Re: [新聞] 「天然獨」四大特徵:中華民國等於台灣?消失
我覺得去區分獨立建國跟維持獨立現狀來去解析天然獨內涵耗時又沒意義,
應該從反面去探索,只要回答下面2個問題,如果答案都是NO,那你就是天然獨,
1、你是否願意被中國統治??
2、你是否願意比照香港一國兩制的方法被中國統治??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.47.7.182
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505178890.A.039.html
→
09/12 09:15, , 1F
09/12 09:15, 1F
推
09/12 09:16, , 2F
09/12 09:16, 2F
→
09/12 09:16, , 3F
09/12 09:16, 3F
推
09/12 09:16, , 4F
09/12 09:16, 4F
→
09/12 09:16, , 5F
09/12 09:16, 5F
→
09/12 09:16, , 6F
09/12 09:16, 6F
→
09/12 09:16, , 7F
09/12 09:16, 7F
→
09/12 09:16, , 8F
09/12 09:16, 8F
→
09/12 09:17, , 9F
09/12 09:17, 9F
→
09/12 09:17, , 10F
09/12 09:17, 10F
推
09/12 09:17, , 11F
09/12 09:17, 11F
→
09/12 09:18, , 12F
09/12 09:18, 12F
→
09/12 09:18, , 13F
09/12 09:18, 13F
→
09/12 09:18, , 14F
09/12 09:18, 14F
→
09/12 09:18, , 15F
09/12 09:18, 15F
→
09/12 09:19, , 16F
09/12 09:19, 16F
→
09/12 09:19, , 17F
09/12 09:19, 17F
→
09/12 09:19, , 18F
09/12 09:19, 18F
→
09/12 09:19, , 19F
09/12 09:19, 19F
→
09/12 09:21, , 20F
09/12 09:21, 20F
→
09/12 09:22, , 21F
09/12 09:22, 21F
推
09/12 09:23, , 22F
09/12 09:23, 22F
推
09/12 09:23, , 23F
09/12 09:23, 23F
我覺得你會陷入統派設的圈套,
你不想統一->你就是台獨,中國會打你->你不敢反抗->那你就不支持台獨->你支持統一,
這種論辯法看太多了,其實也沒什麼新意了。
→
09/12 09:24, , 24F
09/12 09:24, 24F
→
09/12 09:26, , 25F
09/12 09:26, 25F
→
09/12 09:26, , 26F
09/12 09:26, 26F
推
09/12 09:26, , 27F
09/12 09:26, 27F
願不願意當兵也是統派的論辯法,
你沒當兵->你憑什麼喊台獨->統派不會為了台獨去打仗!
這種論辯法也被王炳忠侯漢廷用爛了。
→
09/12 09:26, , 28F
09/12 09:26, 28F
推
09/12 09:26, , 29F
09/12 09:26, 29F
→
09/12 09:26, , 30F
09/12 09:26, 30F
→
09/12 09:26, , 31F
09/12 09:26, 31F
推
09/12 09:26, , 32F
09/12 09:26, 32F
推
09/12 09:26, , 33F
09/12 09:26, 33F
→
09/12 09:27, , 34F
09/12 09:27, 34F
→
09/12 09:27, , 35F
09/12 09:27, 35F
→
09/12 09:27, , 36F
09/12 09:27, 36F
→
09/12 09:27, , 37F
09/12 09:27, 37F
還有 112 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
09/12 11:53, , 150F
09/12 11:53, 150F
→
09/12 11:53, , 151F
09/12 11:53, 151F
→
09/12 11:57, , 152F
09/12 11:57, 152F
→
09/12 11:57, , 153F
09/12 11:57, 153F
→
09/12 12:00, , 154F
09/12 12:00, 154F
→
09/12 12:00, , 155F
09/12 12:00, 155F
→
09/12 12:02, , 156F
09/12 12:02, 156F
→
09/12 12:02, , 157F
09/12 12:02, 157F
→
09/12 12:02, , 158F
09/12 12:02, 158F
→
09/12 12:02, , 159F
09/12 12:02, 159F
→
09/12 12:05, , 160F
09/12 12:05, 160F
推
09/12 12:05, , 161F
09/12 12:05, 161F
→
09/12 12:05, , 162F
09/12 12:05, 162F
→
09/12 12:06, , 163F
09/12 12:06, 163F
推
09/12 12:09, , 164F
09/12 12:09, 164F
→
09/12 12:10, , 165F
09/12 12:10, 165F
→
09/12 12:10, , 166F
09/12 12:10, 166F
→
09/12 12:10, , 167F
09/12 12:10, 167F
→
09/12 12:15, , 168F
09/12 12:15, 168F
→
09/12 12:15, , 169F
09/12 12:15, 169F
→
09/12 12:16, , 170F
09/12 12:16, 170F
→
09/12 12:16, , 171F
09/12 12:16, 171F
推
09/12 12:22, , 172F
09/12 12:22, 172F
→
09/12 12:22, , 173F
09/12 12:22, 173F
推
09/12 12:40, , 174F
09/12 12:40, 174F
推
09/12 12:42, , 175F
09/12 12:42, 175F
推
09/12 12:54, , 176F
09/12 12:54, 176F
→
09/12 12:55, , 177F
09/12 12:55, 177F
→
09/12 12:57, , 178F
09/12 12:57, 178F
推
09/12 13:14, , 179F
09/12 13:14, 179F
→
09/12 13:14, , 180F
09/12 13:14, 180F
推
09/12 13:17, , 181F
09/12 13:17, 181F
→
09/12 13:45, , 182F
09/12 13:45, 182F
推
09/12 13:45, , 183F
09/12 13:45, 183F
噓
09/12 13:49, , 184F
09/12 13:49, 184F
→
09/12 15:46, , 185F
09/12 15:46, 185F
噓
09/12 15:50, , 186F
09/12 15:50, 186F
→
09/12 15:50, , 187F
09/12 15:50, 187F
推
09/13 00:52, , 188F
09/13 00:52, 188F
推
09/13 06:04, , 189F
09/13 06:04, 189F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 12 之 17 篇):