[討論] 明年2018 國民黨應該很難收復桃園 ...消失
這幾天 過年期間 我有去廟裡拜拜
想說奇怪 怎麼廟前一堆人在排隊 ? 而且不是什麼廟會的活動
後來我稍微問一下 才知道是鄭文燦 跑來發紅包
http://i.imgur.com/8d3bMca.jpg
![](https://i.imgur.com/8d3bMca.jpg)
聽說是只發一塊錢的紅包 但是我看到的情況是廟前一堆阿公阿嬤
中年人 在那邊排隊 以桃園這種地方 不管哪個政治人物來通常都是冷冷清清的
但是這次 我看到的排隊人潮 真的是還蠻多 蠻嚇人的
以往朱立倫或者吳志揚很少會安排這種新春發紅包的活動
我覺得明年2018 桃園市 應該還是鄭文燦穩連任...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.173.119
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1485947168.A.DFF.html
推
02/01 19:12, , 1F
02/01 19:12, 1F
推
02/01 19:14, , 2F
02/01 19:14, 2F
推
02/01 19:15, , 3F
02/01 19:15, 3F
→
02/01 19:15, , 4F
02/01 19:15, 4F
→
02/01 19:15, , 5F
02/01 19:15, 5F
→
02/01 19:16, , 6F
02/01 19:16, 6F
→
02/01 19:19, , 7F
02/01 19:19, 7F
→
02/01 19:19, , 8F
02/01 19:19, 8F
→
02/01 19:20, , 9F
02/01 19:20, 9F
→
02/01 19:21, , 10F
02/01 19:21, 10F
推
02/01 19:24, , 11F
02/01 19:24, 11F
推
02/01 19:24, , 12F
02/01 19:24, 12F
→
02/01 19:24, , 13F
02/01 19:24, 13F
→
02/01 19:24, , 14F
02/01 19:24, 14F
推
02/01 19:25, , 15F
02/01 19:25, 15F
→
02/01 19:25, , 16F
02/01 19:25, 16F
→
02/01 19:25, , 17F
02/01 19:25, 17F
→
02/01 19:25, , 18F
02/01 19:25, 18F
推
02/01 19:27, , 19F
02/01 19:27, 19F
→
02/01 19:27, , 20F
02/01 19:27, 20F
推
02/01 19:28, , 21F
02/01 19:28, 21F
→
02/01 19:28, , 22F
02/01 19:28, 22F
→
02/01 19:28, , 23F
02/01 19:28, 23F
→
02/01 19:29, , 24F
02/01 19:29, 24F
→
02/01 19:29, , 25F
02/01 19:29, 25F
→
02/01 19:31, , 26F
02/01 19:31, 26F
推
02/01 19:34, , 27F
02/01 19:34, 27F
推
02/01 19:34, , 28F
02/01 19:34, 28F
→
02/01 19:38, , 29F
02/01 19:38, 29F
推
02/01 19:46, , 30F
02/01 19:46, 30F
→
02/01 19:46, , 31F
02/01 19:46, 31F
推
02/01 20:15, , 32F
02/01 20:15, 32F
推
02/01 20:27, , 33F
02/01 20:27, 33F
推
02/01 20:30, , 34F
02/01 20:30, 34F
推
02/01 20:31, , 35F
02/01 20:31, 35F
推
02/01 20:32, , 36F
02/01 20:32, 36F
推
02/01 20:33, , 37F
02/01 20:33, 37F
推
02/01 20:34, , 38F
02/01 20:34, 38F
→
02/01 20:35, , 39F
02/01 20:35, 39F
→
02/01 20:35, , 40F
02/01 20:35, 40F
→
02/01 20:36, , 41F
02/01 20:36, 41F
推
02/01 20:37, , 42F
02/01 20:37, 42F
推
02/01 20:46, , 43F
02/01 20:46, 43F
→
02/01 20:47, , 44F
02/01 20:47, 44F
推
02/01 20:47, , 45F
02/01 20:47, 45F
推
02/01 20:48, , 46F
02/01 20:48, 46F
→
02/01 20:49, , 47F
02/01 20:49, 47F
→
02/01 20:50, , 48F
02/01 20:50, 48F
→
02/01 20:50, , 49F
02/01 20:50, 49F
推
02/01 20:52, , 50F
02/01 20:52, 50F
→
02/01 20:52, , 51F
02/01 20:52, 51F
推
02/01 21:18, , 52F
02/01 21:18, 52F
推
02/01 21:19, , 53F
02/01 21:19, 53F
→
02/01 21:26, , 54F
02/01 21:26, 54F
噓
02/01 21:30, , 55F
02/01 21:30, 55F
推
02/01 21:37, , 56F
02/01 21:37, 56F
→
02/01 21:47, , 57F
02/01 21:47, 57F
推
02/01 22:34, , 58F
02/01 22:34, 58F
推
02/02 00:28, , 59F
02/02 00:28, 59F
推
02/02 02:32, , 60F
02/02 02:32, 60F
推
02/02 02:52, , 61F
02/02 02:52, 61F
推
02/02 10:56, , 62F
02/02 10:56, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):