Re: [問卦] 美國最大新聞台fox報導拜登得票於系統bug已回收
Michigan state 官方回覆
簡而言之就是人工疏失,並不影響正式選票計算。
出處
https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127--544676--,00.html
原文如下,大略翻譯
False claims from Ronna McDaniel have no merit
NOVEMBER 6, 2020
In response to the false claims made by Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, the Michigan Department of State issues the following statements of fact:
Michigan’s elections were conducted fairly, effectively and transparently and are an accurate reflection of the will of Michigan voters.
The erroneous reporting of unofficial results from Antrim county was a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk. The equipment and software did not malfunction and all ballots were properly tabulated. However, the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results.
計算選票的機器跟軟體並無問題,但是用來收集選票資料與非正式統計的報表軟體應故未更新。
Like many counties in Michigan, Antrim County uses the Dominion Voting Systems election management system and voting machines (ballot tabulators.) The county receives programming support from Election Source. Tabulators are programmed to scan hand marked, paper ballots. When machines are finished scanning the ballots, the paper ballots are retained and a totals tape showing the number of votes for each candidate in each race is printed from the machine.
In order to report unofficial results, county clerks use election management system software to combine the electronic totals from tabulators and submit a report of unofficial results. Because the clerk did not update software, even though the tabulators counted all the ballots correctly, those accurate results were not combined properly when the clerk reported unofficial results.
雖然計票正確,但由於該選舉管理軟體未更新而造成統整非正式資料時出錯。
The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct.
計票結果一直無誤,即便一開始並未發現非正式資料結果出錯,此結果會再經過2名民主黨與2名共和黨成員核對是否無誤。
The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canvasses.
It is also completely false that the county had to or will have to hand count all their ballots. The ballots were properly counted by the tabulators. The county had to review the printed tabulator results from each precinct, not each individual ballot.
As with other unofficial results reporting errors, this was an honest mistake and did not affect any actual vote totals. Election clerks work extremely hard and do their work with integrity. They are human beings, and sometimes make mistakes. However, there are many checks and balances that ensure mistakes can be caught and corrected.
簡而言之,這次過失並未影響正式選票統計,而且這錯誤也在審核選票時修正。
As Detroit officials have stated, hundreds of challengers from both parties were inside their absent voter counting board all afternoon and evening. And even after some left, there were always challengers from both parties in the room. Dozens of reporters were in the room as well. Further, some windows were covered to stop those outside from filming the people and private information in the counting board, while other windows were left uncovered to ensure additional transparency.
這邊只是說計票的過程並非完全不公開。
As was stated by Chris Thomas, who as a contractor for the Detroit City Clerk’s Office served as an advisor on the execution of this election and led challenger relations, and who is the former Michigan Director of Elections, who served under both republican and democrat Secretaries of State during his 40-year-tenure with the Bureau of Elections, no ballots were backdated. Rather, a clerical error was made when some ballot envelopes were received in Detroit satellite offices. Although employees stamped
a date of receipt on the envelopes, an employee failed to complete the transaction for receiving the ballot by saving that date in the Qualified Voter File. Therefore, at the absent voter counting board, after discussion with Republican challengers who chose not to challenge the process, staff was instructed to enter that date stamped on the envelope ensuring that no voters were disenfranchised by the clerical error.
這邊在講另外郵寄選票日期的事情,有部分郵寄選票因人為疏失而未將收件日期建檔。後來開會時與共和黨在場人士討論後,決定將這些選票重新輸入日期建檔。
官方回覆,信者恆信。大家看完自己判斷。
-----
Sent from JPTT on my iPad
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 66.41.96.17 (美國)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1604727819.A.84D.html
推
11/07 13:43,
5年前
, 1F
11/07 13:43, 1F
推
11/07 13:44,
5年前
, 2F
11/07 13:44, 2F
→
11/07 13:44,
5年前
, 3F
11/07 13:44, 3F
推
11/07 13:44,
5年前
, 4F
11/07 13:44, 4F
推
11/07 13:45,
5年前
, 5F
11/07 13:45, 5F
噓
11/07 13:45,
5年前
, 6F
11/07 13:45, 6F
噓
11/07 13:46,
5年前
, 7F
11/07 13:46, 7F
推
11/07 13:47,
5年前
, 8F
11/07 13:47, 8F
噓
11/07 13:48,
5年前
, 9F
11/07 13:48, 9F
推
11/07 13:48,
5年前
, 10F
11/07 13:48, 10F
推
11/07 13:48,
5年前
, 11F
11/07 13:48, 11F
推
11/07 13:49,
5年前
, 12F
11/07 13:49, 12F
→
11/07 13:50,
5年前
, 13F
11/07 13:50, 13F
→
11/07 13:50,
5年前
, 14F
11/07 13:50, 14F
→
11/07 13:54,
5年前
, 15F
11/07 13:54, 15F
推
11/07 13:57,
5年前
, 16F
11/07 13:57, 16F
噓
11/07 13:59,
5年前
, 17F
11/07 13:59, 17F
推
11/07 14:14,
5年前
, 18F
11/07 14:14, 18F
推
11/07 14:16,
5年前
, 19F
11/07 14:16, 19F
→
11/07 14:34,
5年前
, 20F
11/07 14:34, 20F
→
11/07 14:37,
5年前
, 21F
11/07 14:37, 21F
推
11/07 14:39,
5年前
, 22F
11/07 14:39, 22F
→
11/07 14:40,
5年前
, 23F
11/07 14:40, 23F
噓
11/07 14:57,
5年前
, 24F
11/07 14:57, 24F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 9 篇):