Re: [討教] 為什麼華山派劍宗比氣宗強那麼多?
不論當年真相如何,
但岳不群真的很適合當華山掌門,
因為這就是個口嫌體正直的門派啊,
氣宗嘴裡說氣為主,
但用三仙劍也沒在手軟的,
劍宗嘴裡說招式為主,
但也沒少練內力,
若不是紫霞功是掌門限定,
我想劍宗能練也會撿去練。
不過以金老的武功概念,
內力大成後,
招式就很好練了,
在這個前提之下,
氣宗才是王道無誤,
岳不群用起三仙劍會輸封不平嗎?
反正打贏了說了算,
也還好這個門派自爆,
不然這種偽君子派當五岳盟主還真是不知所謂,
應該會開始說其他四岳的武功是垃圾,
我們華山派只收精英,不收垃圾之類的屁話…
當然,前提是建立在紫霞功是頂級內功,
比肩九陽之流,
不然一個二流內功,
練到頂也沒「內力大成,招式速成」的效果,
那劍氣之爭,
也只是兩派井底蛙以管窺豹後的廢物內鬥而已…
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.181.154.248
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/JinYong/M.1475954857.A.DEC.html
※ 編輯: Kaili (175.181.154.248), 10/09/2016 03:29:04
※ 編輯: Kaili (175.181.154.248), 10/09/2016 03:38:31
※ 編輯: Kaili (175.181.154.248), 10/09/2016 03:39:02
推
10/09 03:52, , 1F
10/09 03:52, 1F
→
10/09 03:55, , 2F
10/09 03:55, 2F
→
10/09 03:55, , 3F
10/09 03:55, 3F
→
10/09 04:04, , 4F
10/09 04:04, 4F
推
10/09 04:31, , 5F
10/09 04:31, 5F
→
10/09 04:32, , 6F
10/09 04:32, 6F
→
10/09 04:33, , 7F
10/09 04:33, 7F
→
10/09 04:33, , 8F
10/09 04:33, 8F
→
10/09 04:35, , 9F
10/09 04:35, 9F
→
10/09 04:35, , 10F
10/09 04:35, 10F
→
10/09 04:36, , 11F
10/09 04:36, 11F
→
10/09 04:36, , 12F
10/09 04:36, 12F
→
10/09 04:37, , 13F
10/09 04:37, 13F
→
10/09 04:37, , 14F
10/09 04:37, 14F
推
10/09 04:57, , 15F
10/09 04:57, 15F
→
10/09 04:57, , 16F
10/09 04:57, 16F
→
10/09 08:02, , 17F
10/09 08:02, 17F
→
10/09 08:03, , 18F
10/09 08:03, 18F
推
10/09 09:47, , 19F
10/09 09:47, 19F
推
10/09 09:49, , 20F
10/09 09:49, 20F
→
10/09 09:49, , 21F
10/09 09:49, 21F
推
10/09 09:52, , 22F
10/09 09:52, 22F
→
10/09 09:52, , 23F
10/09 09:52, 23F
推
10/09 10:03, , 24F
10/09 10:03, 24F
→
10/09 10:04, , 25F
10/09 10:04, 25F
→
10/09 10:04, , 26F
10/09 10:04, 26F
推
10/09 10:07, , 27F
10/09 10:07, 27F
→
10/09 10:08, , 28F
10/09 10:08, 28F
→
10/09 10:09, , 29F
10/09 10:09, 29F
→
10/09 10:09, , 30F
10/09 10:09, 30F
推
10/09 10:10, , 31F
10/09 10:10, 31F
→
10/09 10:10, , 32F
10/09 10:10, 32F
→
10/09 10:10, , 33F
10/09 10:10, 33F
→
10/09 10:12, , 34F
10/09 10:12, 34F
→
10/09 10:12, , 35F
10/09 10:12, 35F
→
10/09 10:20, , 36F
10/09 10:20, 36F
推
10/09 10:22, , 37F
10/09 10:22, 37F
→
10/09 10:23, , 38F
10/09 10:23, 38F
→
10/09 10:23, , 39F
10/09 10:23, 39F
還有 92 則推文
→
10/09 12:42, , 132F
10/09 12:42, 132F
→
10/09 12:42, , 133F
10/09 12:42, 133F
→
10/09 12:43, , 134F
10/09 12:43, 134F
推
10/09 13:05, , 135F
10/09 13:05, 135F
推
10/09 13:05, , 136F
10/09 13:05, 136F
→
10/09 13:05, , 137F
10/09 13:05, 137F
推
10/09 13:38, , 138F
10/09 13:38, 138F
推
10/09 13:40, , 139F
10/09 13:40, 139F
推
10/09 14:00, , 140F
10/09 14:00, 140F
→
10/09 14:01, , 141F
10/09 14:01, 141F
推
10/09 14:05, , 142F
10/09 14:05, 142F
→
10/09 14:05, , 143F
10/09 14:05, 143F
→
10/09 14:11, , 144F
10/09 14:11, 144F
推
10/09 14:38, , 145F
10/09 14:38, 145F
→
10/09 14:39, , 146F
10/09 14:39, 146F
→
10/09 14:39, , 147F
10/09 14:39, 147F
推
10/09 14:39, , 148F
10/09 14:39, 148F
→
10/09 14:40, , 149F
10/09 14:40, 149F
→
10/09 14:40, , 150F
10/09 14:40, 150F
→
10/09 14:41, , 151F
10/09 14:41, 151F
推
10/09 14:42, , 152F
10/09 14:42, 152F
→
10/09 14:42, , 153F
10/09 14:42, 153F
推
10/09 19:45, , 154F
10/09 19:45, 154F
→
10/09 19:46, , 155F
10/09 19:46, 155F
→
10/09 19:57, , 156F
10/09 19:57, 156F
推
10/09 21:03, , 157F
10/09 21:03, 157F
推
10/09 21:05, , 158F
10/09 21:05, 158F
推
10/10 00:30, , 159F
10/10 00:30, 159F
推
10/10 08:52, , 160F
10/10 08:52, 160F
推
10/10 09:03, , 161F
10/10 09:03, 161F
→
10/10 09:17, , 162F
10/10 09:17, 162F
※ 編輯: Kaili (175.181.154.248), 10/10/2016 09:21:28
→
10/10 15:24, , 163F
10/10 15:24, 163F
→
10/10 15:25, , 164F
10/10 15:25, 164F
→
10/10 15:26, , 165F
10/10 15:26, 165F
→
10/10 18:58, , 166F
10/10 18:58, 166F
→
10/10 19:01, , 167F
10/10 19:01, 167F
→
10/10 19:01, , 168F
10/10 19:01, 168F
→
10/10 19:02, , 169F
10/10 19:02, 169F
→
10/10 19:02, , 170F
10/10 19:02, 170F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 16 之 25 篇):