[新聞] 周玉蔻批:民進黨不該被柯文哲吃夠夠消失
〔即時新聞/綜合報導〕原訂要出席新任警察局長交接典禮的台北市長柯文哲,卻臨時變卦,改由副市長鄧家基代打,引起外界聯想。對此,名嘴周玉蔻則是痛批柯,並認為「民進黨不該被吃夠夠」。
周玉蔻在臉書上分享柯P臨時取消新任警察局長交接典禮的相關新聞,並批評「這樣杯葛惡搞執政的民進黨政府指派的首都市長,還要人家禮讓支持」。
這讓周玉蔻反問說,「這是太幼稚,還是太愚蠢?我不知道,只知道民進黨不應該被吃夠夠!」
對於柯文哲臨時缺席新任警察局長交接典禮一事,北市府發言人劉奕霆僅說明,柯文哲缺席「沒有理由」。
名嘴周玉蔻認為「民進黨不該被吃夠夠」。(資料照,記者項程鎮攝)
http://m.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2200410
呃 講反了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 158.69.25.96
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1506042721.A.99A.html
推
09/22 09:12, , 1F
09/22 09:12, 1F
→
09/22 09:13, , 2F
09/22 09:13, 2F
推
09/22 09:14, , 3F
09/22 09:14, 3F
→
09/22 09:14, , 4F
09/22 09:14, 4F
噓
09/22 09:14, , 5F
09/22 09:14, 5F
噓
09/22 09:14, , 6F
09/22 09:14, 6F
→
09/22 09:14, , 7F
09/22 09:14, 7F
→
09/22 09:14, , 8F
09/22 09:14, 8F
→
09/22 09:15, , 9F
09/22 09:15, 9F
噓
09/22 09:15, , 10F
09/22 09:15, 10F
→
09/22 09:16, , 11F
09/22 09:16, 11F
噓
09/22 09:16, , 12F
09/22 09:16, 12F
→
09/22 09:16, , 13F
09/22 09:16, 13F
推
09/22 09:16, , 14F
09/22 09:16, 14F
→
09/22 09:16, , 15F
09/22 09:16, 15F
噓
09/22 09:17, , 16F
09/22 09:17, 16F
推
09/22 09:17, , 17F
09/22 09:17, 17F
→
09/22 09:17, , 18F
09/22 09:17, 18F
→
09/22 09:17, , 19F
09/22 09:17, 19F
推
09/22 09:17, , 20F
09/22 09:17, 20F
噓
09/22 09:19, , 21F
09/22 09:19, 21F
噓
09/22 09:19, , 22F
09/22 09:19, 22F
噓
09/22 09:19, , 23F
09/22 09:19, 23F
噓
09/22 09:21, , 24F
09/22 09:21, 24F
→
09/22 09:22, , 25F
09/22 09:22, 25F
噓
09/22 09:24, , 26F
09/22 09:24, 26F
→
09/22 09:24, , 27F
09/22 09:24, 27F
→
09/22 09:25, , 28F
09/22 09:25, 28F
噓
09/22 09:26, , 29F
09/22 09:26, 29F
噓
09/22 09:27, , 30F
09/22 09:27, 30F
→
09/22 09:29, , 31F
09/22 09:29, 31F
噓
09/22 09:31, , 32F
09/22 09:31, 32F
噓
09/22 09:33, , 33F
09/22 09:33, 33F
→
09/22 09:33, , 34F
09/22 09:33, 34F
噓
09/22 09:34, , 35F
09/22 09:34, 35F
噓
09/22 09:34, , 36F
09/22 09:34, 36F
噓
09/22 09:36, , 37F
09/22 09:36, 37F
噓
09/22 09:44, , 38F
09/22 09:44, 38F
噓
09/22 09:47, , 39F
09/22 09:47, 39F
噓
09/22 09:50, , 40F
09/22 09:50, 40F
噓
09/22 09:53, , 41F
09/22 09:53, 41F
噓
09/22 09:57, , 42F
09/22 09:57, 42F
噓
09/22 10:00, , 43F
09/22 10:00, 43F
噓
09/22 10:05, , 44F
09/22 10:05, 44F
噓
09/22 10:09, , 45F
09/22 10:09, 45F
推
09/22 10:13, , 46F
09/22 10:13, 46F
噓
09/22 10:15, , 47F
09/22 10:15, 47F
→
09/22 10:16, , 48F
09/22 10:16, 48F
推
09/22 10:19, , 49F
09/22 10:19, 49F
推
09/22 10:21, , 50F
09/22 10:21, 50F
推
09/22 10:22, , 51F
09/22 10:22, 51F
推
09/22 10:25, , 52F
09/22 10:25, 52F
→
09/22 10:26, , 53F
09/22 10:26, 53F
推
09/22 10:26, , 54F
09/22 10:26, 54F
→
09/22 10:27, , 55F
09/22 10:27, 55F
噓
09/22 10:29, , 56F
09/22 10:29, 56F
噓
09/22 10:32, , 57F
09/22 10:32, 57F
噓
09/22 10:33, , 58F
09/22 10:33, 58F
噓
09/22 10:47, , 59F
09/22 10:47, 59F
噓
09/22 10:48, , 60F
09/22 10:48, 60F
噓
09/22 10:54, , 61F
09/22 10:54, 61F
噓
09/22 11:05, , 62F
09/22 11:05, 62F
推
09/22 11:36, , 63F
09/22 11:36, 63F
噓
09/22 11:38, , 64F
09/22 11:38, 64F
→
09/22 11:41, , 65F
09/22 11:41, 65F
噓
09/22 12:26, , 66F
09/22 12:26, 66F
噓
09/22 12:45, , 67F
09/22 12:45, 67F
→
09/22 12:53, , 68F
09/22 12:53, 68F
噓
09/22 12:53, , 69F
09/22 12:53, 69F
推
09/22 15:52, , 70F
09/22 15:52, 70F
噓
09/22 17:53, , 71F
09/22 17:53, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):