Re: [新聞] 北韓成功試爆氫彈! 蔡英文緊急召開國安會議消失
到底是哪來的信心讓你們覺得中國不會打台灣?
我都看過台灣戰略守則了
台灣根本打不贏中國
唯一的機會就是等美國開航母來救
而且要開三群才打得贏中共入侵戰
如果現在北韓拖住美國四個航母群
然後中共也不想再幫這個死屁孩
直接出東南軍區的兵力打台灣
美國也沒有餘力再幫台灣好嗎
重點是如果美國打北韓,中共沒派兵救
那他們根本沒有敵對戰爭關係好嗎
所以美國也沒必要為了台灣派兵
就是繼續維持那四個航母群在打北韓
日韓也是協同美國作戰
到時候台灣就會變成四面楚歌
這樣還不嚴重?
沒有必要開國安會議?
我看有些人真的過太爽了
都不知道戰爭是怎麼來的
二次世界大戰的歷史
中國的戰爭史多去看看好嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.77.74.32
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504422402.A.55F.html
※ 編輯: lapetos (42.77.74.32), 09/03/2017 15:07:21
→
09/03 15:07, , 1F
09/03 15:07, 1F
推
09/03 15:07, , 2F
09/03 15:07, 2F
→
09/03 15:07, , 3F
09/03 15:07, 3F
噓
09/03 15:07, , 4F
09/03 15:07, 4F
→
09/03 15:07, , 5F
09/03 15:07, 5F
→
09/03 15:07, , 6F
09/03 15:07, 6F
→
09/03 15:08, , 7F
09/03 15:08, 7F
→
09/03 15:08, , 8F
09/03 15:08, 8F
→
09/03 15:08, , 9F
09/03 15:08, 9F
推
09/03 15:08, , 10F
09/03 15:08, 10F
噓
09/03 15:08, , 11F
09/03 15:08, 11F
→
09/03 15:08, , 12F
09/03 15:08, 12F
→
09/03 15:08, , 13F
09/03 15:08, 13F
→
09/03 15:08, , 14F
09/03 15:08, 14F
→
09/03 15:08, , 15F
09/03 15:08, 15F
推
09/03 15:09, , 16F
09/03 15:09, 16F
推
09/03 15:09, , 17F
09/03 15:09, 17F
→
09/03 15:09, , 18F
09/03 15:09, 18F
噓
09/03 15:09, , 19F
09/03 15:09, 19F
推
09/03 15:09, , 20F
09/03 15:09, 20F
噓
09/03 15:09, , 21F
09/03 15:09, 21F
推
09/03 15:09, , 22F
09/03 15:09, 22F
噓
09/03 15:09, , 23F
09/03 15:09, 23F
推
09/03 15:09, , 24F
09/03 15:09, 24F
→
09/03 15:09, , 25F
09/03 15:09, 25F
→
09/03 15:10, , 26F
09/03 15:10, 26F
推
09/03 15:10, , 27F
09/03 15:10, 27F
→
09/03 15:10, , 28F
09/03 15:10, 28F
噓
09/03 15:10, , 29F
09/03 15:10, 29F
→
09/03 15:10, , 30F
09/03 15:10, 30F
噓
09/03 15:10, , 31F
09/03 15:10, 31F
→
09/03 15:10, , 32F
09/03 15:10, 32F
→
09/03 15:10, , 33F
09/03 15:10, 33F
噓
09/03 15:10, , 34F
09/03 15:10, 34F
噓
09/03 15:10, , 35F
09/03 15:10, 35F
→
09/03 15:11, , 36F
09/03 15:11, 36F
推
09/03 15:11, , 37F
09/03 15:11, 37F
噓
09/03 15:11, , 38F
09/03 15:11, 38F
噓
09/03 15:12, , 39F
09/03 15:12, 39F
→
09/03 15:12, , 40F
09/03 15:12, 40F
→
09/03 15:13, , 41F
09/03 15:13, 41F
推
09/03 15:13, , 42F
09/03 15:13, 42F
噓
09/03 15:15, , 43F
09/03 15:15, 43F
→
09/03 15:15, , 44F
09/03 15:15, 44F
噓
09/03 15:15, , 45F
09/03 15:15, 45F
→
09/03 15:16, , 46F
09/03 15:16, 46F
→
09/03 15:16, , 47F
09/03 15:16, 47F
推
09/03 15:16, , 48F
09/03 15:16, 48F
→
09/03 15:17, , 49F
09/03 15:17, 49F
推
09/03 15:19, , 50F
09/03 15:19, 50F
→
09/03 15:20, , 51F
09/03 15:20, 51F
→
09/03 15:21, , 52F
09/03 15:21, 52F
→
09/03 15:21, , 53F
09/03 15:21, 53F
→
09/03 15:21, , 54F
09/03 15:21, 54F
→
09/03 15:21, , 55F
09/03 15:21, 55F
推
09/03 15:21, , 56F
09/03 15:21, 56F
→
09/03 15:21, , 57F
09/03 15:21, 57F
噓
09/03 15:23, , 58F
09/03 15:23, 58F
推
09/03 15:23, , 59F
09/03 15:23, 59F
→
09/03 15:23, , 60F
09/03 15:23, 60F
推
09/03 15:26, , 61F
09/03 15:26, 61F
→
09/03 15:26, , 62F
09/03 15:26, 62F
噓
09/03 15:30, , 63F
09/03 15:30, 63F
推
09/03 15:32, , 64F
09/03 15:32, 64F
→
09/03 15:32, , 65F
09/03 15:32, 65F
→
09/03 15:33, , 66F
09/03 15:33, 66F
噓
09/03 15:33, , 67F
09/03 15:33, 67F
→
09/03 15:33, , 68F
09/03 15:33, 68F
→
09/03 15:33, , 69F
09/03 15:33, 69F
→
09/03 15:33, , 70F
09/03 15:33, 70F
推
09/03 15:34, , 71F
09/03 15:34, 71F
→
09/03 15:40, , 72F
09/03 15:40, 72F
→
09/03 15:43, , 73F
09/03 15:43, 73F
→
09/03 15:55, , 74F
09/03 15:55, 74F
噓
09/03 16:48, , 75F
09/03 16:48, 75F
噓
09/03 17:23, , 76F
09/03 17:23, 76F
噓
09/03 18:55, , 77F
09/03 18:55, 77F
噓
09/03 21:03, , 78F
09/03 21:03, 78F
→
09/03 21:03, , 79F
09/03 21:03, 79F
→
09/03 21:04, , 80F
09/03 21:04, 80F
噓
09/04 00:00, , 81F
09/04 00:00, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 10 篇):