Re: [爆卦] 衛報: 拒絕上海復星的BNT疫苗完全是政治考量已回收

看板Gossiping作者FBMaster (FB 大師)時間4年前 (2021/06/14 23:52)推噓5(5推 0噓 3→)

留言8則, 7人參與討論串4/4 (看更多)

看到幾個地方翻譯不太對，我幫你修正一下 : “You’re not supporting Taiwan just to antagonise China, and that gets lost : a lot in these conversations.” : “你(YOU我猜是美日)不要支持台灣去對抗(antagonize)中國,會使美日兩國遭受損失” : (and that gets lost a lot in these conversations.) Get lost a lot 這邊正確的翻譯是說前面這句在很多討論中很多人沒搞清楚正確翻譯是 - 美日不會只是為了搞中國而支持台灣，這是在很多討論裡面沒被注意到的環節 : Thompson said there were scientific and transparency concerns about China’s : vaccines, which made it unsurprising and potentially sensible for Taiwan to : reject an offer of Chinese-developed vaccines. But if the Fosun offer is : legitimate, refusing it is “entirely political”. : Thompson說中國疫苗或許有科學及不透明的問題,因為各種因素加乘,使台灣人拒絕中國開 : 發的疫苗,可是上海復興(Fosun)提供的是合法的(legitimate),拒絕上海復興是完全”政 : 治考量” But if the Fosun 這邊你的翻譯也是錯的正確翻譯 - 如果復星真的有提出要賣的提議的話，拒絕這個提議可以說是完全政治考量。 : “Pfizer and BioNTech have a huge incentive to ensure that the Fosun product : is equivalent, so I would think there is no concern,” he said. “There’s no : reason not to take it.” : “輝瑞(Pfizer)/BioNTech已經保證上海復興賣的疫苗是可靠的,我相這不是問題”他說, : ”真的沒有理由拒絕上海復興賣的疫苗” 正確翻譯 - 輝瑞(Pfizer)/BioNTech 有很大的利益動機來確保復星的產品是同樣的 : Polling has shown Taiwanese people are largely opposed to receiving a : Chinese-made vaccine, but not necessarily to a foreign vaccine produced in : China, like the Fosun/BioNtech one. : 民調顯示台灣人是很反對中國製造的疫苗,可是不需要去反對外國廠商在中國生產的疫苗, : 像Fosun/BioNtech one. 正確翻譯 - 民調顯示台灣人大部分反對中國製造的疫苗，但未必反對一個在中國製造的外國疫苗 : Before the current outbreak in Taiwan, so few members of priority groups were : booking shots that authorities briefly opened vaccination up to the general : population. But now community appetite is bigger than available supplies. : 台灣疫情爆發以前,像醫護等優先族群已經接種疫苗,政府也開放民間施打,可是現在疫苗 : 數量已無法滿足民間正確翻譯 - 疫情爆發之前，優先族群其實沒有很踴躍想打疫苗，所以一度開放自費給所有人打。 : On Thursday, Chen said Taiwan had held talks with AstraZeneca to produce its : vaccine but that the talks had fallen through. He previously said Taiwan was : in talks with US companies about making their vaccines, though he did not : name them. : 在星期四,陳時中說台灣已經跟AZ洽談,可是失敗(fallen through),他先前說台灣已經和 : 美國疫苗廠洽詢疫苗,雖然他沒指名道姓這裡前後都漏掉代工生產的部分 : The opposition Kuomintang party and several politicians at the local county : level have sought to capitalise on the vaccine difficulties, leading to : political slanging matches. But Lev Nachman, a visiting scholar at the : National Taiwan University, said it still seemed “in the DPP’s electoral : interest not to get any China vaccines”. : 國民黨跟所屬地方縣長則尋求向外購置(capitalize)各種疫苗,使台灣政治更為混亂 : (slanging matches),可是Lev Nachman,一個台大的訪問學者,他說”民進黨根本不想要任 : 何跟中國有關疫苗” 正確翻譯 - 國民黨與與部分地方縣市長則想要透過這個疫苗困境獲取政治利益..... capitalize 在這邊不是購置好嗎.... 學者的說法是 - 似乎不從中國取得疫苗，是比較符合民進黨的選舉利益的 : “It would be foolish to say no, but it would be a measure of last resort,” : Nachman said. : “或許他們會很愚蠢的說NO,可是這將是最後可用手段”. Nachman說他們不會傻到說不，但這只有在最後關頭才會用上 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.229.251.57 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1623685973.A.FC2.html

推

AlHorford15

06/14 23:55, 4年前 , 1^F

06/14 23:55, 1^F

推

polestar0505

06/14 23:55, 4年前 , 2^F

06/14 23:55, 2^F

推

u831208

06/14 23:56, 4年前 , 3^F

06/14 23:56, 3^F