[新聞] 台智光案「民進黨不是無辜的」 柯文哲怒轟:查出來你們人不會比較少
台智光案「民進黨不是無辜的」 柯文哲怒轟:查出來你們人不會比較少
https://tw.nextapple.com/politics/20240329/3A4B9CCB2DD8DBC07561A175DD65BFA5
壹蘋
台智光案持續延燒,不僅台北市三任市長郝龍斌、柯文哲、蔣萬安被捲入,連藍綠白北市議
員也被扯入。民進黨議會黨團總召簡舒培爆料,民眾黨北市4個議員跟台智光相關人員吃飯
,過從甚密;另外也質疑台智光案為何忍耐8年不說。民眾黨主席柯文哲則怒斥,當初但書
跟否決覆議都是藍綠聯手,民進黨不是無辜的,怎麼現在卻變成正義使者,要民進黨別多講
話,「查出來你們人不會比較少。」
柯文哲今出席民眾黨青年部亮相記者會,針對簡書培爆料民眾黨4位議員跟台智光相關人員
吃飯,他痛斥最討厭穿鑿附會、含血噴人,他最近才跟蔡英文吃過飯,所以呢?要不要查查
看,民進黨跟台智光吃飯有多少?
柯文哲怒轟,這時候民進黨不要再多講話,查出來你們人不會比較少,當初提出但書的是國
民黨加民進黨,否決他複議的也是國民黨加民進黨,民進黨不是無辜的,怎麼現在變成正義
使者?
心得:
民進黨就是綠共啊!
自己多少人跟台智光吃飯怎麼還有臉指責民眾黨?
一副事不關己的樣子,
一手念經、一手摸奶。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.200.136.186 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1711703963.A.01A.html
噓
03/29 17:19,
4周前
, 1F
03/29 17:19, 1F
→
03/29 17:19,
4周前
, 2F
03/29 17:19, 2F
推
03/29 17:20,
4周前
, 3F
03/29 17:20, 3F
→
03/29 17:20,
4周前
, 4F
03/29 17:20, 4F
推
03/29 17:20,
4周前
, 5F
03/29 17:20, 5F
→
03/29 17:20,
4周前
, 6F
03/29 17:20, 6F
→
03/29 17:20,
4周前
, 7F
03/29 17:20, 7F
推
03/29 17:21,
4周前
, 8F
03/29 17:21, 8F
推
03/29 17:21,
4周前
, 9F
03/29 17:21, 9F
噓
03/29 17:21,
4周前
, 10F
03/29 17:21, 10F
推
03/29 17:21,
4周前
, 11F
03/29 17:21, 11F
推
03/29 17:22,
4周前
, 12F
03/29 17:22, 12F
推
03/29 17:22,
4周前
, 13F
03/29 17:22, 13F
→
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 14F
03/29 17:23, 14F
→
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 15F
03/29 17:23, 15F
推
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 16F
03/29 17:23, 16F
推
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 17F
03/29 17:23, 17F
噓
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 18F
03/29 17:23, 18F
→
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 19F
03/29 17:23, 19F
→
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 20F
03/29 17:23, 20F
→
03/29 17:23,
4周前
, 21F
03/29 17:23, 21F
推
03/29 17:24,
4周前
, 22F
03/29 17:24, 22F
推
03/29 17:24,
4周前
, 23F
03/29 17:24, 23F
→
03/29 17:24,
4周前
, 24F
03/29 17:24, 24F
→
03/29 17:24,
4周前
, 25F
03/29 17:24, 25F
→
03/29 17:24,
4周前
, 26F
03/29 17:24, 26F
→
03/29 17:24,
4周前
, 27F
03/29 17:24, 27F
噓
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 28F
03/29 17:25, 28F
→
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 29F
03/29 17:25, 29F
噓
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 30F
03/29 17:25, 30F
→
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 31F
03/29 17:25, 31F
→
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 32F
03/29 17:25, 32F
噓
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 33F
03/29 17:25, 33F
→
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 34F
03/29 17:25, 34F
推
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 35F
03/29 17:25, 35F
→
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 36F
03/29 17:25, 36F
→
03/29 17:25,
4周前
, 37F
03/29 17:25, 37F
→
03/29 17:26,
4周前
, 38F
03/29 17:26, 38F
推
03/29 17:26,
4周前
, 39F
03/29 17:26, 39F
還有 107 則推文
→
03/29 18:57,
4周前
, 147F
03/29 18:57, 147F
→
03/29 18:57,
4周前
, 148F
03/29 18:57, 148F
→
03/29 18:57,
4周前
, 149F
03/29 18:57, 149F
→
03/29 18:57,
4周前
, 150F
03/29 18:57, 150F
→
03/29 18:58,
4周前
, 151F
03/29 18:58, 151F
推
03/29 19:02,
4周前
, 152F
03/29 19:02, 152F
→
03/29 19:02,
4周前
, 153F
03/29 19:02, 153F
→
03/29 19:02,
4周前
, 154F
03/29 19:02, 154F
→
03/29 19:06,
4周前
, 155F
03/29 19:06, 155F
→
03/29 19:06,
4周前
, 156F
03/29 19:06, 156F
推
03/29 19:08,
4周前
, 157F
03/29 19:08, 157F
→
03/29 19:08,
4周前
, 158F
03/29 19:08, 158F
→
03/29 19:10,
4周前
, 159F
03/29 19:10, 159F
推
03/29 19:17,
4周前
, 160F
03/29 19:17, 160F
噓
03/29 19:18,
4周前
, 161F
03/29 19:18, 161F
推
03/29 19:25,
4周前
, 162F
03/29 19:25, 162F
噓
03/29 19:28,
4周前
, 163F
03/29 19:28, 163F
推
03/29 19:31,
4周前
, 164F
03/29 19:31, 164F
→
03/29 19:31,
4周前
, 165F
03/29 19:31, 165F
噓
03/29 19:50,
4周前
, 166F
03/29 19:50, 166F
噓
03/29 19:55,
4周前
, 167F
03/29 19:55, 167F
噓
03/29 20:12,
4周前
, 168F
03/29 20:12, 168F
→
03/29 20:12,
4周前
, 169F
03/29 20:12, 169F
→
03/29 20:21,
4周前
, 170F
03/29 20:21, 170F
推
03/29 21:00,
4周前
, 171F
03/29 21:00, 171F
→
03/29 21:01,
4周前
, 172F
03/29 21:01, 172F
→
03/29 21:01,
4周前
, 173F
03/29 21:01, 173F
→
03/29 21:05,
4周前
, 174F
03/29 21:05, 174F
噓
03/29 21:33,
4周前
, 175F
03/29 21:33, 175F
噓
03/29 21:43,
4周前
, 176F
03/29 21:43, 176F
噓
03/29 21:45,
4周前
, 177F
03/29 21:45, 177F
→
03/29 21:46,
4周前
, 178F
03/29 21:46, 178F
噓
03/29 23:58,
4周前
, 179F
03/29 23:58, 179F
噓
03/30 00:20,
4周前
, 180F
03/30 00:20, 180F
噓
03/30 01:48,
4周前
, 181F
03/30 01:48, 181F
→
03/30 01:48,
4周前
, 182F
03/30 01:48, 182F
→
03/30 02:43,
4周前
, 183F
03/30 02:43, 183F
→
03/30 03:29,
4周前
, 184F
03/30 03:29, 184F
→
03/30 05:30,
4周前
, 185F
03/30 05:30, 185F
噓
03/30 09:48,
4周前
, 186F
03/30 09:48, 186F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):