[問卦] 為何中國國民黨守不住長江天險?消失
歷史課本有教,解放戰爭的徐蚌會戰後,KMT的重兵團幾乎殲滅
守江必守淮戰略破功,解放軍實力大增,國軍則是士氣低迷
但無論如何,當時國軍尚有100多萬軍隊,雖然與解放軍實力差距拉大
但未必無法以少擊多,對比當年孫、劉聯手抗曹之赤壁之戰
或是東晉力抗前秦苻堅之肥水之戰,都是著名歷史典故
甚至當時前秦還嗆聲說:投鞭斷流,軍力對比將近10倍,結果給東晉巴假的
當時東晉、東吳所面對形勢比KMT更為險峻,但人家就守的住防線,
為何KMT守不住?甚至未打之前就風聲鶴唳,準備跑到臺灣來?
難道當時國軍真的沒有謝安、周瑜之流的軍事指揮家,
如果沒有,那1949年前黃埔軍校系統培養的什麼人才?
--
And I do not have to apologize for being a Taiwanese
我不需要因為身為台灣人而向任何人道歉
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.223.104.183
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1497796610.A.396.html
→
06/18 22:37, , 1F
06/18 22:37, 1F
→
06/18 22:37, , 2F
06/18 22:37, 2F
→
06/18 22:37, , 3F
06/18 22:37, 3F
→
06/18 22:37, , 4F
06/18 22:37, 4F
推
06/18 22:37, , 5F
06/18 22:37, 5F
→
06/18 22:37, , 6F
06/18 22:37, 6F
→
06/18 22:37, , 7F
06/18 22:37, 7F
推
06/18 22:37, , 8F
06/18 22:37, 8F
→
06/18 22:38, , 9F
06/18 22:38, 9F
推
06/18 22:38, , 10F
06/18 22:38, 10F
→
06/18 22:38, , 11F
06/18 22:38, 11F
→
06/18 22:38, , 12F
06/18 22:38, 12F
→
06/18 22:38, , 13F
06/18 22:38, 13F
推
06/18 22:38, , 14F
06/18 22:38, 14F
→
06/18 22:38, , 15F
06/18 22:38, 15F
推
06/18 22:38, , 16F
06/18 22:38, 16F
推
06/18 22:39, , 17F
06/18 22:39, 17F
→
06/18 22:39, , 18F
06/18 22:39, 18F
推
06/18 22:39, , 19F
06/18 22:39, 19F
→
06/18 22:39, , 20F
06/18 22:39, 20F
→
06/18 22:39, , 21F
06/18 22:39, 21F
推
06/18 22:39, , 22F
06/18 22:39, 22F
→
06/18 22:39, , 23F
06/18 22:39, 23F
推
06/18 22:39, , 24F
06/18 22:39, 24F
推
06/18 22:40, , 25F
06/18 22:40, 25F
推
06/18 22:40, , 26F
06/18 22:40, 26F
→
06/18 22:40, , 27F
06/18 22:40, 27F
噓
06/18 22:40, , 28F
06/18 22:40, 28F
→
06/18 22:40, , 29F
06/18 22:40, 29F
→
06/18 22:40, , 30F
06/18 22:40, 30F
→
06/18 22:40, , 31F
06/18 22:40, 31F
推
06/18 22:40, , 32F
06/18 22:40, 32F
→
06/18 22:40, , 33F
06/18 22:40, 33F
→
06/18 22:41, , 34F
06/18 22:41, 34F
推
06/18 22:41, , 35F
06/18 22:41, 35F
→
06/18 22:41, , 36F
06/18 22:41, 36F
→
06/18 22:42, , 37F
06/18 22:42, 37F
推
06/18 22:42, , 38F
06/18 22:42, 38F
→
06/18 22:42, , 39F
06/18 22:42, 39F
還有 54 則推文
→
06/18 23:28, , 94F
06/18 23:28, 94F
推
06/18 23:29, , 95F
06/18 23:29, 95F
→
06/18 23:32, , 96F
06/18 23:32, 96F
→
06/18 23:33, , 97F
06/18 23:33, 97F
→
06/18 23:34, , 98F
06/18 23:34, 98F
推
06/18 23:43, , 99F
06/18 23:43, 99F
推
06/18 23:46, , 100F
06/18 23:46, 100F
推
06/18 23:58, , 101F
06/18 23:58, 101F
推
06/19 00:06, , 102F
06/19 00:06, 102F
噓
06/19 00:09, , 103F
06/19 00:09, 103F
推
06/19 00:47, , 104F
06/19 00:47, 104F
→
06/19 00:53, , 105F
06/19 00:53, 105F
推
06/19 00:59, , 106F
06/19 00:59, 106F
推
06/19 01:06, , 107F
06/19 01:06, 107F
推
06/19 01:17, , 108F
06/19 01:17, 108F
推
06/19 01:18, , 109F
06/19 01:18, 109F
推
06/19 01:25, , 110F
06/19 01:25, 110F
噓
06/19 01:54, , 111F
06/19 01:54, 111F
→
06/19 01:54, , 112F
06/19 01:54, 112F
推
06/19 02:50, , 113F
06/19 02:50, 113F
推
06/19 03:05, , 114F
06/19 03:05, 114F
噓
06/19 03:17, , 115F
06/19 03:17, 115F
噓
06/19 03:55, , 116F
06/19 03:55, 116F
推
06/19 04:29, , 117F
06/19 04:29, 117F
推
06/19 07:26, , 118F
06/19 07:26, 118F
→
06/19 08:36, , 119F
06/19 08:36, 119F
→
06/19 09:02, , 120F
06/19 09:02, 120F
→
06/19 09:04, , 121F
06/19 09:04, 121F
推
06/19 09:24, , 122F
06/19 09:24, 122F
推
06/19 09:34, , 123F
06/19 09:34, 123F
推
06/19 11:04, , 124F
06/19 11:04, 124F
→
06/19 11:04, , 125F
06/19 11:04, 125F
推
06/19 12:45, , 126F
06/19 12:45, 126F
推
06/19 12:52, , 127F
06/19 12:52, 127F
推
06/19 13:00, , 128F
06/19 13:00, 128F
→
06/19 13:37, , 129F
06/19 13:37, 129F
噓
06/19 14:57, , 130F
06/19 14:57, 130F
噓
06/19 18:14, , 131F
06/19 18:14, 131F
→
06/19 18:15, , 132F
06/19 18:15, 132F
→
06/19 18:24, , 133F
06/19 18:24, 133F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):