[新聞] 被外媒說買不起iPhone8 中國網民嗆:我們有華為消失
1.媒體來源:
蘋果日報
2.完整新聞標題:
被外媒說買不起iPhone8 中國網民嗆:我們有華為
3.完整新聞內文:
蘋果最新一代智慧型手機「iPhone 8」發表在即,卻被外媒《路透社》唱衰,直言「1000
美元的售價太貴了,中國人買不起」,恐怕無助提振iPhone在亞洲市場日益疲軟的市佔率
,沒想到消息傳回中國國內,意外引發中國網民群情激憤、一陣撻伐,「為什麼不買?因
為我們有華為了啊!」
根據《路透社》的報導指出,對於蘋果來說,這一代iPhone能否在中國成功是至關重要的
,尤其在經歷了一段低潮期之後,曾經被大家「覬覦」的iPhone地位已經不復存在,目前
蘋果手機在中國市場僅僅排名第5,還落後於中國的國產品牌華為、Oppo、Vivo和小米。
儘管新一代iPhone新增了無線充電、先進觸碰螢幕和臉部識別技術,但還是沒能複制之前
iPhone推出時中國網絡上熱議的盛大景象,《路透社》認為,關鍵就在定價,「面對價格
將高達1000美元甚至更貴的iPhone 8,約等同於中國人均月工資的2倍,中國消費者很可
能會望之卻步。」
結果這篇報導被中國媒體以「路透社唱衰iPhone8:太貴了 中國人買不起」為題大肆報
導,許多中國網民看到新聞都十分氣憤,「激將法,不上當」、「不是我們買不起蘋果,
而是蘋果已經配不上我」、「信不信我們中國人給路透社買下來!」(即時新聞中心/綜
合報導)
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://m.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/3c/20170913/1202661/
5.備註:
好好好,你們華為好棒棒,記得用好用滿,我笑了,這種沒人要用的手機也只能自己講自
己爽而已了,光是昨晚到今天發文提到iphone的文粗估至少超過100篇,華為?????
那是什麼?會有人將這視為品質的品牌嗎?????
先不說品質,光說隱私性行不行那才是重點咧,中國的東西
別忘了威盛電子可是光明正大的安裝監聽晶片在裡面呢,中共下的中國的產物,這你敢用
?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.15.3.8
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505281765.A.ED8.html
→
09/13 13:49, , 1F
09/13 13:49, 1F
→
09/13 13:49, , 2F
09/13 13:49, 2F
推
09/13 13:49, , 3F
09/13 13:49, 3F
→
09/13 13:50, , 4F
09/13 13:50, 4F
→
09/13 13:50, , 5F
09/13 13:50, 5F
推
09/13 13:50, , 6F
09/13 13:50, 6F
→
09/13 13:50, , 7F
09/13 13:50, 7F
→
09/13 13:50, , 8F
09/13 13:50, 8F
推
09/13 13:50, , 9F
09/13 13:50, 9F
推
09/13 13:50, , 10F
09/13 13:50, 10F
推
09/13 13:50, , 11F
09/13 13:50, 11F
推
09/13 13:50, , 12F
09/13 13:50, 12F
推
09/13 13:51, , 13F
09/13 13:51, 13F
→
09/13 13:51, , 14F
09/13 13:51, 14F
推
09/13 13:51, , 15F
09/13 13:51, 15F
推
09/13 13:52, , 16F
09/13 13:52, 16F
推
09/13 13:52, , 17F
09/13 13:52, 17F
推
09/13 13:52, , 18F
09/13 13:52, 18F
→
09/13 13:52, , 19F
09/13 13:52, 19F
推
09/13 13:52, , 20F
09/13 13:52, 20F
→
09/13 13:52, , 21F
09/13 13:52, 21F
推
09/13 13:52, , 22F
09/13 13:52, 22F
推
09/13 13:53, , 23F
09/13 13:53, 23F
→
09/13 13:53, , 24F
09/13 13:53, 24F
推
09/13 13:53, , 25F
09/13 13:53, 25F
推
09/13 13:53, , 26F
09/13 13:53, 26F
→
09/13 13:54, , 27F
09/13 13:54, 27F
推
09/13 13:54, , 28F
09/13 13:54, 28F
推
09/13 13:54, , 29F
09/13 13:54, 29F
→
09/13 13:55, , 30F
09/13 13:55, 30F
推
09/13 13:55, , 31F
09/13 13:55, 31F
→
09/13 13:56, , 32F
09/13 13:56, 32F
→
09/13 13:56, , 33F
09/13 13:56, 33F
推
09/13 13:57, , 34F
09/13 13:57, 34F
推
09/13 13:58, , 35F
09/13 13:58, 35F
推
09/13 13:58, , 36F
09/13 13:58, 36F
推
09/13 13:59, , 37F
09/13 13:59, 37F
推
09/13 13:59, , 38F
09/13 13:59, 38F
推
09/13 14:00, , 39F
09/13 14:00, 39F
還有 225 則推文
推
09/13 17:50, , 265F
09/13 17:50, 265F
推
09/13 17:50, , 266F
09/13 17:50, 266F
推
09/13 18:02, , 267F
09/13 18:02, 267F
推
09/13 18:24, , 268F
09/13 18:24, 268F
推
09/13 18:38, , 269F
09/13 18:38, 269F
推
09/13 19:07, , 270F
09/13 19:07, 270F
推
09/13 19:08, , 271F
09/13 19:08, 271F
推
09/13 19:17, , 272F
09/13 19:17, 272F
推
09/13 19:22, , 273F
09/13 19:22, 273F
推
09/13 19:24, , 274F
09/13 19:24, 274F
推
09/13 19:35, , 275F
09/13 19:35, 275F
推
09/13 19:40, , 276F
09/13 19:40, 276F
推
09/13 19:41, , 277F
09/13 19:41, 277F
推
09/13 19:53, , 278F
09/13 19:53, 278F
推
09/13 20:27, , 279F
09/13 20:27, 279F
推
09/13 20:27, , 280F
09/13 20:27, 280F
噓
09/13 20:55, , 281F
09/13 20:55, 281F
→
09/13 20:56, , 282F
09/13 20:56, 282F
推
09/13 22:01, , 283F
09/13 22:01, 283F
推
09/13 22:23, , 284F
09/13 22:23, 284F
推
09/13 22:53, , 285F
09/13 22:53, 285F
→
09/13 22:56, , 286F
09/13 22:56, 286F
推
09/13 23:04, , 287F
09/13 23:04, 287F
→
09/13 23:06, , 288F
09/13 23:06, 288F
推
09/14 00:05, , 289F
09/14 00:05, 289F
推
09/14 00:08, , 290F
09/14 00:08, 290F
→
09/14 00:10, , 291F
09/14 00:10, 291F
推
09/14 00:22, , 292F
09/14 00:22, 292F
推
09/14 01:42, , 293F
09/14 01:42, 293F
推
09/14 01:59, , 294F
09/14 01:59, 294F
推
09/14 02:28, , 295F
09/14 02:28, 295F
推
09/14 03:43, , 296F
09/14 03:43, 296F
推
09/14 06:18, , 297F
09/14 06:18, 297F
推
09/14 06:47, , 298F
09/14 06:47, 298F
推
09/14 07:17, , 299F
09/14 07:17, 299F
噓
09/14 09:41, , 300F
09/14 09:41, 300F
噓
09/14 10:06, , 301F
09/14 10:06, 301F
推
09/14 11:58, , 302F
09/14 11:58, 302F
推
09/15 08:10, , 303F
09/15 08:10, 303F
推
09/17 01:13, , 304F
09/17 01:13, 304F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):