Re: [問題] 為什麼高雄版的風向與現實差這麼多?消失
跟大家分享一個好笑的事情
在政黑看到一個ID說在這裡打趴許多綠黨工,結果特地回來查
他就發了兩篇新聞而已,這能算是戰贏?
再分享另一件更好笑的事情,當有人罵韓國瑜的時候,韓粉就貼上標籤:怕了
照這個邏輯思維,我想北市選情,阿伯超級不樂觀
姚最可能翻盤,丁丁次之
最後,只要是韓國瑜的政策,不管再怎麼不切實際,他都是"有在為高雄想"
陳其邁的政策則通通都是"開空頭支票"
同樣地,按照這個邏輯思維。這次選舉,為了北市想的最多的是機關槍抱貓的
其次是丁丁
這種簡直就是專門來替對手煽動票數的做法,只能說
科科
--
羽毛未豐的片片翅翼,零落四散在各個時間的夢想
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 150.117.119.198
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Kaohsiung/M.1538424665.A.DEC.html
※ 編輯: fragmentwing (150.117.119.198), 10/02/2018 04:15:52
→
10/02 07:51, , 1F
10/02 07:51, 1F
推
10/02 07:53, , 2F
10/02 07:53, 2F
推
10/02 07:55, , 3F
10/02 07:55, 3F
推
10/02 08:10, , 4F
10/02 08:10, 4F
推
10/02 08:15, , 5F
10/02 08:15, 5F
推
10/02 08:44, , 6F
10/02 08:44, 6F
→
10/02 08:49, , 7F
10/02 08:49, 7F
推
10/02 09:16, , 8F
10/02 09:16, 8F
推
10/02 09:38, , 9F
10/02 09:38, 9F
推
10/02 09:40, , 10F
10/02 09:40, 10F
推
10/02 09:42, , 11F
10/02 09:42, 11F
→
10/02 09:42, , 12F
10/02 09:42, 12F
→
10/02 09:42, , 13F
10/02 09:42, 13F
推
10/02 09:43, , 14F
10/02 09:43, 14F
→
10/02 09:46, , 15F
10/02 09:46, 15F
→
10/02 09:46, , 16F
10/02 09:46, 16F
→
10/02 09:47, , 17F
10/02 09:47, 17F
→
10/02 09:48, , 18F
10/02 09:48, 18F
→
10/02 09:49, , 19F
10/02 09:49, 19F
→
10/02 09:50, , 20F
10/02 09:50, 20F
推
10/02 09:51, , 21F
10/02 09:51, 21F
→
10/02 09:51, , 22F
10/02 09:51, 22F
推
10/02 09:54, , 23F
10/02 09:54, 23F
→
10/02 09:55, , 24F
10/02 09:55, 24F
→
10/02 10:05, , 25F
10/02 10:05, 25F
→
10/02 10:32, , 26F
10/02 10:32, 26F
推
10/02 10:42, , 27F
10/02 10:42, 27F
→
10/02 10:42, , 28F
10/02 10:42, 28F
推
10/02 11:32, , 29F
10/02 11:32, 29F
推
10/02 11:36, , 30F
10/02 11:36, 30F
→
10/02 11:36, , 31F
10/02 11:36, 31F
→
10/02 11:37, , 32F
10/02 11:37, 32F
噓
10/02 11:50, , 33F
10/02 11:50, 33F
→
10/02 11:50, , 34F
10/02 11:50, 34F
推
10/02 11:59, , 35F
10/02 11:59, 35F
→
10/02 12:02, , 36F
10/02 12:02, 36F
→
10/02 12:03, , 37F
10/02 12:03, 37F
→
10/02 12:03, , 38F
10/02 12:03, 38F
→
10/02 12:04, , 39F
10/02 12:04, 39F
推
10/02 12:07, , 40F
10/02 12:07, 40F
→
10/02 12:07, , 41F
10/02 12:07, 41F
→
10/02 12:07, , 42F
10/02 12:07, 42F
推
10/02 12:15, , 43F
10/02 12:15, 43F
→
10/02 12:15, , 44F
10/02 12:15, 44F
→
10/02 12:15, , 45F
10/02 12:15, 45F
推
10/02 12:18, , 46F
10/02 12:18, 46F
→
10/02 12:18, , 47F
10/02 12:18, 47F
→
10/02 12:18, , 48F
10/02 12:18, 48F
→
10/02 13:14, , 49F
10/02 13:14, 49F
→
10/02 13:15, , 50F
10/02 13:15, 50F
→
10/02 13:16, , 51F
10/02 13:16, 51F
→
10/02 13:16, , 52F
10/02 13:16, 52F
推
10/02 13:26, , 53F
10/02 13:26, 53F
推
10/02 13:26, , 54F
10/02 13:26, 54F
推
10/02 14:29, , 55F
10/02 14:29, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 7 篇):