[討論] 念獸?具現化系vs放出系
很久以前就想問這個問題了,放出系跟具現化系處在相對位置,
也就是說,就像是強化對面是特質一樣,要習得相對位置的系別,效率是最差的。
然就念獸方面,卻時常有所混淆,而念獸應該是這兩系的拿手把戲?!
爬文看了一下有關磊札的能力,大部分人的解釋都以百式觀音來當作例子
顯示有強大氣的念能力者,其他系別也可以有相當程度的念力。
可是這樣不是很奇怪?為什麼要選擇自己比較薄弱的環節來當作武器?
還以"磊札與十四名惡魔"著稱,而不是以"磊札與他的超彈力念彈"著稱?
這一定是他所擅長,他才會以此作為賣點。
因此有人說了,磊札的念獸,應該是放出系的的表現無誤,
你看他十四名惡魔不夠精緻喔!
但是這很奇怪,另一個念能力者,所到廣大鄉民所崇拜的→果列奴
他的能力,我覺得是接近磊札的。你看~他的念獸一樣的不精緻(我無意冒犯猩猩)
而且他的念獸具有"瞬間移動"的性質~應該是屬放出系才對,這在G.I的擂台賽
已經有顯示過了,瞬間移動是歸類在放出系這邊。
可是爬文有許多人認為他是屬具現化系,因為瞬間移動是具現化物所附屬的特殊能力。
這樣一解釋,其實也說的通˙_˙
不過這樣一來~平平是念獸卻有天壤之別呀~~
相同的狀況,在某論壇也有發生。
是有關爭論某個會吃人的念魚到底是放出還是具現化?
"因為他會吃人,而且吃人的時候,被害人感覺不到疼痛,
這明顯是具現化附加的特殊能力"
"念魚看起來只是實體化不完全的念塊(念獸),配合特殊條件可以達到特殊的效果
應該是放出系才對"
兩個明顯在對面的系別,卻時常有爭論,都是因為萬惡的念獸。
到底要如何區分?以往我以為聰明的具現化能力者應該是不會具現化出活體來作為武器
因為你具現化出"活體",你還要去操作它,但是操作系,並不在具現化系隔壁~
因此在操作方面,有一定的難度。
所以具現化系一般要戰鬥的話,最常見的方式就是具現化出武器!!
而放出系為什麼要以"念獸"來作為武器?因為它就在操作系的旁邊
比起具現化系,它可以發揮80%操作的念力,因此在操作念獸方面,
會比具現化系容易許多,所以念獸不用太精緻,能用就好。
會有具現化系已具現化出活體(念獸)來戰鬥,我想就是從華石鬥郎開始的
不過他已經死了~_~
是說,如果放出系在具現化系隔壁,就不會有這些問題了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.41.154.245
推
02/11 12:35, , 1F
02/11 12:35, 1F
→
02/11 13:23, , 2F
02/11 13:23, 2F
→
02/11 13:24, , 3F
02/11 13:24, 3F
→
02/11 13:27, , 4F
02/11 13:27, 4F
→
02/11 13:40, , 5F
02/11 13:40, 5F
推
02/11 13:55, , 6F
02/11 13:55, 6F
→
02/11 13:58, , 7F
02/11 13:58, 7F
→
02/11 14:02, , 8F
02/11 14:02, 8F
推
02/11 14:05, , 9F
02/11 14:05, 9F
→
02/11 14:06, , 10F
02/11 14:06, 10F
→
02/11 14:08, , 11F
02/11 14:08, 11F
推
02/11 14:11, , 12F
02/11 14:11, 12F
→
02/11 14:12, , 13F
02/11 14:12, 13F
→
02/11 14:12, , 14F
02/11 14:12, 14F
→
02/11 14:13, , 15F
02/11 14:13, 15F
→
02/11 14:13, , 16F
02/11 14:13, 16F
→
02/11 14:14, , 17F
02/11 14:14, 17F
→
02/11 14:15, , 18F
02/11 14:15, 18F
→
02/11 14:16, , 19F
02/11 14:16, 19F
→
02/11 14:17, , 20F
02/11 14:17, 20F
推
02/11 14:17, , 21F
02/11 14:17, 21F
→
02/11 14:17, , 22F
02/11 14:17, 22F
→
02/11 14:18, , 23F
02/11 14:18, 23F
→
02/11 14:19, , 24F
02/11 14:19, 24F
→
02/11 14:20, , 25F
02/11 14:20, 25F
→
02/11 14:21, , 26F
02/11 14:21, 26F
→
02/11 14:21, , 27F
02/11 14:21, 27F
推
02/11 14:24, , 28F
