[問卦] 老外說台灣不是國家 因宣稱擁有中國 要怎麼反駁?消失
影片下面看到一堆老外在討論,
提到台灣是不是國家,大部分老外認為是國家(爽),因
為有獨立的政府貨幣軍隊…等,只是承認台灣的國家比較少,但仍是個國家。
但就是有人跳出來說不是,
說台灣自己稱為ROC,說宣稱(claim)擁有中國以及蒙古。
其實現存憲法只提到”固有疆域”四個字,就句點。沒提到蒙古。
相關法律也只提到「臺灣地區以外之中華民國領土」就句點。沒提蒙古。
只是地圖會畫到吧。就是林昶佐也在批評的那些。
對於這樣的處境,要怎麼反駁比較快速啊?
有沒有英文整段簡明的 可讓人複製貼上
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 202.68.254.99
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1496046823.A.672.html
→
05/29 16:34, , 1F
05/29 16:34, 1F
→
05/29 16:34, , 2F
05/29 16:34, 2F
這種回應,上次有看到 就是這個:
The most absurd part is that if they ever dropped the claims the Mainland
would see it as a pro-independence provocation.
What a curious situation.
"You don't claim our lands? How dare you!"
Makes sense obviously but still a bit of an odd one.
→
05/29 16:34, , 3F
05/29 16:34, 3F
→
05/29 16:34, , 4F
05/29 16:34, 4F
→
05/29 16:34, , 5F
05/29 16:34, 5F
推
05/29 16:35, , 6F
05/29 16:35, 6F
→
05/29 16:35, , 7F
05/29 16:35, 7F
推
05/29 16:35, , 8F
05/29 16:35, 8F
→
05/29 16:36, , 9F
05/29 16:36, 9F
→
05/29 16:36, , 10F
05/29 16:36, 10F
→
05/29 16:36, , 11F
05/29 16:36, 11F
※ 編輯: Jeby171 (202.68.254.99), 05/29/2017 16:37:59
推
05/29 16:38, , 12F
05/29 16:38, 12F
→
05/29 16:39, , 13F
05/29 16:39, 13F
→
05/29 16:41, , 14F
05/29 16:41, 14F
→
05/29 16:41, , 15F
05/29 16:41, 15F
→
05/29 16:41, , 16F
05/29 16:41, 16F
推
05/29 16:43, , 17F
05/29 16:43, 17F
→
05/29 16:43, , 18F
05/29 16:43, 18F
→
05/29 16:43, , 19F
05/29 16:43, 19F
推
05/29 16:47, , 20F
05/29 16:47, 20F
推
05/29 16:47, , 21F
05/29 16:47, 21F
推
05/29 16:53, , 22F
05/29 16:53, 22F
推
05/29 16:57, , 23F
05/29 16:57, 23F
→
05/29 17:02, , 24F
05/29 17:02, 24F
→
05/29 17:03, , 25F
05/29 17:03, 25F
→
05/29 17:03, , 26F
05/29 17:03, 26F
→
05/29 17:03, , 27F
05/29 17:03, 27F
→
05/29 17:05, , 28F
05/29 17:05, 28F
→
05/29 17:06, , 29F
05/29 17:06, 29F
→
05/29 17:06, , 30F
05/29 17:06, 30F
推
05/29 17:07, , 31F
05/29 17:07, 31F
→
05/29 17:12, , 32F
05/29 17:12, 32F
→
05/29 17:13, , 33F
05/29 17:13, 33F
→
05/29 17:14, , 34F
05/29 17:14, 34F
→
05/29 17:15, , 35F
05/29 17:15, 35F
→
05/29 17:16, , 36F
05/29 17:16, 36F
→
05/29 17:17, , 37F
05/29 17:17, 37F
→
05/29 17:18, , 38F
05/29 17:18, 38F
推
05/29 17:25, , 39F
05/29 17:25, 39F
推
05/29 17:34, , 40F
05/29 17:34, 40F
推
05/29 17:46, , 41F
05/29 17:46, 41F
推
05/29 17:58, , 42F
05/29 17:58, 42F
→
05/29 18:08, , 43F
05/29 18:08, 43F
→
05/29 18:08, , 44F
05/29 18:08, 44F
推
05/29 18:23, , 45F
05/29 18:23, 45F
推
05/29 18:49, , 46F
05/29 18:49, 46F
→
05/29 18:49, , 47F
05/29 18:49, 47F
推
05/29 19:30, , 48F
05/29 19:30, 48F
→
05/29 19:31, , 49F
05/29 19:31, 49F
噓
05/29 21:16, , 50F
05/29 21:16, 50F
→
05/29 21:17, , 51F
05/29 21:17, 51F
推
05/29 23:07, , 52F
05/29 23:07, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):