[討教] 為什麼金庸要給獨孤求敗劍魔的稱號
魔這個字 在中文裡 不論單獨一字或連
詞使用 都是負面意義居多 而且在武俠
小說及金庸書中 魔這個字也並未被賦
予新的意義 那為什麼金庸要給獨孤求
敗「劍魔」的外號? 反而像劍神 劍聖
這種不用?(雖然劍神給了卓不凡 但
這是後面的創作)我自己覺得是否跟誤
傷義士不祥一事有關? 在這之前是否
他劍法上帶給人一種左道偏鋒 入魔的
感覺呢 也因此才誤傷義士? 大家覺得呢
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.78.114.103
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/JinYong/M.1427866046.A.BAF.html
推
04/01 13:34, , 1F
04/01 13:34, 1F
推
04/01 13:41, , 2F
04/01 13:41, 2F
推
04/01 13:59, , 3F
04/01 13:59, 3F
→
04/01 13:59, , 4F
04/01 13:59, 4F
→
04/01 14:00, , 5F
04/01 14:00, 5F
→
04/01 14:00, , 6F
04/01 14:00, 6F
→
04/01 14:00, , 7F
04/01 14:00, 7F
推
04/01 14:12, , 8F
04/01 14:12, 8F
→
04/01 14:45, , 9F
04/01 14:45, 9F
→
04/01 14:46, , 10F
04/01 14:46, 10F
推
04/01 15:06, , 11F
04/01 15:06, 11F
推
04/01 15:10, , 12F
04/01 15:10, 12F
→
04/01 15:19, , 13F
04/01 15:19, 13F
→
04/01 15:45, , 14F
04/01 15:45, 14F
推
04/01 16:03, , 15F
04/01 16:03, 15F
推
04/01 16:11, , 16F
04/01 16:11, 16F
推
04/01 16:13, , 17F
04/01 16:13, 17F
→
04/01 16:14, , 18F
04/01 16:14, 18F
→
04/01 16:20, , 19F
04/01 16:20, 19F
→
04/01 17:00, , 20F
04/01 17:00, 20F
推
04/01 17:16, , 21F
04/01 17:16, 21F
推
04/01 17:38, , 22F
04/01 17:38, 22F
→
04/01 17:38, , 23F
04/01 17:38, 23F
→
04/01 17:39, , 24F
04/01 17:39, 24F
→
04/01 17:39, , 25F
04/01 17:39, 25F
→
04/01 17:40, , 26F
04/01 17:40, 26F
→
04/01 18:01, , 27F
04/01 18:01, 27F
→
04/01 18:09, , 28F
04/01 18:09, 28F
推
04/01 18:36, , 29F
04/01 18:36, 29F
推
04/01 18:43, , 30F
04/01 18:43, 30F
→
04/01 18:43, , 31F
04/01 18:43, 31F
→
04/01 19:07, , 32F
04/01 19:07, 32F
推
04/01 19:21, , 33F
04/01 19:21, 33F
→
04/01 20:16, , 34F
04/01 20:16, 34F
→
04/01 20:16, , 35F
04/01 20:16, 35F
推
04/01 21:06, , 36F
04/01 21:06, 36F
推
04/01 21:10, , 37F
04/01 21:10, 37F
推
04/01 21:12, , 38F
04/01 21:12, 38F
→
04/01 21:12, , 39F
04/01 21:12, 39F
→
04/01 21:12, , 40F
04/01 21:12, 40F
→
04/01 22:49, , 41F
04/01 22:49, 41F
推
04/01 23:01, , 42F
04/01 23:01, 42F
→
04/01 23:01, , 43F
04/01 23:01, 43F
噓
04/01 23:02, , 44F
04/01 23:02, 44F
推
04/01 23:37, , 45F
04/01 23:37, 45F
推
04/02 02:19, , 46F
04/02 02:19, 46F
→
04/02 02:19, , 47F
04/02 02:19, 47F
推
04/02 09:22, , 48F
04/02 09:22, 48F
→
04/02 14:04, , 49F
04/02 14:04, 49F
推
04/02 17:55, , 50F
04/02 17:55, 50F
推
04/02 19:51, , 51F
04/02 19:51, 51F
→
04/02 22:24, , 52F
04/02 22:24, 52F
推
04/08 19:44, , 53F
04/08 19:44, 53F
推
10/03 11:39, , 54F
10/03 11:39, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):