[新聞] 澳洲報導:劍橋研究人員發現三種病毒株

看板Gossiping作者 (問教授)時間5年前 (2020/04/11 07:16), 5年前編輯推噓3(8521)
留言34則, 16人參與, 5年前最新討論串1/6 (看更多)
※新聞內容含有政治人物、政府機關類、政治族群類請以[政治]為分類,違者刪除! 1.媒體來源: ※ 例如蘋果日報、自由時報(請參考版規下方的核准媒體名單) 澳洲新聞網(news.com.au) 2.記者署名 ※ 沒有在這打上記者署名的新聞會被水桶14天 編輯非記者 ※ 外電至少要有來源或編輯 如:法新社 Victoria Craw 3.完整新聞標題: ※ 標題沒有完整寫出來 ---> 依照板規刪除文章 Coronavirus Australia: Three different strains of virus identified by Cambridge University researchers 澳大利亞冠狀病毒:劍橋大學研究人員鑑定出的三種不同病毒株 4.完整新聞內文: ※ 社論特稿都不能貼!違者刪除(政治類水桶3個月),貼廣告也會被刪除喔!可詳看版規 Researchers have found three distinct strains of COVID-19, with two of them popping up in Australia including one closest to the “root of the outbreak”. April 11, 20206:23am Australians diagnosed with coronavirus could be suffering from one of two different strains of the disease, one of which is a “daughter” to the original strain found in China, new research has found. A study by Cambridge University researchers mapping the “evolutionary path” of the virus as it spread from Wuhan, China found three distinct strains in different parts of the globe. They have been dubbed A, B and C by researchers, based on a study of 160 genomes taken from patients between 24 December and 4 March in a process known as “phylogenetic network analysis” which essentially maps the family tree of COVID-19. Variant A is the “original human virus genome” and is closest to the “root of the outbreak”, researchers believe. It was found in Wuhan and is most similar to the type of virus found in bats. COVID-19 is believed to have originated in horseshoe bats and transferred to humans via an intermediary animal such as a pangolin. The epicentre is thought to be a Wuhan seafood market. Surprisingly however, researchers found the A variant was not Wuhan’s dominant virus type. Instead, mutated versions of A were found in Americans that lived in Wuhan and A-type viruses were also found in patients in Australia and the US. Type B is derived from A and separated by two mutations. This was the main type found in Wuhan city and across East Asia. However it has not been found much beyond East Asia, suggesting a “founder event” in Wuhan or some form of resistance to the strain outside of Asia. Instead, a third virus strain known as C – which is the “daughter” of B – has been found across Europe and is also present in Sydney, according to the virus tree. It is the major variant found in early patients in France, Italy, Spain and the UK. It was absent from China’s sample but also found in Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea. More than 1.5 million people have been infected with COVID-19 around the world and nearly 100,000 have died. The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is yet to be peer-reviewed, however it suggests the first spread of the disease among humans occurred between mid-September and early December. Chinese authorities reported the first case on 31 December. Dr Peter Forster, lead author from the University of Cambridge, said while there are too many mutations of the disease to precisely trace a COVID-19 family tree, the algorithm shows “plausible trees simultaneously.” “These techniques are mostly known for mapping the movements of prehistoric human populations through DNA. We think this is one of the first times they have been used to trace the infection routes of a coronavirus like COVID-19,” he said. Researchers also believe the information could be used to map the source of outbreaks and where they might occur in future. It could even lead to differences in the clinical presentation of the disease and be used to design treatments and vaccines, the team said. Dr Forster said: “The viral network we have detailed is a snapshot of the early stages of an epidemic, before the evolutionary paths of COVID-19 become obscured by vast numbers of mutations. It’s like catching an incipient supernova in the act.” 5.完整新聞連結 (或短網址): ※ 當新聞連結過長時,需提供短網址方便網友點擊 https://reurl.cc/z8Nxee https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/coronavirus-australia-three-different-strains-of-virus-identified-by-cambridge-university-researchers/news-story/e6fbac027ba79eecb95e83aa1df80517 pdf連結 https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2020/04/07/2004999117.full.pdf 6.備註: ※ 一個人一天只能張貼一則新聞,被刪或自刪也算額度內,超貼者水桶,請注意 有趣的新聞 劍橋大學遺傳學家 Peter Forster 利用DNA尋找人類起源的技術 透過160個病例畫出的病毒進化樹 發現武漢病毒目前大致有3型。 研究人員相信病毒起源於武漢 A型最古老 反而在武漢較少 去年9-12月開始傳播 武漢最多的是從A型進化的B型 但令人驚訝的是 研究人員在居住在武漢的美國人中發現了A的突變形式 在澳大利亞和美國的患者中也發現了A型病毒 東亞國家傳的主要是B型 歐洲傳的主要是從B型進化的C型 在中國的樣本中沒有 在香港、新加坡、韓國樣本中有 如果是假新聞、大外宣 也仿真得太厲害了.... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.194.189.235 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1586560600.A.CC1.html *[1;31m*[33mdrkkimo*[m*[33m: 這篇昨天貼過了 想甩鍋病毒來自美國的 怎麼有人一? *[1;31m*[33mJuiFu617*[m*[33m: 到底要貼幾次 *[1;37m*[33mpatiger*[m*[33m: 其實就不外乎是外宣的一環 *[1;31m*[33ma27588679*[m*[33m: 你有何居心? *[1;37m*[33mfulongb210f*[m*[33m: 病毒不就是來自中國嗎? 跟風就對了 *[1;37m*[33margine1978*[m*[33m: 中文摘要是否故意漏這一句:A型病毒在武漢發現? *[1;31m*[33margine1978*[m*[33m: 接近蝙蝠病毒者? 加上去了 *[1;31m*[33mbadbadook*[m*[33m: 好屌 *[1;37m*[33mheci1941*[m*[33m: 某樓在說什麼啊? 這可是"牛津大學"的研究耶。你給 *[1;31m*[33mheci1941*[m*[33m: 是大陸的外宣?? 我的錯,第一時間寫錯了 *[1;31m*[33myoshilin*[m*[33m: 所以變異的比較厲害

