[討論] KMT願意改革什麼議題,大家才會考慮投票?消失
完整一點說,台灣還有很多重大議題需要重新檢討,
討厭KMT的選民們,有什麼政策是KMT提出來,而且在未來真的認真推行
下次大選會重新考慮投給他們?
個人覺得健保制度已經到了該大刀闊斧去處理的地步
包括落實轉診制度、家醫制度、健保給付方式等等
如果KMT保證改善這部分
那捏著鼻子投票也不是不能考慮
大家認為還有哪些議題也是如此呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.25.5.51
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1498891345.A.AFC.html
推
07/01 14:43, , 1F
07/01 14:43, 1F
→
07/01 14:43, , 2F
07/01 14:43, 2F
→
07/01 14:43, , 3F
07/01 14:43, 3F
可能沒表達清楚,我知道KMT的改革決心向來讓人擔憂
所以應該這樣說,有什麼已經議題重要到,不管哪個政黨來做你都願意支持的地步
※ 編輯: piggyman (114.25.5.51), 07/01/2017 14:46:14
→
07/01 14:44, , 4F
07/01 14:44, 4F
→
07/01 14:44, , 5F
07/01 14:44, 5F
→
07/01 14:48, , 6F
07/01 14:48, 6F
噓
07/01 14:48, , 7F
07/01 14:48, 7F
推
07/01 14:48, , 8F
07/01 14:48, 8F
推
07/01 14:52, , 9F
07/01 14:52, 9F
推
07/01 14:58, , 10F
07/01 14:58, 10F
推
07/01 14:59, , 11F
07/01 14:59, 11F
→
07/01 14:59, , 12F
07/01 14:59, 12F
→
07/01 15:02, , 13F
07/01 15:02, 13F
→
07/01 15:02, , 14F
07/01 15:02, 14F
推
07/01 15:03, , 15F
07/01 15:03, 15F
→
07/01 15:03, , 16F
07/01 15:03, 16F
→
07/01 15:03, , 17F
07/01 15:03, 17F
推
07/01 15:04, , 18F
07/01 15:04, 18F
→
07/01 15:06, , 19F
07/01 15:06, 19F
→
07/01 15:06, , 20F
07/01 15:06, 20F
→
07/01 15:06, , 21F
07/01 15:06, 21F
推
07/01 15:06, , 22F
07/01 15:06, 22F
→
07/01 15:06, , 23F
07/01 15:06, 23F
→
07/01 15:06, , 24F
07/01 15:06, 24F
推
07/01 15:15, , 25F
07/01 15:15, 25F
→
07/01 15:17, , 26F
07/01 15:17, 26F
推
07/01 15:23, , 27F
07/01 15:23, 27F
→
07/01 15:23, , 28F
07/01 15:23, 28F
→
07/01 15:24, , 29F
07/01 15:24, 29F
推
07/01 15:24, , 30F
07/01 15:24, 30F
推
07/01 15:26, , 31F
07/01 15:26, 31F
推
07/01 15:27, , 32F
07/01 15:27, 32F
→
07/01 15:28, , 33F
07/01 15:28, 33F
推
07/01 15:28, , 34F
07/01 15:28, 34F
→
07/01 15:28, , 35F
07/01 15:28, 35F
→
07/01 15:28, , 36F
07/01 15:28, 36F
推
07/01 15:31, , 37F
07/01 15:31, 37F
推
07/01 15:31, , 38F
07/01 15:31, 38F
→
07/01 15:31, , 39F
07/01 15:31, 39F
→
07/01 15:33, , 40F
07/01 15:33, 40F
推
07/01 15:34, , 41F
07/01 15:34, 41F
→
07/01 15:37, , 42F
07/01 15:37, 42F
→
07/01 15:38, , 43F
07/01 15:38, 43F
噓
07/01 15:39, , 44F
07/01 15:39, 44F
→
07/01 15:41, , 45F
07/01 15:41, 45F
→
07/01 15:52, , 46F
07/01 15:52, 46F
→
07/01 15:53, , 47F
07/01 15:53, 47F
→
07/01 15:53, , 48F
07/01 15:53, 48F
→
07/01 15:58, , 49F
07/01 15:58, 49F
推
07/01 15:59, , 50F
07/01 15:59, 50F
→
07/01 18:07, , 51F
07/01 18:07, 51F
推
07/01 18:33, , 52F
07/01 18:33, 52F
推
07/01 19:00, , 53F
07/01 19:00, 53F
推
07/01 19:21, , 54F
07/01 19:21, 54F
噓
07/01 20:29, , 55F
07/01 20:29, 55F
→
07/01 20:38, , 56F
07/01 20:38, 56F
推
07/01 22:36, , 57F
07/01 22:36, 57F
推
07/01 23:00, , 58F
07/01 23:00, 58F
→
07/01 23:40, , 59F
07/01 23:40, 59F
→
07/02 07:04, , 60F
07/02 07:04, 60F
→
07/02 13:28, , 61F
07/02 13:28, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):