Re: [新聞] 葉宜津舉311大震挺限電 「都是馬政府的錯」消失
我問幾個問題啦
1. 誰封存核四的? 馬英九
2. 為什麼缺電? 因為沒有核四
3. 為什麼沒有核四? 因為核四被馬英九封存
所以為什麼會缺電的最大禍首
還是馬英九阿!!!
我說完了 ... 誰贊成 誰反對?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.247.72.69
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1501643595.A.EF2.html
※ 編輯: tml7415 (27.247.72.69), 08/02/2017 11:13:44
→
08/02 11:13, , 1F
08/02 11:13, 1F
推
08/02 11:13, , 2F
08/02 11:13, 2F
林義雄有執政嗎? ? ? 黑人問號? 你乾脆說台灣老百姓 自己負責 好不好
推
08/02 11:13, , 3F
08/02 11:13, 3F
→
08/02 11:14, , 4F
08/02 11:14, 4F
※ 編輯: tml7415 (27.247.72.69), 08/02/2017 11:14:59
推
08/02 11:14, , 5F
08/02 11:14, 5F
推
08/02 11:14, , 6F
08/02 11:14, 6F
→
08/02 11:15, , 7F
08/02 11:15, 7F
推
08/02 11:15, , 8F
08/02 11:15, 8F
推
08/02 11:15, , 9F
08/02 11:15, 9F
→
08/02 11:15, , 10F
08/02 11:15, 10F
→
08/02 11:15, , 11F
08/02 11:15, 11F
推
08/02 11:15, , 12F
08/02 11:15, 12F
→
08/02 11:15, , 13F
08/02 11:15, 13F
→
08/02 11:15, , 14F
08/02 11:15, 14F
→
08/02 11:15, , 15F
08/02 11:15, 15F
噓
08/02 11:16, , 16F
08/02 11:16, 16F
噓
08/02 11:16, , 17F
08/02 11:16, 17F
→
08/02 11:16, , 18F
08/02 11:16, 18F
→
08/02 11:16, , 19F
08/02 11:16, 19F
推
08/02 11:17, , 20F
08/02 11:17, 20F
→
08/02 11:17, , 21F
08/02 11:17, 21F
噓
08/02 11:17, , 22F
08/02 11:17, 22F
推
08/02 11:17, , 23F
08/02 11:17, 23F
→
08/02 11:17, , 24F
08/02 11:17, 24F
→
08/02 11:17, , 25F
08/02 11:17, 25F
推
08/02 11:17, , 26F
08/02 11:17, 26F
→
08/02 11:18, , 27F
08/02 11:18, 27F
少騙了啦 現在重啟核四 國民黨又要帶風向說 蔡英文轉彎 ...
※ 編輯: tml7415 (27.247.72.69), 08/02/2017 11:18:50
噓
08/02 11:18, , 28F
08/02 11:18, 28F
推
08/02 11:19, , 29F
08/02 11:19, 29F
噓
08/02 11:19, , 30F
08/02 11:19, 30F
噓
08/02 11:19, , 31F
08/02 11:19, 31F
→
08/02 11:19, , 32F
08/02 11:19, 32F
→
08/02 11:20, , 33F
08/02 11:20, 33F
→
08/02 11:21, , 34F
08/02 11:21, 34F
→
08/02 11:21, , 35F
08/02 11:21, 35F
→
08/02 11:21, , 36F
08/02 11:21, 36F
還有 30 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
08/02 11:38, , 67F
08/02 11:38, 67F
推
08/02 11:40, , 68F
08/02 11:40, 68F
推
08/02 11:40, , 69F
08/02 11:40, 69F
推
08/02 11:44, , 70F
08/02 11:44, 70F
噓
08/02 11:44, , 71F
08/02 11:44, 71F
噓
08/02 11:44, , 72F
08/02 11:44, 72F
推
08/02 11:45, , 73F
08/02 11:45, 73F
噓
08/02 11:45, , 74F
08/02 11:45, 74F
噓
08/02 11:48, , 75F
08/02 11:48, 75F
推
08/02 11:48, , 76F
08/02 11:48, 76F
→
08/02 11:48, , 77F
08/02 11:48, 77F
噓
08/02 11:50, , 78F
08/02 11:50, 78F
推
08/02 11:51, , 79F
08/02 11:51, 79F
推
08/02 11:53, , 80F
08/02 11:53, 80F
推
08/02 11:53, , 81F
08/02 11:53, 81F
→
08/02 11:54, , 82F
08/02 11:54, 82F
噓
08/02 11:55, , 83F
08/02 11:55, 83F
推
08/02 11:57, , 84F
08/02 11:57, 84F
推
08/02 11:59, , 85F
08/02 11:59, 85F
→
08/02 12:06, , 86F
08/02 12:06, 86F
推
08/02 12:15, , 87F
08/02 12:15, 87F
噓
08/02 12:21, , 88F
08/02 12:21, 88F
噓
08/02 12:23, , 89F
08/02 12:23, 89F
噓
08/02 12:24, , 90F
08/02 12:24, 90F
推
08/02 12:26, , 91F
08/02 12:26, 91F
推
08/02 12:27, , 92F
08/02 12:27, 92F
噓
08/02 12:28, , 93F
08/02 12:28, 93F
噓
08/02 12:31, , 94F
08/02 12:31, 94F
→
08/02 12:38, , 95F
08/02 12:38, 95F
噓
08/02 12:42, , 96F
08/02 12:42, 96F
推
08/02 13:00, , 97F
08/02 13:00, 97F
噓
08/02 13:34, , 98F
08/02 13:34, 98F
→
08/02 13:34, , 99F
08/02 13:34, 99F
→
08/02 14:11, , 100F
08/02 14:11, 100F
噓
08/02 14:39, , 101F
08/02 14:39, 101F
推
08/02 17:35, , 102F
08/02 17:35, 102F
推
08/02 18:10, , 103F
08/02 18:10, 103F
噓
08/02 18:22, , 104F
08/02 18:22, 104F
→
08/03 06:13, , 105F
08/03 06:13, 105F
推
08/03 15:44, , 106F
08/03 15:44, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 17 篇):