[新聞] 馮光遠法院封條貼家門 願邀宿敵吳宗憲節目對摃消失
1.媒體來源:
蘋果
馮光遠法院封條貼家門 願邀宿敵吳宗憲節目對摃
2017年10月13日20:41
馮光遠將在民視主持《夜深人未靜》,鐵齒不看黃曆挑好日子,反而在13號星期五宣布新
節目上檔,笑說:「剛好黑色星期五襯托黑色幽默。」他家中有張與盛治仁訴訟敗訴的單
據,貼在門口當「法院封條」,完全不怕被看到,還稱說是「捍衛言論自由的證據」,他
要求媒體不准稱呼他「哥」,只能叫他「光遠」,讓眾人啼笑皆非。
馮光遠表示以前居住美國非常喜歡看脫口秀,這次開新節目網羅強大編劇群,希望以黑色
幽默嘲諷看不慣的人事物,不匿名更不掩飾,但也因為這樣直言被問及付出的「代價」,
馮光遠笑說:「當然不小,我門口都貼了封條了。」
新節目來賓除了製作人邀請,大部分也是他志同道合的朋友,如果邀請昔日仇人吳宗憲來
節目上對談?馮光遠說:「當然OK,觀察他許久,認為女兒改變他很大,歡迎他來節目一
起創造不一樣的火花。」(毛敬智/台北報導)
https://goo.gl/4y91Qr
5.備註:
還想再被憲哥電一次?人家問你何謂巧婦難為無米之炊個屁,結果你上節目領8080在那邊
念憲法條文說憲法保障你喊放屁,最後還被沈玉琳那句創意不用錢,但執行創意要錢給徹
底打臉!
最扯的是節目後沒幾天就把在他臉書批他的,說是吳宗憲派去的網軍
這種咖還有人找他主持節目?是嫌經費太多?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.0.212.162
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1507905309.A.BD2.html
→
10/13 22:35, , 1F
10/13 22:35, 1F
噓
10/13 22:35, , 2F
10/13 22:35, 2F
→
10/13 22:35, , 3F
10/13 22:35, 3F
噓
10/13 22:36, , 4F
10/13 22:36, 4F
推
10/13 22:36, , 5F
10/13 22:36, 5F
→
10/13 22:36, , 6F
10/13 22:36, 6F
噓
10/13 22:37, , 7F
10/13 22:37, 7F
推
10/13 22:37, , 8F
10/13 22:37, 8F
推
10/13 22:37, , 9F
10/13 22:37, 9F
推
10/13 22:37, , 10F
10/13 22:37, 10F
→
10/13 22:37, , 11F
10/13 22:37, 11F
推
10/13 22:38, , 12F
10/13 22:38, 12F
噓
10/13 22:38, , 13F
10/13 22:38, 13F
→
10/13 22:38, , 14F
10/13 22:38, 14F
→
10/13 22:38, , 15F
10/13 22:38, 15F
噓
10/13 22:38, , 16F
10/13 22:38, 16F
噓
10/13 22:38, , 17F
10/13 22:38, 17F
噓
10/13 22:38, , 18F
10/13 22:38, 18F
噓
10/13 22:39, , 19F
10/13 22:39, 19F
→
10/13 22:39, , 20F
10/13 22:39, 20F
→
10/13 22:39, , 21F
10/13 22:39, 21F
→
10/13 22:39, , 22F
10/13 22:39, 22F
→
10/13 22:39, , 23F
10/13 22:39, 23F
噓
10/13 22:40, , 24F
10/13 22:40, 24F
噓
10/13 22:40, , 25F
10/13 22:40, 25F
推
10/13 22:40, , 26F
10/13 22:40, 26F
→
10/13 22:40, , 27F
10/13 22:40, 27F
噓
10/13 22:40, , 28F
10/13 22:40, 28F
噓
10/13 22:40, , 29F
10/13 22:40, 29F
→
10/13 22:40, , 30F
10/13 22:40, 30F
→
10/13 22:40, , 31F
10/13 22:40, 31F
→
10/13 22:40, , 32F
10/13 22:40, 32F
→
10/13 22:41, , 33F
10/13 22:41, 33F
噓
10/13 22:41, , 34F
10/13 22:41, 34F
噓
10/13 22:42, , 35F
10/13 22:42, 35F
→
10/13 22:42, , 36F
10/13 22:42, 36F
→
10/13 22:42, , 37F
10/13 22:42, 37F
噓
10/13 22:43, , 38F
10/13 22:43, 38F
噓
10/13 22:45, , 39F
10/13 22:45, 39F
推
10/13 22:48, , 40F
10/13 22:48, 40F
噓
10/13 22:49, , 41F
10/13 22:49, 41F
噓
10/13 22:51, , 42F
10/13 22:51, 42F
噓
10/13 22:57, , 43F
10/13 22:57, 43F
噓
10/13 23:04, , 44F
10/13 23:04, 44F
噓
10/13 23:26, , 45F
10/13 23:26, 45F
→
10/13 23:32, , 46F
10/13 23:32, 46F
噓
10/13 23:36, , 47F
10/13 23:36, 47F
→
10/14 01:35, , 48F
10/14 01:35, 48F
噓
10/14 02:02, , 49F
10/14 02:02, 49F
噓
10/14 03:23, , 50F
10/14 03:23, 50F
噓
10/14 04:08, , 51F
10/14 04:08, 51F
推
10/14 08:13, , 52F
10/14 08:13, 52F
噓
10/14 11:39, , 53F
10/14 11:39, 53F
→
10/14 12:31, , 54F
10/14 12:31, 54F
噓
10/16 23:25, , 55F
10/16 23:25, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):