[問卦] 為什麼要考默寫?消失
打給厚,我是一名高中國文老師。
開學第一天,我跟學生說:「我不喜歡考默寫,我覺得背書沒意義,所以以後小考不會考
這個。」結果昨天開教學研究會,所有同事一致決定(事實上是沿襲傳統),每次段考都
要考兩課默寫。我只好再告訴學生:「對不起還是要考,雖然不是我決定的。」學生們似
乎也習慣了,就默默接受。
雖然考默寫好像是國文課常態,但我實在不懂意義何在。對生活有幫助嗎?能促進思考、
陶冶性情、解決問題嗎?用最功利的角度看,大考也不考默寫啊!背誦式的題目已經慢慢
被淘汰了,那麼為什麼我們還是要兢兢業業地讓學生用最蠢的方式學習呢?
雖然這是我的專業領域,但我真的很困惑……是我比較奇怪嗎?其他老師好像都很贊同這
套傳統。
請問偉大的鄉民們有什麼比較好的答案嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.14.210.184
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504283381.A.96E.html
→
09/02 00:30, , 1F
09/02 00:30, 1F
→
09/02 00:30, , 2F
09/02 00:30, 2F
噓
09/02 00:30, , 3F
09/02 00:30, 3F
推
09/02 00:30, , 4F
09/02 00:30, 4F
推
09/02 00:30, , 5F
09/02 00:30, 5F
推
09/02 00:30, , 6F
09/02 00:30, 6F
→
09/02 00:30, , 7F
09/02 00:30, 7F
→
09/02 00:30, , 8F
09/02 00:30, 8F
推
09/02 00:30, , 9F
09/02 00:30, 9F
推
09/02 00:30, , 10F
09/02 00:30, 10F
→
09/02 00:31, , 11F
09/02 00:31, 11F
推
09/02 00:31, , 12F
09/02 00:31, 12F
推
09/02 00:31, , 13F
09/02 00:31, 13F
推
09/02 00:31, , 14F
09/02 00:31, 14F
推
09/02 00:32, , 15F
09/02 00:32, 15F
→
09/02 00:32, , 16F
09/02 00:32, 16F
推
09/02 00:33, , 17F
09/02 00:33, 17F
→
09/02 00:33, , 18F
09/02 00:33, 18F
推
09/02 00:34, , 19F
09/02 00:34, 19F
推
09/02 00:34, , 20F
09/02 00:34, 20F
推
09/02 00:35, , 21F
09/02 00:35, 21F
噓
09/02 00:35, , 22F
09/02 00:35, 22F
→
09/02 00:35, , 23F
09/02 00:35, 23F
噓
09/02 00:35, , 24F
09/02 00:35, 24F
推
09/02 00:35, , 25F
09/02 00:35, 25F
推
09/02 00:36, , 26F
09/02 00:36, 26F
→
09/02 00:36, , 27F
09/02 00:36, 27F
推
09/02 00:36, , 28F
09/02 00:36, 28F
→
09/02 00:36, , 29F
09/02 00:36, 29F
→
09/02 00:36, , 30F
09/02 00:36, 30F
推
09/02 00:36, , 31F
09/02 00:36, 31F
→
09/02 00:36, , 32F
09/02 00:36, 32F
→
09/02 00:36, , 33F
09/02 00:36, 33F
→
09/02 00:36, , 34F
09/02 00:36, 34F
推
09/02 00:36, , 35F
09/02 00:36, 35F
→
09/02 00:37, , 36F
09/02 00:37, 36F
推
09/02 00:37, , 37F
09/02 00:37, 37F
→
09/02 00:37, , 38F
09/02 00:37, 38F
→
09/02 00:37, , 39F
09/02 00:37, 39F
還有 299 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
09/02 12:07, , 339F
09/02 12:07, 339F
→
09/02 12:07, , 340F
09/02 12:07, 340F
→
09/02 12:08, , 341F
09/02 12:08, 341F
推
09/02 12:17, , 342F
09/02 12:17, 342F
→
09/02 12:23, , 343F
09/02 12:23, 343F
推
09/02 12:23, , 344F
09/02 12:23, 344F
→
09/02 12:24, , 345F
09/02 12:24, 345F
推
09/02 12:27, , 346F
09/02 12:27, 346F
→
09/02 12:28, , 347F
09/02 12:28, 347F
→
09/02 12:29, , 348F
09/02 12:29, 348F
推
09/02 12:37, , 349F
09/02 12:37, 349F
→
09/02 12:41, , 350F
09/02 12:41, 350F
推
09/02 12:51, , 351F
09/02 12:51, 351F
→
09/02 12:56, , 352F
09/02 12:56, 352F
推
09/02 13:01, , 353F
09/02 13:01, 353F
→
09/02 13:01, , 354F
09/02 13:01, 354F
推
09/02 13:01, , 355F
09/02 13:01, 355F
推
09/02 13:07, , 356F
09/02 13:07, 356F
推
09/02 13:07, , 357F
09/02 13:07, 357F
噓
09/02 13:09, , 358F
09/02 13:09, 358F
推
09/02 13:14, , 359F
09/02 13:14, 359F
推
09/02 13:32, , 360F
09/02 13:32, 360F
→
09/02 13:39, , 361F
09/02 13:39, 361F
推
09/02 13:43, , 362F
09/02 13:43, 362F
推
09/02 13:52, , 363F
09/02 13:52, 363F
推
09/02 13:55, , 364F
09/02 13:55, 364F
→
09/02 14:08, , 365F
09/02 14:08, 365F
推
09/02 15:38, , 366F
09/02 15:38, 366F
推
09/02 16:11, , 367F
09/02 16:11, 367F
推
09/02 20:30, , 368F
09/02 20:30, 368F
推
09/02 20:34, , 369F
09/02 20:34, 369F
推
09/02 21:25, , 370F
09/02 21:25, 370F
噓
09/03 00:28, , 371F
09/03 00:28, 371F
推
09/03 12:02, , 372F
09/03 12:02, 372F
噓
09/03 12:09, , 373F
09/03 12:09, 373F
推
09/03 14:58, , 374F
09/03 14:58, 374F
推
09/03 21:14, , 375F
09/03 21:14, 375F
→
09/03 21:15, , 376F
09/03 21:15, 376F
→
09/03 21:15, , 377F
09/03 21:15, 377F
→
09/03 21:15, , 378F
09/03 21:15, 378F
討論串 (同標題文章)