Re: [問卦] 為何罵人的是乃哥,被排擠的是從從?消失
應然面:
徐罵人當然不對。
實然面:
所謂行有行規,每一行都有他的規矩,這規矩不一定是合理的,但從業人員都會知道界線
在哪,不會去踩。
從從不是笨蛋,他也在演藝圈多年,當他被罵成這樣還選擇向徐道歉時,說明了他的經驗
告訴他必須這樣做才有辦法在這行繼續生存,其實他第一時間的反應才是最專業的內行人
做法,為了生存只能這樣。
結果新聞媒體一直炒,網友(不限ptt)也跟風,大家都很有道理啊,但那都是局外人的意
見,都是以應然面的角度看事,其實不實用。
媒體跟網友的過度關注絕對會影響從從的判斷,這種氛圍會讓他以為整個社會都在相挺,
那部半夜哭訴的影片就是在新聞連番報導後出來的,
從從可憐,我不會說這是網友的錯,因為人會路見不平很正常,但有類似困境的人請記住
,別人的意見只能參考,尤其是不認識的網友的意見,看過就好,也希望從從能渡過這次
難關。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.182.48
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1507091240.A.CEE.html
→
10/04 12:28, , 1F
10/04 12:28, 1F
唉。
噓
10/04 12:28, , 2F
10/04 12:28, 2F
推
10/04 12:30, , 3F
10/04 12:30, 3F
→
10/04 12:30, , 4F
10/04 12:30, 4F
很現實的。
噓
10/04 12:30, , 5F
10/04 12:30, 5F
好有道理喔。
推
10/04 12:31, , 6F
10/04 12:31, 6F
網友路見不平也正常,只是幫助不大。
※ 編輯: todao (180.217.182.48), 10/04/2017 12:32:32
→
10/04 12:32, , 7F
10/04 12:32, 7F
推
10/04 12:32, , 8F
10/04 12:32, 8F
→
10/04 12:33, , 9F
10/04 12:33, 9F
→
10/04 12:33, , 10F
10/04 12:33, 10F
推
10/04 12:34, , 11F
10/04 12:34, 11F
→
10/04 12:34, , 12F
10/04 12:34, 12F
→
10/04 12:34, , 13F
10/04 12:34, 13F
→
10/04 12:34, , 14F
10/04 12:34, 14F
→
10/04 12:35, , 15F
10/04 12:35, 15F
→
10/04 12:35, , 16F
10/04 12:35, 16F
推
10/04 12:38, , 17F
10/04 12:38, 17F
推
10/04 12:40, , 18F
10/04 12:40, 18F
推
10/04 12:40, , 19F
10/04 12:40, 19F
推
10/04 12:41, , 20F
10/04 12:41, 20F
推
10/04 12:41, , 21F
10/04 12:41, 21F
推
10/04 12:42, , 22F
10/04 12:42, 22F
推
10/04 12:43, , 23F
10/04 12:43, 23F
→
10/04 12:44, , 24F
10/04 12:44, 24F
推
10/04 12:48, , 25F
10/04 12:48, 25F
推
10/04 12:51, , 26F
10/04 12:51, 26F
→
10/04 12:58, , 27F
10/04 12:58, 27F
→
10/04 12:58, , 28F
10/04 12:58, 28F
→
10/04 12:58, , 29F
10/04 12:58, 29F
→
10/04 13:02, , 30F
10/04 13:02, 30F
推
10/04 13:02, , 31F
10/04 13:02, 31F
→
10/04 13:03, , 32F
10/04 13:03, 32F
→
10/04 13:03, , 33F
10/04 13:03, 33F
→
10/04 13:06, , 34F
10/04 13:06, 34F
推
10/04 13:13, , 35F
10/04 13:13, 35F
推
10/04 13:15, , 36F
10/04 13:15, 36F
→
10/04 13:15, , 37F
10/04 13:15, 37F
推
10/04 13:16, , 38F
10/04 13:16, 38F
→
10/04 13:17, , 39F
10/04 13:17, 39F
推
10/04 13:17, , 40F
10/04 13:17, 40F
→
10/04 13:18, , 41F
10/04 13:18, 41F
→
10/04 13:18, , 42F
10/04 13:18, 42F
推
10/04 13:56, , 43F
10/04 13:56, 43F
噓
10/04 14:04, , 44F
10/04 14:04, 44F
噓
10/04 14:17, , 45F
10/04 14:17, 45F
→
10/04 14:17, , 46F
10/04 14:17, 46F
推
10/04 14:26, , 47F
10/04 14:26, 47F
推
10/04 14:28, , 48F
10/04 14:28, 48F
→
10/04 14:29, , 49F
10/04 14:29, 49F
→
10/04 14:30, , 50F
10/04 14:30, 50F
推
10/04 16:48, , 51F
10/04 16:48, 51F
推
10/04 19:01, , 52F
10/04 19:01, 52F
噓
10/04 21:46, , 53F
10/04 21:46, 53F
→
10/04 21:47, , 54F
10/04 21:47, 54F
推
10/04 22:10, , 55F
10/04 22:10, 55F
推
10/04 22:10, , 56F
10/04 22:10, 56F
推
10/04 22:12, , 57F
10/04 22:12, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 25 篇):