[閒聊] 高雄的登革熱疫情是不是不重要?已回收
電視完全沒報高雄的登革熱疫情,是不是高雄的登革熱疫情不重要?
看到病例數以突破7000,這幾天更是可以討戰8000,如現在是高峰的話,照鐘形曲線來估,最後的總數甚至有可能達到16000
昨天還死了第七個人,接下來也有可能有人在因此喪生
但電視主流媒體漠不關心,沒題如果是因為有更重要的事情就算了,結果是用一些雞毛蒜皮的小事來取而代之
像是
台北有嬰兒車被車門夾到
http://ppt.cc/9isG
外國飯店訂房定不到
http://ppt.cc/0zCr
一個和尚在水上走木板
http://ppt.cc/BgJJ
更扯的還有
還有為了撿10援手被卡住的勒
那麼多人被隔離,甚至喪生比不上這些雞毛蒜皮的小事嘛!?
第四臺接線率還有5成,稍微題一下,讓這龐大數目的5成經過高雄記得擦防蚊液,讓高雄市民提高警覺,記得清理積水,是這麼奢求的事情
但主流新聞是怎樣?"隻" "字" "未" "題"
八卦版也沒什麼聊到
也只有非常少數的網路新聞有稍微提及
是不是其實登革熱就像小朋友發燒感冒一樣,是小case?還是我們的地位太低,不夠格上新聞?連政令宣導都沒有?
真不知道這些電視台或是報社是在想什麼
真是令人生氣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.232.248.4
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Kaohsiung/M.1414551769.A.555.html
推
10/29 11:05, , 1F
10/29 11:05, 1F
→
10/29 11:05, , 2F
10/29 11:05, 2F
→
10/29 11:06, , 3F
10/29 11:06, 3F
推
10/29 11:07, , 4F
10/29 11:07, 4F
→
10/29 11:10, , 5F
10/29 11:10, 5F
推
10/29 11:11, , 6F
10/29 11:11, 6F
推
10/29 11:12, , 7F
10/29 11:12, 7F
→
10/29 11:12, , 8F
10/29 11:12, 8F
推
10/29 11:12, , 9F
10/29 11:12, 9F
→
10/29 11:22, , 10F
10/29 11:22, 10F
推
10/29 11:22, , 11F
10/29 11:22, 11F
推
10/29 11:24, , 12F
10/29 11:24, 12F
→
10/29 11:26, , 13F
10/29 11:26, 13F
推
10/29 11:29, , 14F
10/29 11:29, 14F
→
10/29 11:31, , 15F
10/29 11:31, 15F
→
10/29 11:32, , 16F
10/29 11:32, 16F
推
10/29 11:34, , 17F
10/29 11:34, 17F
→
10/29 11:34, , 18F
10/29 11:34, 18F
→
10/29 11:35, , 19F
10/29 11:35, 19F
推
10/29 11:36, , 20F
10/29 11:36, 20F
推
10/29 11:45, , 21F
10/29 11:45, 21F
推
10/29 11:45, , 22F
10/29 11:45, 22F
→
10/29 12:01, , 23F
10/29 12:01, 23F
→
10/29 12:02, , 24F
10/29 12:02, 24F
→
10/29 12:04, , 25F
10/29 12:04, 25F
→
10/29 12:08, , 26F
10/29 12:08, 26F
→
10/29 12:09, , 27F
10/29 12:09, 27F
→
10/29 12:09, , 28F
10/29 12:09, 28F
推
10/29 12:11, , 29F
10/29 12:11, 29F
→
10/29 12:19, , 30F
10/29 12:19, 30F
推
10/29 12:36, , 31F
10/29 12:36, 31F
→
10/29 12:36, , 32F
10/29 12:36, 32F
→
10/29 12:37, , 33F
10/29 12:37, 33F
→
10/29 12:42, , 34F
10/29 12:42, 34F
→
10/29 12:45, , 35F
10/29 12:45, 35F
推
10/29 13:27, , 36F
10/29 13:27, 36F
→
10/29 13:27, , 37F
10/29 13:27, 37F
→
10/29 13:32, , 38F
10/29 13:32, 38F
→
10/29 13:50, , 39F
10/29 13:50, 39F
推
10/29 14:12, , 40F
10/29 14:12, 40F
推
10/29 14:29, , 41F
10/29 14:29, 41F
推
10/29 14:58, , 42F
10/29 14:58, 42F
推
10/29 15:38, , 43F
10/29 15:38, 43F
推
10/29 17:28, , 44F
10/29 17:28, 44F
推
10/29 17:41, , 45F
10/29 17:41, 45F
推
10/29 19:35, , 46F
10/29 19:35, 46F
→
10/29 21:10, , 47F
10/29 21:10, 47F
→
10/29 21:11, , 48F
10/29 21:11, 48F
→
10/29 21:12, , 49F
10/29 21:12, 49F
→
10/29 21:12, , 50F
10/29 21:12, 50F
推
10/30 09:47, , 51F
10/30 09:47, 51F
推
10/30 19:00, , 52F
10/30 19:00, 52F
推
11/08 01:14, , 53F
11/08 01:14, 53F
→
11/08 01:14, , 54F
11/08 01:14, 54F
推
11/08 09:30, , 55F
11/08 09:30, 55F
→
11/08 19:40, , 56F
11/08 19:40, 56F
→
11/08 19:41, , 57F
11/08 19:41, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 13 篇):