04/11 07:43, 5年前 , 1F
所以變異的比較厲害
04/11 07:43, 1F

04/11 07:43, 5年前 , 2F
台日韓可能因為不是變異
04/11 07:43, 2F

04/11 07:43, 5年前 , 3F
所以疫情相對溫和
04/11 07:43, 3F

04/11 07:55, 5年前 , 4F
某樓連大學都看錯 這是劍橋
04/11 07:55, 4F

04/11 08:01, 5年前 , 5F
這很好破解啊,中國分離到 A 型病毒株,不提供給 WHO 就
04/11 08:01, 5F

04/11 08:01, 5年前 , 6F
好。
04/11 08:01, 6F

04/11 08:09, 5年前 , 7F
舊聞囉,這篇跟你PO這篇都是XD
04/11 08:09, 7F
檢查了一下時間,應該是新聞無誤

04/11 08:26, 5年前 , 8F
看你的心得寫中國大陸不直接寫中國就知道你的立場了
04/11 08:26, 8F
改了改了,有開心嗎?

04/11 08:26, 5年前 , 9F
所以不就是中國造成大傳播後變異才害死一堆人?
04/11 08:26, 9F

04/11 08:38, 5年前 , 10F
P4實驗室流出 A型就是從武漢地區直接傳播的 中國人直接傳
04/11 08:38, 10F

04/11 08:38, 5年前 , 11F
到美國澳洲 B型是再加強變種過的 同樣由武漢外散 C型是由
04/11 08:38, 11F

04/11 08:38, 5年前 , 12F
解放軍觀光客傳歐洲再擴散全球。
04/11 08:38, 12F

04/11 08:40, 5年前 , 13F
看爆發時間點就知道中國源頭是無法甩鍋的 以武漢肺炎的傳
04/11 08:40, 13F

04/11 08:41, 5年前 , 14F
染速度如果源頭在歐美 三個月前就炸鍋了
04/11 08:41, 14F
※ 編輯: ProfAsk (123.194.189.235 臺灣), 04/11/2020 09:05:46

04/11 09:20, 5年前 , 15F
看不出什麼大外宣,那篇結論是病毒起源於武漢,傳播出去
04/11 09:20, 15F

04/11 09:20, 5年前 , 16F
後發生兩次變種
04/11 09:20, 16F

04/11 09:20, 5年前 , 17F
你真的會看文章嗎?
04/11 09:20, 17F

04/11 09:23, 5年前 , 18F
中國初期感染人數多,病毒當然會在中國變異成適應力更好
04/11 09:23, 18F

04/11 09:24, 5年前 , 19F
的B
04/11 09:24, 19F

04/11 09:39, 5年前 , 20F
第一代的病毒在美國確實感染人數最多的,有趣的現象
04/11 09:39, 20F

04/11 09:52, 5年前 , 21F
武漢肺炎 中國特色之冠狀病毒
04/11 09:52, 21F

04/11 23:57, 5年前 , 22F
這篇新聞寫錯,去年SARS-CoV在中國大陸已經突變。
04/11 23:57, 22F

04/12 13:04, 5年前 , 23F
PNAS 是最頂尖的學術期刊 這個都不信就沒辦法了
04/12 13:04, 23F

04/12 13:06, 5年前 , 24F
不過病毒株的研究 中科院西雙版納植物園不是發過了?
04/12 13:06, 24F

04/12 13:08, 5年前 , 25F
作者最後認為的結論是病毒可能起源於東亞
04/12 13:08, 25F

04/12 13:10, 5年前 , 26F
在哪段說病毒起源於東亞?
04/12 13:10, 26F

04/12 13:16, 5年前 , 27F
這篇論文最有趣的地方就是首例檢測並上傳病毒基因的時
04/12 13:16, 27F

04/12 13:16, 5年前 , 28F
間是12/24 ,病毒種類是B型,過3週之後A型才被中國檢
04/12 13:16, 28F

04/12 13:16, 5年前 , 29F
測出來,4週之後美國的A型才被檢測出來,然後美澳A型被
04/12 13:16, 29F

04/12 13:16, 5年前 , 30F
檢測出來的時間點是過4~7週
04/12 13:16, 30F

04/12 13:29, 5年前 , 31F
論文沒說 後來採訪說的
04/12 13:29, 31F

04/12 13:38, 5年前 , 32F
不是最古老就是起源地 通常是最多元的才是起源地
04/12 13:38, 32F

04/12 13:39, 5年前 , 33F
你是不是忘了澳洲跟美國都一大堆中國人
04/12 13:39, 33F

04/12 14:30, 5年前 , 34F
這研究證明了病毒就是來自武漢無誤!
04/12 14:30, 34F
文章代碼(AID): #1UaFvOp1 (Gossiping)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1UaFvOp1 (Gossiping)