[討論] 如果X戰警是念能力者的話.....
金鋼狼
變種能力:超強再生力 骨爪
念能力:強化系
獨眼龍
變種能力:從眼睛發射雷射
念能力:放出系
琴葛雷
變種能力:念動力 心靈控制
念能力:操作系
風暴女
變種能力:操縱天氣
念能力:操作系
X教授
變種能力:心靈控制
念能力:操作系
萬磁王
變種能力:控制金屬
念能力:操作系
為什麼X戰警裡面那些靠杯強的角色
幾乎都是操作系
反觀獵人 操作系幾乎都蠻廢的
除了俠客伊爾咪和柯特還算強(科科男這種破格就不要算了)
芭蕉(鬼隱)
費潔(爆頭)
智喜(據稱比小麥還弱)
為什麼獵人中幾乎沒看到超強的操作系呢
感覺這個系其實很強阿
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.32.245.49
推
11/12 13:09, , 1F
11/12 13:09, 1F
推
11/12 13:11, , 2F
11/12 13:11, 2F
推
11/12 13:16, , 3F
11/12 13:16, 3F
→
11/12 13:16, , 4F
11/12 13:16, 4F
→
11/12 13:17, , 5F
11/12 13:17, 5F
→
11/12 13:19, , 6F
11/12 13:19, 6F
推
11/12 13:24, , 7F
11/12 13:24, 7F
推
11/12 13:26, , 8F
11/12 13:26, 8F
推
11/12 13:28, , 9F
11/12 13:28, 9F
推
11/12 13:32, , 10F
11/12 13:32, 10F
推
11/12 13:32, , 11F
11/12 13:32, 11F
→
11/12 13:34, , 12F
11/12 13:34, 12F
推
11/12 13:36, , 13F
11/12 13:36, 13F
推
11/12 14:10, , 14F
11/12 14:10, 14F
推
11/12 14:10, , 15F
11/12 14:10, 15F
推
11/12 14:13, , 16F
11/12 14:13, 16F
→
11/12 14:13, , 17F
11/12 14:13, 17F
推
11/12 14:27, , 18F
11/12 14:27, 18F
推
11/12 14:28, , 19F
11/12 14:28, 19F
→
11/12 14:28, , 20F
11/12 14:28, 20F
推
11/12 14:29, , 21F
11/12 14:29, 21F
推
11/12 14:54, , 22F
11/12 14:54, 22F
推
11/12 15:00, , 23F
11/12 15:00, 23F
推
11/12 15:04, , 24F
11/12 15:04, 24F
→
11/12 15:05, , 25F
11/12 15:05, 25F
→
11/12 15:05, , 26F
11/12 15:05, 26F
→
11/12 15:06, , 27F
11/12 15:06, 27F
→
11/12 15:06, , 28F
11/12 15:06, 28F
→
11/12 15:07, , 29F
11/12 15:07, 29F
→
11/12 15:29, , 30F
11/12 15:29, 30F
推
11/12 15:33, , 31F
11/12 15:33, 31F
推
11/12 15:35, , 32F
11/12 15:35, 32F
推
11/12 15:38, , 33F
11/12 15:38, 33F
→
11/12 15:40, , 34F
11/12 15:40, 34F
推
11/12 16:26, , 35F
11/12 16:26, 35F
→
11/12 16:53, , 36F
11/12 16:53, 36F
推
11/12 17:18, , 37F
11/12 17:18, 37F
→
11/12 17:19, , 38F
11/12 17:19, 38F
→
11/12 18:56, , 39F
11/12 18:56, 39F
推
11/12 19:10, , 40F
11/12 19:10, 40F
→
11/12 19:24, , 41F
11/12 19:24, 41F
→
11/12 19:25, , 42F
11/12 19:25, 42F
推
11/12 19:35, , 43F
11/12 19:35, 43F
推
11/12 19:49, , 44F
11/12 19:49, 44F
→
11/12 20:11, , 45F
11/12 20:11, 45F
推
11/12 21:40, , 46F
11/12 21:40, 46F
推
11/12 22:01, , 47F
11/12 22:01, 47F
→
11/12 22:03, , 48F
11/12 22:03, 48F
推
11/12 22:14, , 49F
11/12 22:14, 49F
推
11/12 22:29, , 50F
11/12 22:29, 50F
推
11/12 22:30, , 51F
11/12 22:30, 51F
推
11/12 22:46, , 52F
11/12 22:46, 52F
→
11/12 22:46, , 53F
11/12 22:46, 53F
推
11/12 22:47, , 54F
11/12 22:47, 54F
推
11/12 23:26, , 55F
11/12 23:26, 55F
推
11/12 23:39, , 56F
11/12 23:39, 56F
推
11/13 04:59, , 57F
11/13 04:59, 57F
推
11/13 10:31, , 58F
11/13 10:31, 58F
→
11/13 10:33, , 59F
11/13 10:33, 59F
→
11/13 10:34, , 60F
11/13 10:34, 60F
→
11/13 20:12, , 61F
11/13 20:12, 61F
→
11/13 23:23, , 62F
11/13 23:23, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):