[新聞] 挺一例一休修法 郭正亮:如果企業倒了呢?消失
挺一例一休修法 郭正亮:如果企業倒了呢?
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20171110005023-260407
2017年11月10日 17:15 中時電子報 王家禕
行政院長賴清德正式拍板一例一休修法,引發諸多爭議,勞團千人抗議。郭正亮在節目表示
,一例一休造成三輸的局面,所以需要一些彈性安排,「企業結構就是這樣,你總要讓他生
存嘛!」
民進黨立委郭正亮參加年代電視節目《新聞面對面》時表示,台灣的勞工結構,中小企業雇
用了77%的員工,98%的企業都是中小企業,所以不能用大公司、大企業的角度來理解勞資
結構。更多數的老闆可能是兢兢業業在跟勞工一起做事,只是求企業能夠繼續經營下去。所
以民調才顯示這樣的結果。
郭正亮認為,顯然既有的一例一休是有問題的。有些勞工想加班沒得加班,消費者也抱怨,
變成三輸的局面。台灣產業結構,不是勞團所講的產業結構。
面對薪水成長停滯的質疑,郭正亮直言薪水沒漲與一例一休無關。過去十年GDP成長大概
39.6%,薪水則幾乎沒有提高,這是台灣產業升級出問題,或者企業外流造成的。現實的情
況就是14、15年薪資都沒成長,現況如此,還要把一例一休維持限制,那就是造成現在的三
輸局面。
郭正亮說,旺季到了就要連續趕單,所以才需要彈性安排的可能性。勞工就一定不願意嗎?
勞工或許跟雇主說:「我們就趕這個單,可能一月就淡季了。」這是產業造成的。郭重申,
「企業結構就是這樣,你總要讓他生存嘛!生存之後才有勞工可以進一步發展的可能性,如
果企業倒了呢?那還有什麼呢?」
--
中国台湾人的驕傲-両岸一家亲
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.42.37.44
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1510369737.A.41E.html
推
11/11 11:09, , 1F
11/11 11:09, 1F
→
11/11 11:09, , 2F
11/11 11:09, 2F
→
11/11 11:09, , 3F
11/11 11:09, 3F
噓
11/11 11:10, , 4F
11/11 11:10, 4F
噓
11/11 11:10, , 5F
11/11 11:10, 5F
噓
11/11 11:10, , 6F
11/11 11:10, 6F
推
11/11 11:10, , 7F
11/11 11:10, 7F
噓
11/11 11:10, , 8F
11/11 11:10, 8F
噓
11/11 11:11, , 9F
11/11 11:11, 9F
噓
11/11 11:11, , 10F
11/11 11:11, 10F
→
11/11 11:11, , 11F
11/11 11:11, 11F
噓
11/11 11:11, , 12F
11/11 11:11, 12F
噓
11/11 11:11, , 13F
11/11 11:11, 13F
噓
11/11 11:14, , 14F
11/11 11:14, 14F
推
11/11 11:14, , 15F
11/11 11:14, 15F
噓
11/11 11:16, , 16F
11/11 11:16, 16F
推
11/11 11:18, , 17F
11/11 11:18, 17F
噓
11/11 11:19, , 18F
11/11 11:19, 18F
噓
11/11 11:19, , 19F
11/11 11:19, 19F
噓
11/11 11:19, , 20F
11/11 11:19, 20F
→
11/11 11:20, , 21F
11/11 11:20, 21F
→
11/11 11:20, , 22F
11/11 11:20, 22F
推
11/11 11:21, , 23F
11/11 11:21, 23F

噓
11/11 11:22, , 24F
11/11 11:22, 24F
→
11/11 11:22, , 25F
11/11 11:22, 25F
→
11/11 11:23, , 26F
11/11 11:23, 26F
噓
11/11 11:23, , 27F
11/11 11:23, 27F
噓
11/11 11:24, , 28F
11/11 11:24, 28F
→
11/11 11:24, , 29F
11/11 11:24, 29F
噓
11/11 11:25, , 30F
11/11 11:25, 30F
噓
11/11 11:26, , 31F
11/11 11:26, 31F
→
11/11 11:28, , 32F
11/11 11:28, 32F
噓
11/11 11:30, , 33F
11/11 11:30, 33F
噓
11/11 11:31, , 34F
11/11 11:31, 34F
→
11/11 11:31, , 35F
11/11 11:31, 35F
→
11/11 11:31, , 36F
11/11 11:31, 36F
噓
11/11 11:33, , 37F
11/11 11:33, 37F
→
11/11 11:33, , 38F
11/11 11:33, 38F
噓
11/11 11:36, , 39F
11/11 11:36, 39F
還有 27 則推文
噓
11/11 12:05, , 67F
11/11 12:05, 67F
噓
11/11 12:06, , 68F
11/11 12:06, 68F
噓
11/11 12:07, , 69F
11/11 12:07, 69F
推
11/11 12:11, , 70F
11/11 12:11, 70F
推
11/11 12:11, , 71F
11/11 12:11, 71F
推
11/11 12:25, , 72F
11/11 12:25, 72F
噓
11/11 12:29, , 73F
11/11 12:29, 73F
噓
11/11 12:40, , 74F
11/11 12:40, 74F
噓
11/11 12:46, , 75F
11/11 12:46, 75F
噓
11/11 13:09, , 76F
11/11 13:09, 76F
噓
11/11 13:15, , 77F
11/11 13:15, 77F
→
11/11 13:16, , 78F
11/11 13:16, 78F
噓
11/11 13:16, , 79F
11/11 13:16, 79F
噓
11/11 13:18, , 80F
11/11 13:18, 80F
噓
11/11 13:19, , 81F
11/11 13:19, 81F
噓
11/11 13:20, , 82F
11/11 13:20, 82F
噓
11/11 13:22, , 83F
11/11 13:22, 83F
噓
11/11 14:07, , 84F
11/11 14:07, 84F
→
11/11 14:07, , 85F
11/11 14:07, 85F
→
11/11 14:08, , 86F
11/11 14:08, 86F
→
11/11 14:08, , 87F
11/11 14:08, 87F
噓
11/11 14:25, , 88F
11/11 14:25, 88F
噓
11/11 14:41, , 89F
11/11 14:41, 89F
噓
11/11 14:57, , 90F
11/11 14:57, 90F
→
11/11 14:58, , 91F
11/11 14:58, 91F
噓
11/11 15:44, , 92F
11/11 15:44, 92F
噓
11/11 15:44, , 93F
11/11 15:44, 93F
噓
11/11 15:58, , 94F
11/11 15:58, 94F
噓
11/11 16:39, , 95F
11/11 16:39, 95F
噓
11/11 17:10, , 96F
11/11 17:10, 96F
噓
11/11 17:39, , 97F
11/11 17:39, 97F
噓
11/11 17:44, , 98F
11/11 17:44, 98F
推
11/11 18:42, , 99F
11/11 18:42, 99F
噓
11/11 18:59, , 100F
11/11 18:59, 100F
噓
11/11 20:49, , 101F
11/11 20:49, 101F
噓
11/11 20:54, , 102F
11/11 20:54, 102F
噓
11/11 21:56, , 103F
11/11 21:56, 103F
→
11/11 22:51, , 104F
11/11 22:51, 104F

噓
11/12 00:15, , 105F
11/12 00:15, 105F
噓
11/12 14:41, , 106F
11/12 14:41, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 11 篇):