Re: [新聞] 女權人士: 敦克爾克缺乏女角淪父權論述消失

看板Gossiping作者searenata時間8年前 (2017/08/18 02:12)推噓8(8推 0噓 6→)

留言14則, 11人參與討論串16/17 (看更多)

※ 引述《fffffff4 (使用者在線上)》之銘言： : 來源： : The daily caller : 標題： : Feminist Says Dunkirk Is A Bad Movie Because It Screams‘Men-Only’ 我想提醒一下英文報導並沒有把「缺女角」這件事放到標題只強調該女權人士（簡稱該女）認為這部電影是拍給男人看的（Men-Only） : 女權人士: 敦克爾克缺乏女角淪父權論述所以這句話完全是超譯。放到標題就是標準的「標題殺人法」。我是覺得啦，要戰女權也不必這樣。該女原文連結 http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/news/a28515/dunkirk-movie-review/ 基本上就是一篇廢文。我英文沒多好對照google翻譯看完的，看完覺得根本浪費我時間。文章中並沒有提出什麼明確理由去說明，這部片為何讓她覺得 "men-only" ，倒是花了不少篇幅在諷刺這部電影很普通，唯一特別的地方是起用Harry Styles（當然是一個諷刺的說法）。可能她認為，指出「敦克爾克是一部不特別的戰爭電影」，就已經足以說明這部片是"men-only"。靠北，沒看電影也要看影評啊，這麼弱是要怎麼說服人。所以整篇文章幾乎都是酸言酸語，唯一具體的內容是靠北諾蘭說：你想拍個特別的、顛覆戰爭片典型的東西，幹嘛不拍二戰時期的女性。以女權人士來講，這種主張只不過是不意外的正常能量釋放，英文報導的標題雖然中規中矩，但坦白講挑這種話提出來吵根本就是騙點擊率的，這種廢文不要理他就好了啊。幹，我也不知道要講什麼惹。看完這些東西我覺得我在浪費生命，只好來板上發這篇幹話賺點P幣。 : 內文： : Christopher Nolan’s “Dunkirk” is being celebrated as one of the strongest m : ovies of the year—and may perhaps rank among one of the best war movies ever : made alongside “Saving Private Ryan,” “Hacksaw Ridge,” and “Black Hawk Do : wn.” Like the other great films, it doesn’t glorify war, but instead emphasi : zes the tragedy of war. But because male critics are praising it, women’s mag : azine Marie Claire has seen fit to trash the film for “celebrating maleness” : —asking instead why war movies aren’t being made for women. : 敦克爾克被譽為最偉大的戰爭電影，與搶救雷恩大兵等電影齊名。但女性雜誌Marie Clai : re卻批評本電影「高抬男性氣質」，並質疑戰爭片為什麼無法讓女性感動。 : Writing for Marie Claire, Mehera Bonner declared “Dunkirk” to be “basic.” : “And look, it’s not like I need every movie to have ‘strong female leads.’ : Wonder Woman can probably tide me over for at least a year and I understand t : hat this was dominated by brave male soldiers. I get that,” she wrote, before : slamming the film for its “general vibe.” : Despite enjoying the film’s intense moments and even the performances of its : actors, including One Direction’s Harry Styles in his first big screen appear : ance, the Marie Claire writer slams Dunkirk for being “designed for men to ma : n-out over.” : 雜誌專欄作家Mehera Bonner表示，敦克爾克很平庸的一部片。她說：「我不是要每部電 : 影都有女強人當主角，我很喜歡神力女超人，但我也了解戰爭是男人打的。」 : 但她也批評敦克爾克是為男人而拍的電影。 : “The tenor of the people applauding it just screams ‘men-only’,” she conti : nued, citing that the only reason male critics liked it was because it allowed : them to feel manly. : 她表示，只有男人才能欣賞此片，男人之所以喜歡，是因為看完會覺得有男子氣概。 : Bonner continues: “To me, Dunkirk felt like an excuse for men to celebrate ma : leness—which apparently they don’t get to do enough. Fine, great, go forth, : but if Nolan’s entire purpose is breaking the established war movie mold and : doing something different—why not make a movie about women in World War II?” : The Marie Claire writer argues that it’s the responsibility of top-tier dire : ctors like Nolan to make the films she wants more of. : 敦克爾克成了男人高抬男子氣概的藉口。 : 如果諾蘭導演想要打破戰爭片傳統，何不拍部二戰中的女性？ : This year’s “Wonder Woman” and “Atomic Blonde” are both highly rated film : s, revealing little gender bias among film critics. Likewise, the female-drive : n “Mad Max: Fury Road” was equally enjoyed by critics of either sex, earning : it a spot as one of the highest rated films ever made. Films about women in t : imes of war have been made, several to critical acclaim—including “Zero Dark : Thirty” and “The English Patient.” According to film reviewers, each of th : ese films broke the mold by taking typically male settings and centering them : around female protagonists. : Dunkirk was a prominent event in military history, but is rarely given notice : in pop culture. To anyone who’s heard of Dunkirk, the evacuation is largely r : emembered as both a miracle and a disaster for the Allied forces in Europe dur : ing World War II. Failing to defend France against the Germans, the British we : re forced to evacuate over 338,000 troops with the aid of private civilians. : However, over 30,000 troops were left behind to be captured as prisoners of wa : r to the German army. The British press managed to turn the loss into a sort o : f victory with the “Dunkirk Spirit” that showed the solidarity of the Britis : h people in saving the lives of their countrymen. With “Dunkirk,” Christophe : r Nolan shed light on an event that would’ve otherwise relegated to the histo : ry books. : https://tinyurl.com/ybutwwoh -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.241.153.169 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502993525.A.ECC.html

推

wuyiulin

08/18 02:13, , 1^F

08/18 02:13, 1^F

→

gankgf

08/18 02:13, , 2^F

08/18 02:13, 2^F

推

hogu134

08/18 02:13, , 3^F

08/18 02:13, 3^F