[新聞] 韓國瑜開發太平島政見 曾登島的馬英九加碼消失
韓國瑜開發太平島政見 曾登島的馬英九加碼
針對國民黨高雄市參選人韓國瑜提出開發太平島政見,遭網友抨擊,前總統馬英九昨天南
下高雄輔選時,卻認為韓國瑜開發太平島觀光及天然資源,不僅可為高雄帶來財富,也有
助化解南海緊張局勢。
韓國瑜曾提出太平島股票上市,開發石油及可燃冰的構想,來解決高雄負債的問題,引發
許多議論。馬英九指出,韓國瑜這項政見令人眼睛一亮,為什麼以前都沒有人提過。據中
央社報導,馬英九還表示,兩年前他曾登上太平島,親眼目堵島上天然資源豐富,水質好
的可以養魚,全島不僅適合人居,也值得發展觀光,附近海底還被發現可能有石油,太平
島未來無論開發觀光或石油都很有前景。
馬英九還加碼建議,太平島屬高雄市旗津區,未來開發不僅可為高雄帶來財富,也可藉由
國際合作開發,化解當前南海緊張情勢,但前提是要改善島上的航空交通,因為當地機場
跑道不夠長,民航機無法降落。
馬英九2年前不顧美國反對,曾以春節訪視與慰勞駐島人員為由登島視察。並提出打造太
平島成為「和平救難之島」、「生態之島」與「低碳之島」。另外也表示太平島一直都有
豐沛、優質、足以維持人類生存的淡水,島上有4口井,每天可產生65噸的淡水,淡水含
量平均為92%,水質良好。
(中時電子報)
https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181001000797-260407
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.226.112.6
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Kaohsiung/M.1538364124.A.888.html
→
10/01 11:23, , 1F
10/01 11:23, 1F
噓
10/01 11:24, , 2F
10/01 11:24, 2F
推
10/01 11:25, , 3F
10/01 11:25, 3F
噓
10/01 11:27, , 4F
10/01 11:27, 4F
→
10/01 11:27, , 5F
10/01 11:27, 5F
噓
10/01 11:28, , 6F
10/01 11:28, 6F
噓
10/01 11:28, , 7F
10/01 11:28, 7F
噓
10/01 11:28, , 8F
10/01 11:28, 8F
噓
10/01 11:29, , 9F
10/01 11:29, 9F
噓
10/01 11:30, , 10F
10/01 11:30, 10F
噓
10/01 11:32, , 11F
10/01 11:32, 11F
噓
10/01 11:34, , 12F
10/01 11:34, 12F
→
10/01 11:34, , 13F
10/01 11:34, 13F
推
10/01 11:36, , 14F
10/01 11:36, 14F
→
10/01 11:38, , 15F
10/01 11:38, 15F
噓
10/01 11:39, , 16F
10/01 11:39, 16F
→
10/01 11:39, , 17F
10/01 11:39, 17F
→
10/01 11:40, , 18F
10/01 11:40, 18F
→
10/01 11:40, , 19F
10/01 11:40, 19F
→
10/01 11:42, , 20F
10/01 11:42, 20F
→
10/01 11:43, , 21F
10/01 11:43, 21F
→
10/01 11:44, , 22F
10/01 11:44, 22F
→
10/01 11:45, , 23F
10/01 11:45, 23F
推
10/01 11:45, , 24F
10/01 11:45, 24F
→
10/01 11:45, , 25F
10/01 11:45, 25F
→
10/01 11:48, , 26F
10/01 11:48, 26F
推
10/01 11:49, , 27F
10/01 11:49, 27F
→
10/01 11:49, , 28F
10/01 11:49, 28F
噓
10/01 11:50, , 29F
10/01 11:50, 29F
噓
10/01 11:50, , 30F
10/01 11:50, 30F
噓
10/01 11:51, , 31F
10/01 11:51, 31F
噓
10/01 11:52, , 32F
10/01 11:52, 32F
推
10/01 11:53, , 33F
10/01 11:53, 33F
→
10/01 11:54, , 34F
10/01 11:54, 34F
→
10/01 11:54, , 35F
10/01 11:54, 35F
噓
10/01 11:54, , 36F
10/01 11:54, 36F
→
10/01 11:55, , 37F
10/01 11:55, 37F
推
10/01 11:55, , 38F
10/01 11:55, 38F
噓
10/01 11:56, , 39F
10/01 11:56, 39F
噓
10/01 11:56, , 40F
10/01 11:56, 40F
→
10/01 11:56, , 41F
10/01 11:56, 41F
噓
10/01 11:56, , 42F
10/01 11:56, 42F
→
10/01 11:57, , 43F
10/01 11:57, 43F
→
10/01 11:57, , 44F
10/01 11:57, 44F
→
10/01 11:57, , 45F
10/01 11:57, 45F
推
10/01 11:57, , 46F
10/01 11:57, 46F
→
10/01 11:58, , 47F
10/01 11:58, 47F
推
10/01 11:58, , 48F
10/01 11:58, 48F
→
10/01 11:59, , 49F
10/01 11:59, 49F
→
10/01 11:59, , 50F
10/01 11:59, 50F
→
10/01 11:59, , 51F
10/01 11:59, 51F
→
10/01 12:00, , 52F
10/01 12:00, 52F
推
10/01 12:02, , 53F
10/01 12:02, 53F
→
10/01 12:03, , 54F
10/01 12:03, 54F
推
10/01 12:05, , 55F
10/01 12:05, 55F
噓
10/01 12:05, , 56F
10/01 12:05, 56F
推
10/01 12:05, , 57F
10/01 12:05, 57F
→
10/01 12:05, , 58F
10/01 12:05, 58F
噓
10/01 12:06, , 59F
10/01 12:06, 59F
→
10/01 12:06, , 60F
10/01 12:06, 60F
→
10/01 12:06, , 61F
10/01 12:06, 61F
→
10/01 12:06, , 62F
10/01 12:06, 62F
→
10/01 12:08, , 63F
10/01 12:08, 63F
噓
10/01 12:08, , 64F
10/01 12:08, 64F
→
10/01 12:08, , 65F
10/01 12:08, 65F
噓
10/01 12:12, , 66F
10/01 12:12, 66F
噓
10/01 12:16, , 67F
10/01 12:16, 67F
噓
10/01 12:18, , 68F
10/01 12:18, 68F
噓
10/01 12:20, , 69F
10/01 12:20, 69F
→
10/01 12:22, , 70F
10/01 12:22, 70F
噓
10/01 12:24, , 71F
10/01 12:24, 71F
噓
10/01 12:26, , 72F
10/01 12:26, 72F
→
10/01 12:26, , 73F
10/01 12:26, 73F
→
10/01 12:26, , 74F
10/01 12:26, 74F
→
10/01 12:26, , 75F
10/01 12:26, 75F
→
10/01 12:26, , 76F
10/01 12:26, 76F
→
10/01 12:26, , 77F
10/01 12:26, 77F
噓
10/01 12:28, , 78F
10/01 12:28, 78F
→
10/01 12:29, , 79F
10/01 12:29, 79F
噓
10/01 12:45, , 80F
10/01 12:45, 80F
噓
10/01 13:53, , 81F
10/01 13:53, 81F
噓
10/01 15:54, , 82F
10/01 15:54, 82F
噓
10/01 18:37, , 83F
10/01 18:37, 83F
推
10/01 18:48, , 84F
10/01 18:48, 84F
噓
10/01 22:18, , 85F
10/01 22:18, 85F
噓
10/01 22:40, , 86F
10/01 22:40, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):