02/11 14:24, 28F
→
02/11 14:26, , 29F
02/11 14:26, 29F
→
02/11 14:26, , 30F
02/11 14:26, 30F
→
02/11 14:27, , 31F
02/11 14:27, 31F
→
02/11 14:28, , 32F
02/11 14:28, 32F
→
02/11 14:29, , 33F
02/11 14:29, 33F
→
02/11 14:30, , 34F
02/11 14:30, 34F
→
02/11 14:30, , 35F
02/11 14:30, 35F
→
02/11 14:30, , 36F
02/11 14:30, 36F
→
02/11 14:31, , 37F
02/11 14:31, 37F
→
02/11 14:32, , 38F
02/11 14:32, 38F
→
02/11 14:32, , 39F
02/11 14:32, 39F
→
02/11 14:33, , 40F
02/11 14:33, 40F
推
02/11 14:39, , 41F
02/11 14:39, 41F
→
02/11 14:40, , 42F
02/11 14:40, 42F
→
02/11 14:41, , 43F
02/11 14:41, 43F
→
02/11 14:46, , 44F
02/11 14:46, 44F
→
02/11 14:46, , 45F
02/11 14:46, 45F
→
02/11 15:20, , 46F
02/11 15:20, 46F
推
02/11 16:36, , 47F
02/11 16:36, 47F
→
02/11 16:36, , 48F
02/11 16:36, 48F
→
02/11 16:37, , 49F
02/11 16:37, 49F
推
02/11 16:41, , 50F
02/11 16:41, 50F
推
02/11 17:24, , 51F
02/11 17:24, 51F
→
02/11 17:33, , 52F
02/11 17:33, 52F
→
02/11 17:34, , 53F
02/11 17:34, 53F
推
02/11 17:56, , 54F
02/11 17:56, 54F
→
02/11 17:57, , 55F
02/11 17:57, 55F
→
02/11 18:00, , 56F
02/11 18:00, 56F
→
02/11 18:08, , 57F
02/11 18:08, 57F
→
02/11 18:10, , 58F
02/11 18:10, 58F
推
02/11 18:18, , 59F
02/11 18:18, 59F
→
02/11 18:23, , 60F
02/11 18:23, 60F
→
02/11 19:30, , 61F
02/11 19:30, 61F
→
02/11 21:19, , 62F
02/11 21:19, 62F
推
02/12 00:30, , 63F
02/12 00:30, 63F
推
02/12 01:06, , 64F
02/12 01:06, 64F
→
02/12 01:07, , 65F
02/12 01:07, 65F
→
02/12 10:14, , 66F
02/12 10:14, 66F
推
02/12 17:53, , 67F
02/12 17:53, 67F
→
02/12 17:53, , 68F
02/12 17:53, 68F
→
02/12 17:54, , 69F
02/12 17:54, 69F
→
02/12 20:22, , 70F
02/12 20:22, 70F
→
02/12 20:23, , 71F
02/12 20:23, 71F
→
02/12 21:55, , 72F
02/12 21:55, 72F
→
02/12 21:57, , 73F
02/12 21:57, 73F
→
02/12 22:16, , 74F
02/12 22:16, 74F
→
02/12 22:17, , 75F
02/12 22:17, 75F
→
02/12 22:17, , 76F
02/12 22:17, 76F
→
02/12 23:45, , 77F
02/12 23:45, 77F
→
02/12 23:50, , 78F
02/12 23:50, 78F
→
02/12 23:52, , 79F
02/12 23:52, 79F
→
02/13 00:36, , 80F
02/13 00:36, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):
討論
15
80