[新聞] 雨遮不登記不計價 建商嗆:房價至少漲一成消失
ETNEWS新聞雲
雨遮不登記不計價 建商嗆:房價至少漲一成
新成屋雨遮屋簷不登記不計價2018年起上路,對此,有建商就跳出來直言,政府實施雨遮
不登記的目的不明確,若是要打房或是讓年輕人更容易買得起房子,「根本毫無幫助」,
最後只會反映回房價上,至少會漲一成。
亞昕開發董事長姚連地說,「政府做雨遮不登記目的是什麼?是打房?還是為了讓年輕人
更容易買得起房子?如果要打房我覺得方法很多,不一定要用這個,因為毫無幫助、毫無
意義,得不到社會良性循環,只有擾民而已。」
姚連地解釋,不動產登記法各國不同,像馬來西亞是實坪制,玄關門以內計算面積公設全
不計算,但並不是說公設不登記不賣錢,成本就不用計算在售價,成本還是會加進去,最
後反映在售價,「應得的利潤還是要得到。」
愛山林建設總經理張境在也表示,羊毛出在羊身上,現在市場上雨遮登記面積大概5~10
%,將來若不能登記,會直接反映到售價,「現在有業者雨遮已經不計算在權狀上,但賣
的價格比一般市場高出一成甚至兩三成。」
張境在指出,現在大家談房地產好像都針對建商,但建商在市場上交易的量大概只有三成
,其餘七成是房仲或是屋主自行買賣,他反問:「如果你房子買100坪,賣的時候只剩70
坪,你要怎麼賣?要賣什麼價格?」
張境在說,會用原來的單價賣出去嗎?不可能,一定用原來的單價反算上去,如此一來房
價至少都會漲個一成,這又會這會造成社會恐慌,或是讓政府產生房價又高漲的疑慮。
對此,姚連地建議,政府應該是要求所有開發商公平、公開、透明,把主建物、附屬建物
、雨遮、陽台、車位幾坪、各賣多少錢都表列出來,讓消費者不要受騙,其他應該是尊重
市場機制,讓市場決定。
https://house.ettoday.net/news/1013269
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.20.242.75
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505715641.A.832.html
推
09/18 14:20, , 1F
09/18 14:20, 1F
推
09/18 14:21, , 2F
09/18 14:21, 2F
推
09/18 14:21, , 3F
09/18 14:21, 3F
→
09/18 14:21, , 4F
09/18 14:21, 4F
推
09/18 14:21, , 5F
09/18 14:21, 5F
推
09/18 14:21, , 6F
09/18 14:21, 6F
→
09/18 14:21, , 7F
09/18 14:21, 7F
噓
09/18 14:21, , 8F
09/18 14:21, 8F
推
09/18 14:21, , 9F
09/18 14:21, 9F
推
09/18 14:21, , 10F
09/18 14:21, 10F
推
09/18 14:22, , 11F
09/18 14:22, 11F
→
09/18 14:22, , 12F
09/18 14:22, 12F
推
09/18 14:22, , 13F
09/18 14:22, 13F
→
09/18 14:22, , 14F
09/18 14:22, 14F
推
09/18 14:22, , 15F
09/18 14:22, 15F
推
09/18 14:22, , 16F
09/18 14:22, 16F
推
09/18 14:22, , 17F
09/18 14:22, 17F
→
09/18 14:23, , 18F
09/18 14:23, 18F
推
09/18 14:23, , 19F
09/18 14:23, 19F
推
09/18 14:23, , 20F
09/18 14:23, 20F
推
09/18 14:23, , 21F
09/18 14:23, 21F
→
09/18 14:23, , 22F
09/18 14:23, 22F
→
09/18 14:23, , 23F
09/18 14:23, 23F
推
09/18 14:23, , 24F
09/18 14:23, 24F
推
09/18 14:23, , 25F
09/18 14:23, 25F
→
09/18 14:23, , 26F
09/18 14:23, 26F
→
09/18 14:23, , 27F
09/18 14:23, 27F
推
09/18 14:23, , 28F
09/18 14:23, 28F
→
09/18 14:23, , 29F
09/18 14:23, 29F
→
09/18 14:23, , 30F
09/18 14:23, 30F
推
09/18 14:24, , 31F
09/18 14:24, 31F
推
09/18 14:24, , 32F
09/18 14:24, 32F
→
09/18 14:24, , 33F
09/18 14:24, 33F
→
09/18 14:24, , 34F
09/18 14:24, 34F
推
09/18 14:24, , 35F
09/18 14:24, 35F
推
09/18 14:24, , 36F
09/18 14:24, 36F
噓
09/18 14:24, , 37F
09/18 14:24, 37F
噓
09/18 14:24, , 38F
09/18 14:24, 38F
推
09/18 14:24, , 39F
09/18 14:24, 39F
還有 875 則推文
推
09/18 22:10, , 915F
09/18 22:10, 915F
推
09/18 22:21, , 916F
09/18 22:21, 916F
推
09/18 22:22, , 917F
09/18 22:22, 917F
推
09/18 22:40, , 918F
09/18 22:40, 918F
推
09/18 22:40, , 919F
09/18 22:40, 919F
推
09/18 23:07, , 920F
09/18 23:07, 920F
→
09/18 23:10, , 921F
09/18 23:10, 921F
推
09/18 23:11, , 922F
09/18 23:11, 922F
噓
09/18 23:12, , 923F
09/18 23:12, 923F
推
09/18 23:13, , 924F
09/18 23:13, 924F
推
09/18 23:14, , 925F
09/18 23:14, 925F
推
09/18 23:42, , 926F
09/18 23:42, 926F
推
09/19 00:14, , 927F
09/19 00:14, 927F
推
09/19 00:27, , 928F
09/19 00:27, 928F
推
09/19 00:56, , 929F
09/19 00:56, 929F
推
09/19 01:03, , 930F
09/19 01:03, 930F
推
09/19 01:36, , 931F
09/19 01:36, 931F
推
09/19 02:10, , 932F
09/19 02:10, 932F
→
09/19 02:11, , 933F
09/19 02:11, 933F
→
09/19 02:37, , 934F
09/19 02:37, 934F
→
09/19 02:39, , 935F
09/19 02:39, 935F
推
09/19 03:02, , 936F
09/19 03:02, 936F
推
09/19 06:37, , 937F
09/19 06:37, 937F
→
09/19 07:29, , 938F
09/19 07:29, 938F
推
09/19 07:51, , 939F
09/19 07:51, 939F
推
09/19 08:02, , 940F
09/19 08:02, 940F
推
09/19 08:12, , 941F
09/19 08:12, 941F
推
09/19 08:19, , 942F
09/19 08:19, 942F
推
09/19 08:32, , 943F
09/19 08:32, 943F
推
09/19 10:40, , 944F
09/19 10:40, 944F
推
09/19 12:25, , 945F
09/19 12:25, 945F
推
09/19 13:51, , 946F
09/19 13:51, 946F
推
09/19 14:18, , 947F
09/19 14:18, 947F
推
09/19 15:09, , 948F
09/19 15:09, 948F
→
09/19 17:12, , 949F
09/19 17:12, 949F
→
09/19 17:13, , 950F
09/19 17:13, 950F
→
09/20 00:01, , 951F
09/20 00:01, 951F
推
09/20 21:25, , 952F
09/20 21:25, 952F
推
09/21 16:37, , 953F
09/21 16:37, 953F
推
09/28 22:37, , 954F
09/28 22:37, 954F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):