[問卦] 中國外交部的人是不是沒讀過孫子兵法?消失
孫子曰:凡用兵之法,全國為上,破國次之﹔全軍為上,破軍次之;全旅為上,破旅次
之﹔全卒為上,破卒次之﹔全伍為上,破伍次之。 是故百戰百勝,非善之善也﹔不戰而
屈人之兵,善之善者也。 故上兵伐謀,其次伐交,其次伐兵,其下攻城。
中國在國際上屢次恐嚇、威脅台灣
但根據孫子兵法裡面認為最好的作戰方式是將國家經營好,體制完善
不用作戰就能使敵人屈服
其實,台獨我認為根本是個假議題
因為台灣現實情況就是一個獨立國家(至於國號為中華民國又是另一個議題先不討論)
台灣人其實不是逢中必反
如果中國現在有良好的制度、能保障人民的基本權
對台灣展現友善態度
像是台灣要參加聯合國這種跟主權比較有關係的我認為中國不讓步ok
但像參加WHA這種跟民生相關你不讓步讓台灣被排擠在世界之外
台灣人要怎麼隊中國有好感?
中國對台灣讓利
講真的
也只有肥了那些無祖國的商(傷)人
一般人民根本無感
所以中國的官員是不是都不讀孫子阿???
2000多年前祖先就懂得智慧竟然被這些共匪棄為敝屣
幫孫子QQ
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.104.13
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505234648.A.FE5.html
推
09/13 00:44, , 1F
09/13 00:44, 1F
推
09/13 00:44, , 2F
09/13 00:44, 2F
噓
09/13 00:45, , 3F
09/13 00:45, 3F
推
09/13 00:45, , 4F
09/13 00:45, 4F
噓
09/13 00:45, , 5F
09/13 00:45, 5F
推
09/13 00:45, , 6F
09/13 00:45, 6F
噓
09/13 00:45, , 7F
09/13 00:45, 7F
噓
09/13 00:45, , 8F
09/13 00:45, 8F
推
09/13 00:45, , 9F
09/13 00:45, 9F
推
09/13 00:47, , 10F
09/13 00:47, 10F
推
09/13 00:47, , 11F
09/13 00:47, 11F
→
09/13 00:47, , 12F
09/13 00:47, 12F
推
09/13 00:47, , 13F
09/13 00:47, 13F
推
09/13 00:47, , 14F
09/13 00:47, 14F
推
09/13 00:48, , 15F
09/13 00:48, 15F
→
09/13 00:48, , 16F
09/13 00:48, 16F
→
09/13 00:48, , 17F
09/13 00:48, 17F
→
09/13 00:48, , 18F
09/13 00:48, 18F
推
09/13 00:49, , 19F
09/13 00:49, 19F
推
09/13 00:51, , 20F
09/13 00:51, 20F
推
09/13 00:51, , 21F
09/13 00:51, 21F
→
09/13 00:51, , 22F
09/13 00:51, 22F
推
09/13 00:52, , 23F
09/13 00:52, 23F
→
09/13 00:55, , 24F
09/13 00:55, 24F
推
09/13 00:56, , 25F
09/13 00:56, 25F
噓
09/13 01:00, , 26F
09/13 01:00, 26F
推
09/13 01:04, , 27F
09/13 01:04, 27F
→
09/13 01:08, , 28F
09/13 01:08, 28F
推
09/13 01:10, , 29F
09/13 01:10, 29F
→
09/13 01:11, , 30F
09/13 01:11, 30F
推
09/13 01:13, , 31F
09/13 01:13, 31F
推
09/13 01:15, , 32F
09/13 01:15, 32F
→
09/13 01:20, , 33F
09/13 01:20, 33F
噓
09/13 01:21, , 34F
09/13 01:21, 34F
推
09/13 01:23, , 35F
09/13 01:23, 35F
→
09/13 01:23, , 36F
09/13 01:23, 36F
→
09/13 01:28, , 37F
09/13 01:28, 37F
→
09/13 01:28, , 38F
09/13 01:28, 38F
推
09/13 01:30, , 39F
09/13 01:30, 39F
推
09/13 01:30, , 40F
09/13 01:30, 40F
推
09/13 01:30, , 41F
09/13 01:30, 41F
→
09/13 01:30, , 42F
09/13 01:30, 42F
→
09/13 01:30, , 43F
09/13 01:30, 43F
→
09/13 01:30, , 44F
09/13 01:30, 44F
→
09/13 01:30, , 45F
09/13 01:30, 45F
→
09/13 01:31, , 46F
09/13 01:31, 46F
→
09/13 01:34, , 47F
09/13 01:34, 47F
→
09/13 01:37, , 48F
09/13 01:37, 48F
推
09/13 02:40, , 49F
09/13 02:40, 49F
推
09/13 02:58, , 50F
09/13 02:58, 50F
推
09/13 03:00, , 51F
09/13 03:00, 51F
推
09/13 06:56, , 52F
09/13 06:56, 52F
→
09/13 07:35, , 53F
09/13 07:35, 53F
推
09/13 10:15, , 54F
09/13 10:15, 54F
推
09/13 11:16, , 55F
09/13 11:16, 55F
→
09/13 11:16, , 56F
09/13 11:16, 56F
推
09/13 20:30, , 57F
09/13 20:30, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):