※ 引述《takizawahide (Val Valentino)》之銘言:
: 如果說熱火可以靠三巨頭 那為何湖人不能遵循這個模式呢???
熱火還沒靠三巨頭拿冠軍
超賽雖號稱三巨頭,Allen可是轉職成專業射手,內線還是一堆扛
湖人已經證明現在的陣容可以拿冠軍,要換球員也是換湯不換藥
怎麼會把中鋒拿換掉,換了Anthony打法不就要全部重新改過
連我都想跳出來說................誰敢動我Bynum..........
要想找接班,兩年後
換Dwight Howard比較實際也可行
薪資差不多加上1.2個配菜可行,只要Howard想來湖人,學學Anthony
絕對來的成
至於現階段................誰敢動我Bynum................
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.170.107.129
推
02/10 00:54, , 1F
02/10 00:54, 1F
推
02/10 00:56, , 2F
02/10 00:56, 2F
推
02/10 00:56, , 3F
02/10 00:56, 3F
推
02/10 00:59, , 4F
02/10 00:59, 4F
→
02/10 01:00, , 5F
02/10 01:00, 5F
推
02/10 01:01, , 6F
02/10 01:01, 6F
→
02/10 01:02, , 7F
02/10 01:02, 7F
→
02/10 01:02, , 8F
02/10 01:02, 8F
推
02/10 01:02, , 9F
02/10 01:02, 9F
→
02/10 01:02, , 10F
02/10 01:02, 10F
→
02/10 01:03, , 11F
02/10 01:03, 11F
→
02/10 01:04, , 12F
02/10 01:04, 12F
→
02/10 01:05, , 13F
02/10 01:05, 13F
推
02/10 01:05, , 14F
02/10 01:05, 14F
→
02/10 01:05, , 15F
02/10 01:05, 15F
推
02/10 01:06, , 16F
02/10 01:06, 16F
→
02/10 01:06, , 17F
02/10 01:06, 17F
→
02/10 01:06, , 18F
02/10 01:06, 18F
推
02/10 01:06, , 19F
02/10 01:06, 19F
推
02/10 01:06, , 20F
02/10 01:06, 20F
→
02/10 01:07, , 21F
02/10 01:07, 21F
→
02/10 01:07, , 22F
02/10 01:07, 22F
→
02/10 01:07, , 23F
02/10 01:07, 23F
→
02/10 01:08, , 24F
02/10 01:08, 24F
→
02/10 01:09, , 25F
02/10 01:09, 25F
推
02/10 01:09, , 26F
02/10 01:09, 26F
→
02/10 01:09, , 27F
02/10 01:09, 27F
→
02/10 01:10, , 28F
02/10 01:10, 28F
推
02/10 01:10, , 29F
02/10 01:10, 29F
→
02/10 01:10, , 30F
02/10 01:10, 30F
推
02/10 01:11, , 31F
02/10 01:11, 31F
推
02/10 01:12, , 32F
02/10 01:12, 32F
→
02/10 01:12, , 33F
02/10 01:12, 33F
→
02/10 01:13, , 34F
02/10 01:13, 34F
推
02/10 01:13, , 35F
02/10 01:13, 35F
→
02/10 01:13, , 36F
02/10 01:13, 36F
→
02/10 01:13, , 37F
02/10 01:13, 37F
→
02/10 01:14, , 38F
02/10 01:14, 38F
推
02/10 01:15, , 39F
02/10 01:15, 39F
→
02/10 01:15, , 40F
02/10 01:15, 40F
→
02/10 01:15, , 41F
02/10 01:15, 41F
推
02/10 01:16, , 42F
02/10 01:16, 42F
推
02/10 01:16, , 43F
02/10 01:16, 43F
→
02/10 01:17, , 44F
02/10 01:17, 44F
→
02/10 01:18, , 45F
02/10 01:18, 45F
推
02/10 01:18, , 46F
02/10 01:18, 46F
推
02/10 01:19, , 47F
02/10 01:19, 47F
→
02/10 01:21, , 48F
02/10 01:21, 48F
推
02/10 01:28, , 49F
02/10 01:28, 49F
→
02/10 01:29, , 50F
02/10 01:29, 50F
推
02/10 01:31, , 51F
02/10 01:31, 51F
→
02/10 01:32, , 52F
02/10 01:32, 52F
推
02/10 01:39, , 53F
02/10 01:39, 53F
推
02/10 01:43, , 54F
02/10 01:43, 54F
→
02/10 01:52, , 55F
02/10 01:52, 55F
推
02/10 08:26, , 56F
02/10 08:26, 56F
→
08/08 13:19, , 57F
08/08 13:19, 57F
→
09/11 02:30, , 58F
09/11 02:30, 58F
→
09/11 05:06, , 59F
09/11 05:06, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
閒聊
47
118
以下文章回應了本文:
閒聊
10
21
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):
閒聊
47
118
閒聊
25
59
閒聊
10
21
閒聊
4
7