02, , 210F
09/10 15:02, 210F
→
09/10 15:02, , 211F
09/10 15:02, 211F
→
09/10 15:02, , 212F
09/10 15:02, 212F
→
09/10 17:00, , 213F
09/10 17:00, 213F
他角色很多啊...只是性質都很雷同而已
※ 編輯: k258610 (42.78.13.84), 09/10/2014 17:35:21
→
09/10 17:54, , 214F
09/10 17:54, 214F
推
09/10 19:05, , 215F
09/10 19:05, 215F
→
09/10 19:07, , 216F
09/10 19:07, 216F
→
09/10 19:08, , 217F
09/10 19:08, 217F
噓
09/10 21:13, , 218F
09/10 21:13, 218F
討論串 (同標題文章)