Re: [問卦] 甲甲敢不敢取消愛滋補助呢!?消失
小弟高中讀三類大學二類
一直都很理性喇
我覺得今天甲甲是一個趨勢嘛
臺灣走向改革開放民智漸開 很好啊
但是今天大家有這個疑慮
是不是你們要出來說明清楚?
不是說什麼歧視為什麼你們要主動說明
這個是公眾議題
牽涉到大家一起繳的稅金
因為現在大家有疑慮的是
你們的性交是比較危險的
如果沒有,當然要出來澄清啊?
拿出數據來嘛!
這樣不只提供社會大眾一個正確的知識
而且臺灣的民風民智會更加進步
你們一直打迷糊仗跳針
反而給衛道人士很好的一個施力點
甲甲加油,我相信臺灣會更好。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.47.161.247
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1495994156.A.D0C.html
→
05/29 01:56, , 1F
05/29 01:56, 1F
→
05/29 01:57, , 2F
05/29 01:57, 2F
現在衛道拿甲甲的性交當吸毒的在打
你要給吸毒的人補助什麼?
吸毒的錢嗎?
我倒是很好奇你甲甲為什麼不敢拿出數據
※ 編輯: wuyiulin (114.47.161.247), 05/29/2017 01:58:57
推
05/29 01:57, , 3F
05/29 01:57, 3F
推
05/29 01:57, , 4F
05/29 01:57, 4F
→
05/29 01:57, , 5F
05/29 01:57, 5F
噓
05/29 01:57, , 6F
05/29 01:57, 6F
→
05/29 01:58, , 7F
05/29 01:58, 7F
→
05/29 01:59, , 8F
05/29 01:59, 8F
→
05/29 01:59, , 9F
05/29 01:59, 9F
推
05/29 01:59, , 10F
05/29 01:59, 10F
→
05/29 01:59, , 11F
05/29 01:59, 11F
→
05/29 01:59, , 12F
05/29 01:59, 12F
好主意 應該寫封信給疾管署
※ 編輯: wuyiulin (114.47.161.247), 05/29/2017 02:01:04
→
05/29 02:01, , 13F
05/29 02:01, 13F
推
05/29 02:01, , 14F
05/29 02:01, 14F
→
05/29 02:01, , 15F
05/29 02:01, 15F
推
05/29 02:01, , 16F
05/29 02:01, 16F
→
05/29 02:01, , 17F
05/29 02:01, 17F
說老實話,結婚跟愛滋應該是沒啥關係。
※ 編輯: wuyiulin (114.47.161.247), 05/29/2017 02:02:11
→
05/29 02:01, , 18F
05/29 02:01, 18F
→
05/29 02:01, , 19F
05/29 02:01, 19F
→
05/29 02:02, , 20F
05/29 02:02, 20F
→
05/29 02:02, , 21F
05/29 02:02, 21F
推
05/29 02:02, , 22F
05/29 02:02, 22F
推
05/29 02:03, , 23F
05/29 02:03, 23F
→
05/29 02:03, , 24F
05/29 02:03, 24F
推
05/29 02:03, , 25F
05/29 02:03, 25F
推
05/29 02:03, , 26F
05/29 02:03, 26F
→
05/29 02:03, , 27F
05/29 02:03, 27F
→
05/29 02:03, , 28F
05/29 02:03, 28F
→
05/29 02:04, , 29F
05/29 02:04, 29F
→
05/29 02:04, , 30F
05/29 02:04, 30F
→
05/29 02:04, , 31F
05/29 02:04, 31F
這個言論是滿偏激的啦
畢竟臺灣有過最棒的節育政策宣導
現在我們的出生率是全世界第一。 第一低
→
05/29 02:04, , 32F
05/29 02:04, 32F
推 我覺得最衰的就是母子垂直愛滋的小孩
※ 編輯: wuyiulin (114.47.161.247), 05/29/2017 02:06:49
→
05/29 02:05, , 33F
05/29 02:05, 33F
→
05/29 02:05, , 34F
05/29 02:05, 34F
還有 76 則推文
還有 5 段內文
→
05/29 02:33, , 111F
05/29 02:33, 111F
→
05/29 02:33, , 112F
05/29 02:33, 112F
推
05/29 02:34, , 113F
05/29 02:34, 113F
→
05/29 02:35, , 114F
05/29 02:35, 114F
→
05/29 02:35, , 115F
05/29 02:35, 115F
→
05/29 02:35, , 116F
05/29 02:35, 116F
→
05/29 02:36, , 117F
05/29 02:36, 117F
哦,這點我個人是非常支持的。
※ 編輯: wuyiulin (223.137.14.48), 05/29/2017 02:37:14
→
05/29 02:37, , 118F
05/29 02:37, 118F
→
05/29 02:37, , 119F
05/29 02:37, 119F
推
05/29 02:41, , 120F
05/29 02:41, 120F
→
05/29 02:42, , 121F
05/29 02:42, 121F
→
05/29 02:43, , 122F
05/29 02:43, 122F
→
05/29 02:43, , 123F
05/29 02:43, 123F
→
05/29 02:44, , 124F
05/29 02:44, 124F
→
05/29 02:44, , 125F
05/29 02:44, 125F
→
05/29 02:45, , 126F
05/29 02:45, 126F
→
05/29 02:45, , 127F
05/29 02:45, 127F
→
05/29 02:46, , 128F
05/29 02:46, 128F
推
05/29 02:48, , 129F
05/29 02:48, 129F
→
05/29 02:48, , 130F
05/29 02:48, 130F
噓
05/29 02:49, , 131F
05/29 02:49, 131F
→
05/29 02:49, , 132F
05/29 02:49, 132F
→
05/29 02:49, , 133F
05/29 02:49, 133F
→
05/29 02:50, , 134F
05/29 02:50, 134F
噓
05/29 02:55, , 135F
05/29 02:55, 135F
噓
05/29 03:01, , 136F
05/29 03:01, 136F
推
05/29 03:29, , 137F
05/29 03:29, 137F
→
05/29 03:59, , 138F
05/29 03:59, 138F
→
05/29 03:59, , 139F
05/29 03:59, 139F
噓
05/29 07:18, , 140F
05/29 07:18, 140F
→
05/29 07:34, , 141F
05/29 07:34, 141F
推
05/29 09:26, , 142F
05/29 09:26, 142F
推
05/29 09:34, , 143F
05/29 09:34, 143F
噓
05/29 10:05, , 144F
05/29 10:05, 144F
→
05/29 10:12, , 145F
05/29 10:12, 145F
推
05/29 12:59, , 146F
05/29 12:59, 146F
推
05/29 15:20, , 147F
05/29 15:20, 147F
推
05/29 16:07, , 148F
05/29 16:07, 148F
→
05/29 16:07, , 149F
05/29 16:07, 149F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 11 篇):